What's wrong with children loving their country and city?

    Updated: 2012-08-03 06:46

    By Eddy Li(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Recently, I met with some friends from Japan. The communication between us has always been open and free, so we also discussed some controversial issues. We had a chance to advance our points of view over the Diaoyu Island issue. And later on, we came to the question of why we are sticking so "stubbornly" to our views about the dispute. Coincidentally similar answers were given: both parties love their country, when it comes to national dignity and interest. The sentiments were more or less the same, a conviction to everything to defend our countries without compromise.

    During the discussion, a friend of mine asked, "To have ardent love for the motherland and nation is a core value universally acknowledged. Then why should some Hong Kong people be opposed to the subject of national education which the HKSAR government intends to implement?" The question put me in a rather awkward situation because I didn't know how to respond.

    Indeed, if the moral and national education curriculum can teach the future masters of Hong Kong about their country and cultivate their patriotic sentiments, what's the problem of implementing it? The future of our country and the city of Hong Kong will always need successors, and the next generation of successors will do nothing contributive if its leaders don't feel the passion for our country and our city. Strangely, however, whenever it comes to the issue of the curriculum, some people feel such intense dislike that they have mounted protest marches in opposition. From a broad, international perspective, it is a phenomenon difficult to understand.

    The demonstrators choose to ignore not only the explanations by the Hong Kong SAR government but also the opinions of groups which favor implementation. They hold to their views stubbornly for only one stated reason, claiming they are opposed to brainwashing.

    Equating national education to brainwashing is definitely misguided. The current protesters, throughout the demonstration, pointed only to a single object in which their opposition was crystallized, a brochure introducing the so-called "China Mode". The opposition protesters complained that some of the contents are slanted so as to make ideals appear to be the reality. Everyone has the right to his point of view. When we agree to disagree, we can have discussions and put forward suggestions. I believe, these suggestions are highly welcomed by the Education Bureau. But we also have to understand that the manual is merely a small part of the whole concept of moral and national education. As the proverb goes, one swallow does not make a summer. Therefore, we have no reason to refute its educational value and virtue just because we doubt one single aspect of its contents.

    Hong Kong has always attached great importance to human rights and freedoms. The notion of "independent minds" is a core value of the city. If freedom of thought is right and a virtue for everyone, then why, "uniquely", should the thought of moral and national education be deemed unacceptable? Although people have the right to criticize the system, wouldn't it be better if they knew and understood what they are criticizing? Information about the country should be accessible to students to help them understand their country. Additionally, teachers and parents should give guidance to help children to think independently and analyze subjects from different perspectives. Students should be entitled to decide and judge for themselves what is beneficial and what is not. In this case, we cannot cut off all normal approaches to assist them to understand what is happening to the country, perhaps even to keep the information away from students entirely. It doesn't make sense to assert that "being exposed to a curriculum equals being brainwashed".

    Through the implementation of the subject, the future masters of Hong Kong will be able to know about history and the condition of their country. It will make them aware of the current relationship between the mainland and Hong Kong. Having the general knowledge about the country in mind, the future successors can have a better understanding of the shortcomings of the mainland and Hong Kong and how to make improvements. In the future, when they are ready to succeed to the responsibility of making their contributions to the society, these successors will be able to advance the country and Hong Kong to even higher levels of advancement.

    The author is vice-president of the Chinese Manufacturers' Association of Hong Kong.

    (HK Edition 08/03/2012 page3)

    亚洲精品无码不卡在线播放HE| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 亚洲电影中文字幕| 久久av无码专区亚洲av桃花岛| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区| 老司机亚洲精品影院无码| 少妇无码太爽了在线播放| 欧美乱人伦人妻中文字幕| 黄A无码片内射无码视频| 成人无码AV一区二区| (愛妃視頻)国产无码中文字幕| 五月天无码在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本| 最近中文字幕高清免费中文字幕mv| 成人午夜福利免费无码视频| 无码GOGO大胆啪啪艺术| 亚洲色中文字幕无码AV| 免费一区二区无码东京热| 天堂√最新版中文在线天堂| 中文字幕理伦午夜福利片| 国产高清无码二区| 久久久久亚洲AV片无码下载蜜桃| 亚洲精品无码久久久久久| 最新中文字幕av无码专区| 中文字幕在线观看国产| 一级中文字幕免费乱码专区| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲日韩| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕图| 亚洲国产综合精品中文第一| 亚洲精品欧美精品中文字幕| 中文无码制服丝袜人妻av| 中文字幕在线观看有码| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看下载| 国产精品无码免费播放| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩软件| 亚洲高清无码专区视频| 欧美 亚洲 日韩 中文2019| 午夜不卡无码中文字幕影院| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品有坂深雪| а√在线中文网新版地址在线|