久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

What should the Fed do to jump-start US economy?

Updated: 2012-08-17 06:48

By Lawrence J. Lau(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

What should the Fed do to jump-start US economy?

While the US economy is no longer contracting - the real rates of growth have been positive since the third quarter of 2009 - the economic recovery has been exceptionally slow, despite record low rates of interest. The unemployment rate has stayed stubbornly high above 8 percent and is unlikely to fall significantly in the near term. The effectiveness of an easy monetary policy is in serious doubt.

In fact, the real rate of interest, the difference between the nominal rate of interest and the rate of inflation (measured by the consumer price index, or CPI), has been negative since November 2009. The economy is in a classical "liquidity trap." As is well known, one can pull on a string but not push on a string. Further lowering the rate of interest and release of liquidity in the US is unlikely to increase domestic investment, especially given all the uncertainties of this presidential election year.

The problem is that expectations can be self-fulfilling in the absence of any clear signal of change. If firms and households expect the economy to do terribly and act accordingly by reducing investment and consumption, the economy will indeed turn out to be terrible, fulfilling their expectations. This may lead them to expect a further worsening of the economy, and act accordingly, resulting in an even further decline of the economy, creating a self-perpetuating downward spiral in which negative expectations lead to declines and declines feed into even more negative expectations.

This has been, unfortunately, the story of the Japanese economy since its property price bubble burst in 1990. In order for expectations to change, there must be some concrete action that can act as a signal to the firms and households that the economy will be improving soon.

The world economy has already experienced both "Quantitative Easing I (QE-I)" and "Quantitative Easing II (QE-II)" operations by the US Federal Reserve Board (Fed). However, these operations did not seem to have done the US real economy much good. Much of the excess liquidity generated went overseas, driving up exchange rates and asset prices elsewhere. If the US had some form of capital control, so that the excess liquidity had to be kept and used within the US, it might perhaps have driven up some US asset prices and led to some additional domestic investment. However, that has not been the case.

At this point, only an expansion of real aggregate demand can serve as an effective signal for a change in expectations. However, it does not appear likely that the US Congress will authorize a fiscal expansion, even though that is exactly what is needed. There is ample excess capacity in the US economy, especially in the construction sector and the building materials sector. What the US government should undertake is an expansion of capital expenditures focused on public infrastructure on the one hand and a reduction in recurrent expenditures on the other. It should be supporting growth and imposing austerity at the same time.

How can this be done, especially with a Congress that is unwilling to authorize any increase in expenditures, whether capital or recurrent?

One possibility is for the Fed, in its next round of bond buying, to purchase new long-term bonds, issued by the individual states and earmarked for public infrastructure in the respective states. For example, the Fed can offer to purchase a total of $600 billion worth of new state bonds from the individual states, roughly in proportion to the population of each state, with the proviso that the proceeds must be used for infrastructural projects - either new construction or maintenance and upgrading of existing infrastructure - and cannot be used to pay for the recurrent expenditures of the state (e.g., salaries of the state government employees) per se.

These infrastructural projects may include roads, highways, railroads, airports, seaports, bridges, dams, and even hospitals and schools, etc. This will increase aggregate demand, GDP, and employment in every state, and will be utilizing basically the excess capacity in the construction sector and the building materials sector and hence are unlikely to be inflationary. Moreover, such investments will turn out to be socially productive, given the current deteriorated state of US public infrastructure, by enhancing the rates of return of past, present and future private investment.

In addition, these expenditures on infrastructural projects will not increase the federal budget deficit; on the contrary, because of the GDP and employment that they will create in every state, they may actually help to reduce the federal as well as state budget deficits.

Of course, the individual states will have to pay the interest on the bonds and eventually repay the principal. However, the long-term rate of interest is at a record low and state revenues will benefit directly from the increased GDP and employment in the states. In addition, the states can take a long period, say 30 years, to repay the bonds, during which time the state economies will have recovered sufficiently. I believe all 50 states will support such a bond purchase plan. (In fact, a similar plan can be used for Greece, so that while Greece needs to reduce its recurrent government expenditures, it can still undertake some capital projects so as to maintain some economic growth and prevent unemployment from becoming too high.)

