Advanced Search  
      Opinion>Raymond Zhou
             
     

    Let sages enrich us, not polarize us
    Raymond Zhou China Daily  Updated: 2005-12-10 06:45

    Let sages enrich us, not polarize us

    "Guoxue" is sometimes translated as "Sinology," but it actually covers a much narrower area, mainly the study of classics by such masters as Confucius, Mencius, Lao Tzu, and Chuang Tzu.

    It seems hardly debatable that an educated Chinese should know something about these centuries-old sages, whose wisdom encapsulates so much of our culture and tradition. Yet, when Renmin University of China set up a school specially for "guoxue," it ignited a controversy.

    Who in his right mind would oppose the teaching of the quintessence of Chinese civilization, you might ask? It would be as unreasonable as preventing American students from getting a dose of Thoreau or Emerson, or Germans from brushing up on their Kant or Hegel.

    The fact is, for the past century "guoxue" was perhaps more popular in the West than in its native land. Ever since the May 4th Movement of 1911 discredited it wholesale, "guoxue" was seen more as baggage than a legacy for inspiration. These old books were largely responsible for keeping away Western concepts such as science and democracy and helped shackle China in a prolonged state of stagnation, critics have argued.

    I would say the radical step was necessary then, but things are different now. Time has given us a more balanced perspective. Take "The Analects of Confucius," which, together with "The Three-Character Classic," is probably the best-known of the "guoxue" works. (Some even mistake "guoxue" for Confucianism per se.)

    It is a mine of sagacity. "What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others." So goes one of the 499 aphorisms, which is remarkably similar to a sentence in the Bible.

    But some of the statements are grossly outdated and somewhat abominable. It is an understatement to say that Confucius was extremely sexist. Case in point: "Women and people of low birth are very hard to deal with." Actually, "people of low birth" is a "nicer" interpretation for "xiaoren" here; it can refer to people who are mean or despicable. And to lump women with the low life in one broad sweep is, in the least, extremely chauvinistic.

    I can't wait till a feminist scholar jumps on this Greatest Sage.

    Any school of thought in the calibre of Confucius offers an abundance of great wisdom, but it should not be seen as absolute truth to the exclusion of other ideas. When every word of any thinker - yes, even Confucius - is swallowed undigested, it would cause constipation of the mind. Needless to say, quotes like this should not be taught to children, but left in the hands of researchers. The problem as I see it does not lie with Confucius, but with the way his thoughts are imparted.

    In the 1,000-plus years when the national examination tested only knowledge of the "guoxue" classics, an education and a career usually involved putting oneself through the grind of memorization regardless of one's interpretation.

    Unfortunately, many of the newly adopted "guoxue" courses in China's elementary schools are a throwback to the old times, with emphasis on cramming indigestible texts, though not the whole canon, down the throats of youngsters. The ability to recite, rather than to comprehend and absorb, is often placed as a top priority.

    Apart from methodology, the motive of some who advocate "guoxue" is questionable.

    They tend to view it as a weapon in an imaginary cultural war vis-a-vis Western influences. "Why learn English when we have such a rich heritage in our backyard?" some would say. To them, it is more a symbol of pride than a source of knowledge. As such, a rational attitude may fall victim to blind devotion.

    In my opinion, "guoxue" should indeed be taught to young children, but not indiscriminately. Those in primary and secondary schools should receive only those parts they can understand and appreciate - the parts that are relevant today. College students should take courses that cover complete texts, but employ their own critical judgment. It is time we stopped yo-yoing from one extreme to another and treat "guoxue" with a discerning eye of respect instead of with the raised fists of religious fervour or contempt.

    "Guoxue" deals with the paragons of Chinese culture. Let it enrich and exalt us, not haunt or divide us.

    E-mail: raymondzhou@chinadaily.com.cn

    (China Daily 12/10/2005 page4)

     
      Story Tools  
       
    Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
    Advertisement
             

    | Home | News | Business | Living in China | Forum | E-Papers |Weather |

    |About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Jobs |
    Copyright 2005 Chinadaily.com.cn All rights reserved. Registered Number: 20100000002731
    无码精品日韩中文字幕| 国产精品无码永久免费888| 岛国av无码免费无禁网| 天堂网www中文在线资源| 国产午夜无码专区喷水| 无码一区二区三区视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类中文字幕组| 中文无码vs无码人妻| 97人妻无码一区二区精品免费| 国产成人无码一二三区视频| 日韩亚洲欧美中文高清| 久久无码人妻精品一区二区三区 | 日产无码1区2区在线观看| 亚洲av激情无码专区在线播放| 天堂8а√中文在线官网| 无码国内精品久久人妻麻豆按摩| 无码H肉动漫在线观看| 中文字幕久久精品无码| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 狠狠干中文字幕| 午夜无码一区二区三区在线观看| 国产成人无码av片在线观看不卡| 亚洲AV无码1区2区久久| 最近中文字幕2019视频1| 波多野结衣中文字幕在线| 中文字幕丰满乱子伦无码专区| 色欲香天天综合网无码| 97无码免费人妻超| 蜜桃视频无码区在线观看| 久久久久久av无码免费看大片| 国产精品午夜无码AV天美传媒| 69久久精品无码一区二区| 国产精品VA在线观看无码不卡| 无码精品A∨在线观看| 亚洲AV无码久久精品蜜桃| 无码人妻精品一区二区| 日韩免费无码一区二区三区| 久久久久久国产精品免费无码 | 亚洲AV无码一区东京热久久| 久久久久精品国产亚洲AV无码| 亚洲日韩av无码|