Government and Policy

    'Don't be too demanding' on GPA offer

    By Ding Qingfen (China Daily)
    Updated: 2010-08-06 06:53
    Large Medium Small

    BEIJING - The country is committed to joining the government procurement agreement (GPA) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) "as soon as possible", but still hopes GPA member nations including the US are not "too demanding" on its revised GPA offer, said Sun Zhenyu, China's ambassador to the global trade arbitrator.

    Related readings:
    'Don't be too demanding' on GPA offer Experts hail China's procurement offer
    'Don't be too demanding' on GPA offer New procurement regulations a win for domestic automakers
    'Don't be too demanding' on GPA offer More domestic marques in govt procurement
    'Don't be too demanding' on GPA offer Experts: Procurement policy not biased

    The GPA is a set of standards that grant foreign companies nondiscriminatory access to government purchases. Many expect China's procurement market, which was valued at 700 billion yuan ($100 billion) in 2009 and growing by more than 15 percent annually, to become open to foreign businesses if the country joins the GPA.

    The GPA is "quite a new term" for China and it will take "time and effort" for the country to improve its offer over the agreement, Sun said.

    If the country joins the agreement, it will also allow Chinese enterprises to enter the government procurement markets in 41 WTO member nations that have joined the GPA. The procurement amount of the US federal and local governments alone was estimated at $3 trillion in 2009, the People's Daily reported.

    China entered the WTO in 2001 without joining the GPA. In 2007, it submitted its bid to join the agreement but the US and other WTO members rejected its first proposal.

    'Don't be too demanding' on GPA offer

    In mid-July, China submitted a new offer to join the agreement. In the revised offer, the threshold for contracts was lowered and the coverage of both contracts and procurement entities were expanded. The implementation period was also reduced to five years from 15 years as had been indicated in the initial offer, Sun said.

    The first round of negotiations with GPA members was held in July and the next meeting is scheduled for October. There will be further in-depth discussion on the revised offer and on the process of China's accession, he added.

    US Deputy Trade Representative Demetrios Marantis has praised the revised version, saying that it contained "significant improvement" and was better than the earlier proposal in 2007.

    But many have still voiced concerns over the issue. One major concern is that the revised offer does not provide foreign companies access to local government and State-owned enterprise procurement contracts.

    A number of GPA member nations have asked China to add more entities into the new offer and further reduce the threshold during the latest negotiations.

    Sun said he did not agree with these requirements.

    "GPA parties should understand that, under the current offer, a lot of opportunities are provided. And the principle of reciprocity does not necessarily lie in the coverage and threshold, but more importantly, relates to the scale of China's economy and its growth rate," he said.

    "China is going through fast economic growth. Numerous contracts will be given out in supplies, services and construction. These will help the world economy to recover from the crisis," Sun said.

    Tong Zhiguang, a former vice-minister of commerce and a chief WTO negotiator, also said that the Chinese government has been taking a "positive attitude" in drafting the GPA proposal.

    It is unnecessary for China to "go too far" in making compromises on the issue because of the "external pressure", Tong said.

    In June, US Senator Debbie Stabenow said she would introduce legislation to prevent US enterprises from buying Chinese goods until China signs the GPA. Last week, the US House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing and criticized China's trade and industrial policy.

    But a number of US analysts said that US enterprises and government had "politicized" China's procurement law and indigenous innovation policy.

    In response to the US hearing, Elizabeth Lynch, founder of the China Law & Policy blogsite and an expert on China's legal reforms, wrote on her blog that the US Congress "missed the fact that China has actually promised to move forward".

    Brett Gerson, an associate with law firm Reed Smith on international relations, told China Daily that the Chinese marketplace presents "tremendous opportunities" even for foreign firms in sectors excluded from the procurement.

    Wu Chong in New York contributed to this story.

    亚洲日韩av无码| 国产精品无码一区二区在线| 国产精品成人无码久久久久久| 久久中文字幕一区二区| 丰满白嫩人妻中出无码| 亚洲va无码手机在线电影| 中文字幕一区一区三区| 人妻丰满?V无码久久不卡| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚| 最近免费中文字幕mv电影| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看牲色| 无码人妻久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 在线中文字幕一区| 永久免费无码日韩视频| 91精品国产综合久久四虎久久无码一级 | 最近免费字幕中文大全| 久久久久久久久久久久中文字幕 | 天天看高清无码一区二区三区| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码| 亚洲AV无码专区在线播放中文| 熟妇人妻系列av无码一区二区| 亚洲日韩中文无码久久| 色综合久久综合中文综合网| 一二三四社区在线中文视频| 日本妇人成熟免费中文字幕 | 亚洲午夜无码久久久久小说| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 精品人妻大屁股白浆无码 | 日韩免费a级毛片无码a∨| 国产精品无码DVD在线观看| 国产精品无码日韩欧| 精品无码久久久久国产| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安 | 国产∨亚洲V天堂无码久久久| 亚洲AV永久无码精品成人| 亚洲成AV人片在线观看无码| 无码无套少妇毛多18PXXXX| 色综合久久无码中文字幕| 国精无码欧精品亚洲一区| 本免费AV无码专区一区|