久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

  Home>News Center>World
         
 

Study: 100,00 excess civilian Iraqi deaths since war
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-10-29 08:10

A survey of deaths in Iraqi households estimates that as many as 100,000 more people may have died throughout the country in the 18 months since the U.S.-led invasion than would be expected based on the death rate before the war.


A man cries for his slain son while next to a charred civilian vehicle which was blown up when insurgents set off a car bomb targeting a U.S. convoy in Baghdad, Iraq Thursday, Oct. 28, 2004. The man, whose son was killed six months ago, mourns regularly at the site of new bombings. [AP]
There is no official figure for the number of Iraqis killed since the conflict began, but some non-governmental estimates range from 10,000 to 30,000. As of Wednesday, 1,081 U.S. servicemen had been killed, according to the U.S. Defense Department.

The scientists who wrote the report concede that the data they based their projections on were of "limited precision," because the quality of the information depends on the accuracy of the household interviews used for the study. The interviewers were Iraqi, most of them doctors.

Designed and conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, Columbia University and the Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, the study is being published Thursday on the Web site of The Lancet medical journal.

The survey indicated violence accounted for most of the extra deaths seen since the invasion, and airstrikes from coalition forces caused most of the violent deaths, the researchers wrote in the British-based journal.

"Most individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and children," they said.

The report was released just days before the U.S. presidential election, and the lead researcher said he wanted it that way. The Lancet routinely publishes papers on the Web before they appear in print, particularly if it considers the findings of urgent public health interest.

Those reports then appear later in the print issue of the journal. The journal's spokesmen said they were uncertain which print issue the Iraqi report would appear in and said it was too late to make Friday's issue, and possibly too late for the Nov. 5 edition.

Les Roberts, the lead researcher from Johns Hopkins, said the article's timing was up to him.

"I emailed it in on Sept. 30 under the condition that it came out before the election," Roberts told The Asocciated Press. "My motive in doing that was not to skew the election. My motive was that if this came out during the campaign, both candidates would be forced to pledge to protect civilian lives in Iraq.

"I was opposed to the war and I still think that the war was a bad idea, but I think that our science has transcended our perspectives," Roberts said. "As an American, I am really, really sorry to be reporting this."

Richard Peto, an expert on study methods who was not involved with the research, said the approach the scientists took is a reasonable one to investigate the Iraq death toll.

However, it's possible that they may have zoned in on hotspots that might not be representative of the death toll across Iraq, said Peto, a professor of medical statistics at Oxford University in England.

Lancet editor Richard Horton wrote in an editorial accompanying the survey that more household clusters would have improved the precision of the report, "but at an enormous and unacceptable risk to the team of interviewers."

"This remarkable piece of work represents the efforts of a courageous team of scientists," he wrote.

To conduct the survey, investigators visited 33 neighborhoods spread evenly across the country in September, randomly selecting clusters of 30 households to sample. Of the 988 households visited, 808, consisting of 7,868 people, agreed to participate. Each group At each one they asked how many people lived in the home and how many births and deaths there had been since January 2002.

The scientists then compared death rates in the 15 months before the invasion with those that occurred during the 18 months after the attack and adjusted those numbers to account for the different time periods.

Even though the sample size appears small, this type of survey is considered accurate and acceptable by scientists and was used to calculate war deaths in Kosovo in the late 1990s.

The investigators worked in teams of three. Five of the six Iraqi interviewers were doctors and all six were fluent in English and Arabic.

In the households reporting deaths, the person who died had to be living there at the time of the death and for more than two months before to be counted. In an attempt at firmer confirmation, the interviewers asked for death certificates in 78 households and were provided them 63 times.

There were 46 deaths in the surveyed households before the war. After the invasion, there were 142 deaths. That is an increase from 5 deaths per 1,000 people per year to 12.3 per 1,000 people per year — more than double.

However, more than a third of the post-invasion deaths were reported in one cluster of households in the city Fallujah,

where fighting has been most intense recently. Because the fighting was so severe there, the numbers from that location may have exaggerated the overall picture.

When the researchers recalculated the effect of the war without the statistics from Fallujah, the deaths end up at 7.9 per 1,000 people per year — still 1.5 times higher than before the war.

