Home>News Center>China
           
     

    Comment: Electricity agency lacks power
    By Li Shi (China Daily)
    Updated: 2005-03-06 01:48

    The new electricity supervision regulation which came out late last month was expected to sweep away legal obstacles in the way of the State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC), watchdog of China's power sector.

    Shao Binrong, deputy director of the SERC, speaks at a press in Beijing on Feb. 25, 2005. [newsphoto]
    However, on its release on February 25, it fell way short of public expectations.

    While legally equipping the SERC with the power to oversee the sector, the new regulation, which will take effect on May 1, fails to give the commission substantial power to nod approval to pricing and industrial investment, both being crucial powers for the commission to carry out independent regulation.

    China's market-orientated reform of the once-monopolized bloc of power industry started in the 1980s. In 1995, the Electricity Law was promulgated, which marked China's shift from administrative control to a law-based procedure regarding the management of the power industry.

    In 1997, the State furthered market reform of the sector, forming the State Power Corporation (SPC) and loosened the administrative reins on the industry.

    The reform accelerated two years ago, when the State Council issued a systematic reshuffling plan to spearhead industrial reform. Under the plan, the State split the SPC into 11 separate companies, including two grid corporations, five power generating groups and five other companies conducting power-related auxiliary business.

    Later in the same year, the SERC was established to unify the previously scattered supervisory power.

    Reflecting on the historical tracks of reform, we can find China has moved towards a liberalized regulation mode, in which an independent regulatory body supervises the industrial development, while the market largely decides the supply and demand of electricity.

    The liberalized regulation and independent supervision are a general practice in mature market economies.

    It is the right direction for China's reform.

    Analysts say the establishment of the SERC, the first independent regulator of China's network industries, marks a breakthrough in establishing a comprehensive power supervision framework in the country.

    To make the systematic innovation a real breakthrough, the supervisory role of the SERC must be fully brought out.

    So far, it has not.

    Now that the watchdog has been in place for nearly two years, people have heard stronger voices from the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), a major policy-making body of the country, than the SERC in major power-related matters, such as dampening investment heat and co-ordinating the price brawls between coal and power companies.

    The embarrassing role of the SERC stems from the 2002 reform plan, which stipulated that the SERC and NDRC share the power of pricing supervision.

    Pricing regulation is the most effective way of imposing industrial supervision. The lack of independence in this respect will sour the SERC's authority in future industrial regulation.

    According to the plan, the NDRC also has the exclusive power of making decisions on investment in the sector. SERC does not have a say in the process, further undermining its authority.

    Without giving the SERC the full power of supervision, it would be hard to realize the blueprint hammered out by policy-makers and industrial experts to establish a unified supervision network.

    People used to pin their hope on a law to render legal support for setting up such a framework.

    They certainly do not count on the 1995 Electricity Law, which was drafted at a time when the idea of independent regulation had not arrived in China.

    Back then, the administrative control remained the core part of the law. The sixth article of the law, for example, says the electricity management department under the State Council is responsible for the supervision and management of the nation's electricity affairs.

    The power of the electricity management department was later transferred to multiple central departments.

    Experts have long advocated the revision of the electricity law to solve the problem. Before it is revised, an interim regulation is most desired.

    For the SERC, the promulgation of the new electricity supervision regulation is vital.

    It needs a legal back-up for its role as an industrial supervisor. More importantly, since the Administrative Licensing Law took effect last July, which does not allow wilful licence issuance, the SERC urgently needs a law to legitimize its granting of electricity-related business licences.

    Now the new regulation has satisfied the SERC's desire to get legal back-up for its licence issuance, but fails to give it independent power of pricing supervision, let alone that of investment approval.

    It seems the new regulation is a result of compromise between the SERC and other government departments. Reports have it that in the draft of the regulation, it is stipulated the SERC shall play the role of pricing supervision in accordance with the regulation and relevant State Council policies. Since the NDRC reportedly insists that pricing concerns the overall operation of the national economy and should be put under its jurisdiction, the final version of the regulation parallels the NDRC with SERC to impose the power of electricity supervision.

    Without independent power of pricing supervision, it is hard for the SERC to fare well.

    This year, it is predicted that electricity consumption nationwide will increase by more than 10 per cent year-on-year. Competition is set to intensify. All this will pose a severe challenge for the SERC, which shoulders the responsibility of ensuring fair and orderly competition.

    The watchdog would have to count on the revision of the electricity law, hoping it would be granted stronger supervisory power.

    But will the new law, with an unknown birth date, make its hope a reality?



     
      Today's Top News     Top China News
     

    Wen lowers 2005 economic growth target to 8%

     

       
     

    Agricultural tax to be scrapped from 2006

     

       
     

    Hu's vision for cross-Straits ties hailed

     

       
     

    Dollar decline won't lead to forex sale

     

       
     

    Liu Xiang wants more time and privacy

     

       
     

    Wounded Italian journalist returns home

     

       
      Hu urges peaceful reunification
       
      China targets 8% growth for 2005
       
      China vows to keep yuan basically stable
       
      China scraps agricultural taxes in 2006
       
      Mainland works to resume cross-Strait talks
       
      Vision for developing ties hailed
       
     
      Go to Another Section  
     
     
      Story Tools  
       
      News Talk  
      It is time to prepare for Beijing - 2008  
    Advertisement
             
    无码精品久久久天天影视| 中文字幕日本在线观看| 精品中文高清欧美| 久久久无码精品午夜| 在线a亚洲v天堂网2019无码| 精品久久久久久久久中文字幕| 911国产免费无码专区| 亚洲午夜国产精品无码| 天堂在/线中文在线资源官网| av潮喷大喷水系列无码| 亚洲熟妇无码AV在线播放| 最新中文字幕在线| 无码中文字幕乱在线观看| 免费无码一区二区| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站| 久久亚洲AV成人无码软件| 久久伊人中文无码| 中文字幕日韩在线| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 亚洲Aⅴ无码一区二区二三区软件| 色综合久久无码中文字幕| 精品欧洲av无码一区二区14| 中文字幕在线免费看线人| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 亚洲成A∨人片天堂网无码| YW尤物AV无码国产在线观看 | 亚洲精品无码午夜福利中文字幕| 99久久人妻无码精品系列| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久久| 精品欧洲AV无码一区二区男男| 中文字幕亚洲一区| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕日韩精品在线| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦在线视色| 中文字幕在线观看日本| 最好看更新中文字幕| 久久精品?ⅴ无码中文字幕| 久久中文字幕视频、最近更新| 亚洲天堂2017无码中文| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码| 亚洲一区爱区精品无码|