Home>News Center>China
           
     

    Exaggerated rally figures aim to fool HK public
    (China Daily HK Edition)
    Updated: 2004-07-08 09:15

    Hong Kong people are annoyed at the brazen way that the July 1 march organizers exaggerated the number of protesters and the motives behind their action, Hong Kong Commercial Daily said in an editorial published Wednesday. Excerpts follow:

    Some days have passed since this year's July 1 mass rally, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) government has started to respond in full swing to the myriad demands expressed by the participants.

    Nevertheless, society's scepticism over the attendance figure claimed by the Civil Human Rights Front (CHRF) has persisted.

    On the afternoon of July 1, CHRF, as organizer of the rally, amended several times its estimation of the total number of participants, within a short span of two hours, and finally announced excitedly the huge figure of 530,000. This number subsequently became the standard version, widely spread by many local and international media as "fact". But is it really the fact?

    Fortunately, there are still academics in Hong Kong who are not willing to believe blindly in others. They want to respect science and rationality, and persevere in the pursuit for truth. These scholars, through on-the-spot observations and serious research, were able to blow the lie sky high and recover the truth.

    Among them, researchers of the University of Hong Kong formed a special statistical group to carry out a "precise" calculation; and they concluded that the protest march figure should lie somewhere between 140,000 and 190,000. Some academics used satellite photographs for analysis and came up with the higher number of 260,000.

    For their internal use in assisting in the maintenance of public order and other works, the police did their own estimation and placed the figure at less than 200,000.

    In fact, there was no significant difference between the results of the various researches and estimations. Only the CHRF dared to ignore the facts and pronounce to the world that the total number of participants at the rally was 530,000. Were they not trying to cheat the world?

    We acknowledge that all statistical figures have a certain range of error, but there can never be such a magnitude as in CHRF's estimation. Its exaggeration exercise was undoubtedly an attempt to fool public opinion, the international community as well as Hong Kong people.

    CHRF has applied this trick time and again and has never been tired of it. This time it just went too far. One may wonder why the organization was not afraid of offending the public or having its lies exposed, and what its motives and purposes were in risking the tainting of its credibility and integrity.

    Judging from the subsequent moves of the "pro-democracy" camp, it is not difficult to find the answer. Once the rally was over, the "democrats" put forward the demand of revoking the decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on the 2007 and 2008 elections. It looks like they were using "public opinion" in Hong Kong to exert pressure on the central government.

    As a matter of fact, any observer of the July 1 rally would agree that the participants' demands were wide-ranging and manifold. Only part of the attendees advocated a radical pace of progress for realizing universal suffrage.

    Denying the facts, the "democrats" have blown up the attendance on the one hand and simplified public opinion into a request for universal suffrage in 2007 and 2008 on the other.

    What they were after was clear as daylight - increasing their political chips and influence and, certainly, gaining advantage in the Legislative Council election in September. When we see the true nature of the rally behind the boisterous slogan chanting, it is not hard to understand the "democrats'" hidden motive in exaggerating the figure.

    In fact, the government should listen sincerely to participants' demands and grievances and take follow-up actions no matter how large the crowd. It should do so even if only a few thousand showed up.

    Anybody who is frank and aboveboard and committed to doing what is good for Hong Kong does not need to resort to deception over the attendance figure. Since the CHRF has admitted its mistake in head-counting, why does it not step forward to correct its error in front of the world? If it insists on continuing with the fraud, its effort will backfire and it will lose all credibility.



     
      Today's Top News     Top China News
     

    Bird flu case rated 'isolated' occurrence

     

       
     

    HK's health chief quits over SARS

     

       
     

    Japan's sea exploration sparks tension

     

       
     

    Power shortage: 6,400 factories to go off-line

     

       
     

    Flooding kills 288 in 22 areas across China

     

       
     

    Bribery involved in Xi'an lottery fraud

     

       
      Bird flu case rated 'isolated' occurrence
       
      Bribery involved in Xi'an lottery fraud
       
      Ocean-going odyssey remains a treasure
       
      `Care For Girls' gaining momentum
       
      Online games to clean up their action
       
      Sewage fees not job of gov't?
       
     
      Go to Another Section  
     
     
      Story Tools  
       
      News Talk  
      When will china have direct elections?  
    Advertisement
             
    中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区应用| а天堂中文在线官网| 亚洲ⅴ国产v天堂a无码二区| 精品久久人妻av中文字幕| 精品无码日韩一区二区三区不卡| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久一本| 免费一区二区无码视频在线播放| 制服在线无码专区| 亚洲乳大丰满中文字幕| A级毛片无码久久精品免费| 亚洲一区二区三区无码中文字幕| 暖暖免费在线中文日本| 亚洲AV永久无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲人成国产精品无码| AV无码久久久久不卡网站下载| 亚洲日韩乱码中文无码蜜桃臀网站| 波多野结衣中文字幕久久| 夜夜精品无码一区二区三区| 国产精品无码免费播放| 成人无码区免费A∨直播| 日韩人妻精品无码一区二区三区 | 精品999久久久久久中文字幕| 成人无码区在线观看| 久久亚洲精品无码AV红樱桃| 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱孑伦AS | 无码中文字幕日韩专区视频| 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码 | 直接看的成人无码视频网站| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区亚洲视频1 | 波多野结衣中文在线播放| 无码中文av有码中文a| 人妻中文无码久热丝袜| 色噜噜亚洲精品中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 久クク成人精品中文字幕| 少妇人妻88久久中文字幕| 最近中文字幕完整版免费高清 | 中文字幕日韩一区二区三区不卡| 欧美中文字幕在线| 久久伊人中文无码|