Even with Fallujah factored out, the survey "indicates that the death toll associated with the invasion and occupation of Iraq is more likely than not about 100,000 people, and may be much higher," the report said.

The most common causes of death before the invasion of Iraq were heart attacks, strokes and other chronic diseases. However, after the invasion, violence was recorded as the primary cause of death and was mainly attributed to coalition forces — with about 95 percent of those deaths caused by bombs or fire from helicopter gunships.

Violent deaths — defined as those brought about by the intentional act of others — were reported in 15 of the 33 clusters. The chances of a violent death were 58 times higher after the invasion than before it, the researchers said.

Twelve of the 73 violent deaths were not attributed to coalition forces. The researchers said 28 children were killed by coalition forces in the survey households. Infant mortality rose from 29 deaths per 1,000 live births before the war to 57 deaths per 1,000 afterward.

The researchers estimated the nationwide death toll due to the conflict by subtracting the preinvasion death rate from the post-invasion death rate and multiplying that number by the estimated population of Iraq — 24.4 million at the start of the war. Then that number was converted to a total number of deaths by dividing by 1,000 and adjusting for the 18 months since the invasion.

"We estimate that there were 98,000 extra deaths during the postwar period in the 97 percent of Iraq represented by all the clusters except Fallujah," the researchers said in the journal.

"This isn't about individual soldiers doing bad things. This appears to be a problem with the approach to occupation in Iraq," Roberts said.

The researchers called for further confirmation by an independent body such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, or the World Health Organization.

The study was funded by the Center for International Emergency Disaster and Refugee Studies at Johns Hopkins University and by the Small Arms Survey in Geneva, Switzerland, a research project based at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva.



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

Two Chinese men to circle space for five days

 

   
 

Bush, Kerry in tight sprint to finish

 

   
 

New limits set on car fuel consumption

 

   
 

US trouser quota against WTO principles

 

   
 

Poisonous gas gush kills 15 Chinese miners

 

   
 

US deploys satellite jamming system

 

   
  Hostages in Afghanistan plead for release
   
  Bush, Kerry in tight sprint to finish
   
  Fresh American troops arriving in Iraq
   
  Rocket hits hotel in north Iraq, kills 15
   
  Iran parliament OKs nuke enrichment bill
   
  WHO calls summit to address flu pandemic
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement
         