Another possibility is for the Fed to buy US mortgage loans or equivalently mortgage-backed securities at a discount. Owners of the mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities can be asked to bid competitively the percentage discounts that they are willing to accept. The Fed will purchase those with the highest percentage discounts up to the maximum amount for that particular tranche of loan/bond purchases, say, $100 billion. Since these mortgage loans are purchased at a discount, there will be room for the negotiation of work-outs with the actual borrowers, especially those who are owner-occupants, through a reduction of their loan principals.

Moreover, the remainder of the loan, which may still be higher than the market value of the home, can be refinanced at the current lower rate of interest and perhaps even with an extended maturity, thus significantly lowering the monthly payments for the same home mortgage. In this way, it may become possible for many such borrowers to avoid default and loss of their homes. Once such mortgage loan default problems can be resolved satisfactorily, these households will have greater confidence as well as resources to start consuming normally again. The Fed can repeat the same exercise with successive tranches of such purchases of loans and bonds.

The Fed has a great deal of latitude in deciding what types of bonds and/or loans to buy. Another possibility for increasing aggregate demand is of course to increase net exports. If the US were any other country, its central bank could just undertake a significant one-off devaluation of its currency, leading to a significant increase in its net exports and resulting in an increase in both its GDP and employment.

However, for various ideological and technical reasons, a direct intervention in the foreign exchange market is not an option for the US or for the Fed. The Fed can offer to purchase new bonds to be issued by the Export-Import Bank of the US, thus enabling it to finance exports and export enterprises with super-low long-term interest rates. However, it is not clear that there is that much room there for Fed action.

Thus, the US is left with two imperfect instruments - "persuasion" and "flooding the World with liquidity" - to try to devalue the US dollar relative to other currencies. Neither instrument can work perfectly. The rate of interest in the US is already as low as it can be, so it is not possible to induce much additional net capital outflow (and hence a devaluation) through a lower interest rate differential with other countries and regions per se.

It is true that the Chinese yuan and the Japanese yen have actually appreciated significantly against the US dollar in the past couple of years and the respective bilateral trade balances seem to have narrowed. However, this strategy has not proven to be effective against the euro (in part because of the European sovereign debt problem and the US' position as a safe haven for capital). In fact, the euro/US dollar exchange rate has recently reached a 24-month new high.

Eurozone countries, Germany and France in particular, are major competitors of the US in the supply of capital and technology goods (e.g., airplanes, automobiles, machine tools, tractors, etc.), and their exporters remain extremely competitive with US exporters in the Chinese, Japanese and other markets. It is possible that the US dollar may fall yet again relative to the euro when the European sovereign debt crisis is finally resolved.

However, a significant, effective devaluation of the US dollar against major currencies, even if it can be engineered, risks kindling inflation in the US not only through a rise in the price of imports (the US has been importing most of its consumer goods), but also through a rise in the prices of the major commodities, including oil, and possibly also through a rise in the US asset prices due to increased foreign direct investment in the US. Unless US net exports can be increased significantly as a result of such devaluation, there may actually be some risk of stagflation.

We have discussed two possible bond-buying programs the Fed can launch, that can result in an increase in aggregate demand directly and indirectly and hence improve the US economy. There are also other possibilities. It does not have to be "Quantitative Easing III (QE-III)", or in any case QE-III can take a very different form from QE-I and QE-II. The world economy desperately needs a healthy US economy and the whole world wishes the Fed every success!

