US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    China / Society

    Deposit insurance paves way for financial reform

    By Zhou Feng (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2014-12-02 17:38

    The People's Bank of China, the central bank of the country, has started to solicit public opinions on the establishment of the system, a prelude to formal installation of this long-awaited deposit safeguard mechanism.

    The central bank will cap insurance coverage at 500,000 ($81,000) for each depositor's saving at each bank. Such coverage will give full protection to 99.6 percent of the depositors in China.

    China is not the first economy to have such a system to protect depositors. The United States established such a system during the Great Depression, while more than 100 other economies such as Canada, Germany and Hong Kong all followed the practice.

    The system, which was born at the vortex of a financial crisis, aims to reduce information imbalance between banks and depositors, protect the latter and boost market confidence.

    But China's decision to introduce such a system has more purposes. It is supposed to inject more risk and competition into the market to pave way for more financial reforms.

    To understand this, it is needed to first review China's deposit protection practice.

    Although China doesn't have a deposit insurance system, the government actually bailed out almost all insolvent financial institutes in the past decades. From 1998 to 2003, more than 300 financial institutes went bankruptcy. Their debts of 170 billion yuan, owed to individual depositors and investors, was repaid by governments. The practice leaves an impression to retail depositors that all their savings are 100 percent safe with the government believed to provide the final guarantee.

    So, unlike developed economies, which go from no guarantee to limited guarantee or full guarantee, China actually goes from full guarantee to limited guarantee.

    The government guarantee in China, an unwritten rule, is a legacy of the era of planned economy, when nearly all banks and other financial institutes were invested and controlled by the government.

    Now that the government is working toward establishing the deposit insurance system, it means that the authority will let a market system to replace the government-insures-all model, a typical attempt to reduce government intervention with the market.

    By asking the market to insure its banks, the government is injecting a little risk into the banking system.

    The insurance system can be seen as a prelude for the establishment of private banks. As a prerequisite, private banks must be responsible for their decisions and operations. They shouldn't expect the government to bail them out in case of financial meltdown.

    With this rule erected, China is paving the way for the establishment of private banks.

    Similarly, the introduction of the deposit insurance system also conveys a message to state-controlled financial institutes: the government will not unlimitedly pay the bills for them.

    In addition, the system heralds the removal of deposit floor, the last step of China's interest rate liberalization. China has long placed a floor deposit rate. Although the rate is allowed to be lifted by a certain range in recent reform measures, the floor has not been scrapped, which means banks are not allowed to decide deposit rates by themselves.

    The controlled interest rate system has been a problem haunting China's financial system. It hinders the formation of market-orientated rates, creates an artificial interest rate gap for banks, reduces effects of monetary policies and weakens competition among financial institutes.

    China has scrapped lending rates, but retains the deposit floor, mostly because of fears that banks will vie to increase deposit rates to attract depositors. In China, big state banks are not keen to increase deposit banks thanks to their large client base, but smaller city commercial banks and other financial institutes are eager to attract more deposits to boost their capital pools. A pursuit of deposits may come with large risk appetite, thus putting depositors' money and interest at risk. That explains why the government is reluctant to remove the deposit floor. It is afraid it will be dragged into unlimited responsibility of insuring all depositors.

    Now that a clear deposit insurance system is to be set up, depositors' interest will be protect by the market rule instead of the previous unwritten government rule. With that guarantee in place, the time for scrapping the deposit floor is coming closer.

    The author is a financial analyst in Shanghai.

    Highlights
    Hot Topics

    ...
    无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文福利| 中文字幕av在线| 黑人无码精品又粗又大又长| 国产成人无码一二三区视频| 超清无码无卡中文字幕| 丰满少妇人妻无码| 一区二区三区无码视频免费福利| 欧美中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品无码日韩国产不卡?V| 日韩精品真人荷官无码| 精品无码国产自产在线观看水浒传| 精品久久久久久中文字幕大豆网| 久久99精品久久久久久hb无码| 一本一道AV无码中文字幕| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区 | 无码人妻丰满熟妇精品区| 制服中文字幕一区二区| 人妻中文字幕无码专区| 亚洲AV永久无码精品一区二区国产| 无码少妇精品一区二区免费动态| 狠狠躁天天躁中文字幕无码| 97人妻无码一区二区精品免费| 制服在线无码专区| √天堂中文www官网在线| 无码AV中文一区二区三区| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久| 亚洲国产综合精品中文第一| 久久人妻无码中文字幕| 婷婷五月六月激情综合色中文字幕 | 婷婷综合久久中文字幕| 久久精品天天中文字幕人妻| 亚洲色成人中文字幕网站| 欧美日韩国产中文高清视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 日本妇人成熟免费中文字幕 | 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影| 免费无码专区毛片高潮喷水 | 一本一道精品欧美中文字幕| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕豆芽|