US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    China / Government

    Reforms spark legal brain drain

    By Cao Yin (China Daily) Updated: 2015-10-12 06:41

    Reforms spark legal brain drain

    The Supreme People's Court's No 1 circuit court hears the first case in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, on March 2 after it started operations in February. MAO SIQIAN/XINHUA

    The changing face of China's legal system

    An overview of some of the reforms undertaken since pilot programs were introduced last year:

    In November, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court was established. One month later, IP courts were also established in Shanghai and Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong province.

    In late January, two circuit courts were opened under the Supreme People's Court-one in Shenyang, Liaoning province, the other in Shenzhen, Guangdong. Residents of the regions and areas under the courts' jurisdiction can lodge appeals with them instead of traveling to Beijing, where the country's top court is located. The new courts will also help to spread the workload for top judges.

    In March, a pilot program signaled the start of a program to reduce the number of judges serving at Shanghai's courts. The program aims to streamline the judicial process and improve the quality of decisions handed down. The number of judges will be lowered and some current judges may be reassigned to work as assistants, helping judges with legal research and administration, but will not be allowed to decide verdicts.

    Since May, all courts have been obliged to file and process cases without delay. Moreover, under the new case-registration system all appeals that fulfill legal and evidenciary requirements must be accepted immediately, without prior review.

    First person: Life was too tough, so I quit Cao Yin

    He Wei, 33, a former court official who faced an uphill battle to become a judge, resigned in June.

    In 2011, along with seven other law graduates, I was excited to start work at the court. I had to pass a civil service exam and then a judicial exam. They are two of the toughest tests in the country and many people fail them several times.

    Newcomers are required to undertake a one-year qualification period and then a further year of training.

    Before the judicial reforms, potential judges were required to work as engrossment clerks, who are responsible for recording the details of trials, for more than three years before they were deemed qualified to hear cases. Even then, they still had to be named as a judge by the president of the court.

    Under the reforms, that decision will be taken by the local legislature, but it seems that it will be harder to become a judge and will take longer to reach that level.

    Now, the position of legal assistant has been created. The assistants will help judges research materials, prepare trials and draft judgments, but they will not have the right to decide verdicts.

    I often worked overtime. I spent a lot of time studying complicated cases and even gave advice in court, but I was not a judge and I had no real status.

    Even more annoying, seniority was a key factor in the appointment of judges at grassroots courts. Before the reforms, judges could be promoted to chief judge or president as a result of seniority, and that's still the case.

    I can understand why the reforms state that the best qualified or most experienced people will be the first to be appointed as judges, but I cannot accept that some people-officials, for example-will get the same employment status because of their long service in the court.

    I had no idea how long it would take before I became a judge, even though I was qualified to be one. I had to spend time maintaining links and good relations with the court's leaders and those who were allowed to appoint judges. I was exhausted and my career was foundering.

    Before I began at the court, I believed I would simply pronounce verdicts in line with the law, but the reality shook me and led me to an employment crossroad.

    I'm sure that the reforms are aimed at solving the problems in China's judicial system, especially by ensuring that the best judges hear cases and by preventing local authorities or government departments from interfering in the process or verdict, but I couldn't wait to see how they would pan out.

    The economic pressure and other factors didn't allow me to wait. I was paid about 3,000 yuan ($472) a month, and that's not enough to get married on.

    Life was too tough. That's why I left my dream job.

    He Wei spoke with Cao Yin.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Highlights
    Hot Topics
    ...
    (愛妃視頻)国产无码中文字幕| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码电影| 一区 二区 三区 中文字幕| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区网站| 最新中文字幕av无码专区| 国产中文字幕在线观看| 久久久人妻精品无码一区| 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码不卡| 久热中文字幕无码视频| 国产在线观看无码免费视频 | 欧美乱人伦中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品无码成人片久久| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路百度| 亚洲精品99久久久久中文字幕| 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 无码午夜成人1000部免费视频| 国产品无码一区二区三区在线蜜桃 | 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇 | 亚洲av无码专区在线观看下载 | 欧美日本道中文高清| 国产无码一区二区在线| 熟妇人妻AV无码一区二区三区 | 久久无码人妻一区二区三区午夜| 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区| 在线看片福利无码网址| 亚洲精品人成无码中文毛片| 91中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕精品无码久久久久久3D日动漫 | 最近中文字幕大全免费视频 | 天堂中文字幕在线| 最近免费中文字幕大全免费| 日韩欧群交P片内射中文| 最好看的2018中文在线观看 | 在线观看免费无码视频| 亚洲国产综合无码一区二区二三区| 五月婷婷无码观看| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 中文亚洲AV片不卡在线观看| 亚洲AV区无码字幕中文色| 久久综合中文字幕|