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    肉大捧一出免费观看网站在线播放| 国产九九九视频| 中文字幕22页| 日韩精品在线中文字幕| 15—17女人毛片| 给我免费播放片在线观看| 日韩欧美国产片| 国产成人无码精品久久久性色| 欧美国产日韩在线视频| 日日碰狠狠躁久久躁婷婷| 精品免费久久久久久久| 91热这里只有精品| 国产原创popny丨九色| 国产对白在线播放| 欧美 日韩 国产 激情| 久艹在线免费观看| 一级黄色免费在线观看| av视屏在线播放| 妺妺窝人体色www看人体| 五月天婷婷在线观看视频| 免费在线观看的毛片| 日韩精品综合在线| 女同性恋一区二区| 天天色天天干天天色| wwwwxxxx日韩| 欧美日韩亚洲第一| 亚洲中文字幕无码av永久| 超碰97免费观看| 成人黄色一级大片| 日本老熟妇毛茸茸| av免费中文字幕| 国产白丝袜美女久久久久| www.日本在线视频| 成人在线免费高清视频| 最新视频 - x88av| ijzzijzzij亚洲大全| 天天干天天曰天天操| 五月婷婷之婷婷| 午夜激情av在线| 国产精品久久a| 天天爽人人爽夜夜爽| 成人三级视频在线播放| 激情伊人五月天| 人妻久久久一区二区三区| 免费看毛片的网址| 日韩视频在线视频| 青草青青在线视频| 成人一区二区免费视频| 欧美视频在线观看视频| 青草视频在线观看视频| 精品无码国模私拍视频| 青青艹视频在线| 国产在线青青草| 欧美视频第三页| 日本久久精品一区二区| www.日本一区| 九九久久久久久| 色哺乳xxxxhd奶水米仓惠香| 欧美日韩激情四射| 九色自拍视频在线观看| 37pao成人国产永久免费视频| 国产免费视频传媒| www午夜视频| 亚洲免费av网| 精品丰满人妻无套内射| 女人天堂av手机在线| 国产a级片免费观看| xxww在线观看| 免费成人进口网站| 亚洲熟妇无码一区二区三区导航| 99爱视频在线| av污在线观看| 99热一区二区三区| 水蜜桃色314在线观看| 国产一级片黄色| 亚洲一级片av| 国产精品国三级国产av| 美女福利视频在线| 亚洲无在线观看| 日韩黄色片在线| 北条麻妃在线视频| 亚洲AV无码成人精品一区| 超碰成人免费在线| 天天色综合天天色| 大陆极品少妇内射aaaaaa| 欧美三级一级片| 一道本在线免费视频| 欧美日韩视频免费| www.xxx亚洲| 穿情趣内衣被c到高潮视频| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区| 午夜久久福利视频| 国产va亚洲va在线va| 中文字幕有码av| 日韩成人手机在线| 亚欧美在线观看| 国产精彩视频一区二区| wwwwwxxxx日本| 亚洲熟妇无码一区二区三区| 亚洲另类第一页| 极品美女扒开粉嫩小泬| 涩多多在线观看| 久久婷婷五月综合色国产香蕉| 三级av免费看| 欧美xxxxx在线视频| 日韩一二区视频| 五月婷婷丁香色| 国产欧美日韩小视频| 亚洲第一天堂久久| 免费在线激情视频| 女女同性女同一区二区三区按摩| 成年人小视频网站| 成人国产一区二区三区| 一道本在线免费视频| 国产h视频在线播放| 亚洲小视频在线播放| 日本一二区免费| 777米奇影视第四色| 欧美亚洲黄色片| 日日夜夜精品视频免费观看| 欧美伦理片在线看| 日韩av高清在线看片| 国产精品88久久久久久妇女| 奇米视频7777| 三级a在线观看| 日日鲁鲁鲁夜夜爽爽狠狠视频97 | 久久综合久久网| 亚洲一二区在线观看| 国内自拍视频一区| 欧洲黄色一级视频| bt天堂新版中文在线地址| 黄频视频在线观看| 91福利免费观看| 污污的网站18| 噼里啪啦国语在线观看免费版高清版| 国产精品12345| 日韩精品在线观看av| 国产精品一二三在线观看| 中文字幕第22页| 亚洲美女性囗交| 九九热精品在线播放| 深夜黄色小视频| 欧美一级裸体视频| 激情五月亚洲色图| 老熟妇仑乱视频一区二区| 成人综合视频在线| 亚洲熟妇av一区二区三区漫画| 亚洲色欲久久久综合网东京热| 国产一区一区三区| 中文字幕免费高| 国产女人18毛片| 成人手机在线播放| av久久久久久| 大荫蒂性生交片| 福利视频免费在线观看| 成人精品视频在线播放| 国产freexxxx性播放麻豆| 免费在线看黄色片| 妞干网在线播放| 91.com在线| 国产传媒久久久| 成 年 人 黄 色 大 片大 全| 日韩av高清在线看片| 免费网站永久免费观看| 国产美女永久无遮挡| 青草视频在线观看视频| 福利视频免费在线观看| 草草视频在线免费观看| 国产原创popny丨九色| 国产一区二区在线视频播放| av天堂永久资源网| 成人黄色片视频| 国产精品视频黄色| 黄色av免费在线播放| 国产免费又粗又猛又爽| 日韩成人av免费| 欧美与动交zoz0z| 91午夜在线观看| 久久婷婷国产精品| 亚洲精品www.| 在线观看17c| 国产精品久久中文字幕| www.日本xxxx| 亚洲色图欧美自拍| 国产一级不卡视频| 日韩avxxx| 色婷婷.com| 日韩不卡视频一区二区| 黄色一级片播放| 国产自偷自偷免费一区 | 少妇一晚三次一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品18| 日本在线xxx| 丝袜制服一区二区三区| 国产成人精品免费看在线播放| 成年人看的毛片| 性生交免费视频| 在线观看18视频网站| 国产免费毛卡片| 红桃视频一区二区三区免费|