Professor Lawrence J. Lau is a Hong Kong economist and former vice-chancellor of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

(HK Edition 08/17/2012 page3)

久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    久久色视频免费观看| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 老司机精品视频在线| 久久亚洲欧美国产精品乐播| 国产成人午夜精品5599| 中文字幕中文字幕在线一区| 一本色道久久综合亚洲91| 亚洲18影院在线观看| 日韩欧美一级精品久久| 国产黄色成人av| 一区二区三区不卡视频| 91精品国产色综合久久ai换脸| 精品一区二区av| 中文字幕亚洲成人| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区| 日本vs亚洲vs韩国一区三区二区| 久久综合中文字幕| av不卡免费在线观看| 日韩国产一区二| 国产日韩亚洲欧美综合| 91久久奴性调教| 久久激五月天综合精品| 日韩理论片网站| 欧美一区二区在线观看| 成人av在线一区二区| 天天色天天爱天天射综合| 国产欧美精品日韩区二区麻豆天美| 91丨九色丨国产丨porny| 日韩精品高清不卡| 国产精品美女久久久久久久久久久| 欧美在线高清视频| 国产精品一区免费视频| 亚洲影院在线观看| 久久久国产午夜精品| 欧美在线免费播放| 国产一区二区三区精品欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 裸体健美xxxx欧美裸体表演| 国产精品欧美久久久久无广告| 欧美性色欧美a在线播放| 国产综合久久久久久鬼色| 亚洲精品久久久久久国产精华液| 日韩欧美不卡一区| 色www精品视频在线观看| 九九久久精品视频| 亚洲综合激情小说| 国产欧美精品一区二区色综合| 欧美日韩亚州综合| 不卡的电影网站| 久久精品国产999大香线蕉| 亚洲老妇xxxxxx| 国产日韩欧美在线一区| 欧美顶级少妇做爰| 色婷婷国产精品久久包臀| 国产精品自在在线| 男女男精品视频| 一区二区三区在线视频免费观看| 国产日韩欧美不卡在线| 日韩一区二区三区在线观看| 色香蕉成人二区免费| 国产精品亚洲成人| 奇米亚洲午夜久久精品| 一区二区三区四区在线播放| 国产午夜精品久久| 欧美电影免费观看高清完整版| 欧美影片第一页| 波波电影院一区二区三区| 激情另类小说区图片区视频区| 午夜电影久久久| 亚洲美女区一区| 中文字幕+乱码+中文字幕一区| 日韩你懂的在线播放| 欧美日韩www| 91国偷自产一区二区三区成为亚洲经典 | 亚洲视频资源在线| 欧美韩国日本不卡| 亚洲精品一区二区三区99| 在线电影院国产精品| 欧美性感一类影片在线播放| 99精品久久99久久久久| 成人午夜伦理影院| 国产成人午夜高潮毛片| 国产一区二区三区四区五区入口| 美女久久久精品| 日日欢夜夜爽一区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区www在线| 亚洲人成网站在线| 亚洲视频在线一区观看| 亚洲欧美在线视频观看| 国产精品女主播在线观看| 国产人伦精品一区二区| 久久免费看少妇高潮| 精品黑人一区二区三区久久| 欧美一区二区三区在线看| 6080亚洲精品一区二区| 欧美久久久一区| 欧美人xxxx| 欧美久久高跟鞋激| 777a∨成人精品桃花网| 欧美日韩aaaaa| 51精品秘密在线观看| 在线播放一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区三区视频在线| 91麻豆精品国产91| 日韩欧美一区电影| 欧美成人bangbros| 精品国产免费人成在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久浪潮| 日韩欧美一区在线观看| 日韩午夜在线影院| 精品日韩在线观看| 久久久久久久久97黄色工厂| 国产日韩欧美高清在线| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲欧洲av在线| 一区二区三区中文免费| 午夜精品免费在线观看| 免费成人深夜小野草| 久久99九九99精品| 国产aⅴ综合色| 成人激情小说乱人伦| 一本久道中文字幕精品亚洲嫩| 欧洲精品中文字幕| 欧美一区二区在线免费播放| 2024国产精品视频| 国产精品理论片| 亚洲国产视频在线| 久久精品久久久精品美女| 国产精品1区二区.| 91在线云播放| 欧美日韩国产高清一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区免费高清| 久久久99免费| 亚洲欧美电影院| 日韩在线一区二区| 国产一区二区三区四| 91视频在线观看| 91精品国产色综合久久ai换脸 | 欧美成人aa大片| 国产欧美一区二区精品忘忧草| 亚洲免费在线看| 日本欧美在线看| 国产传媒一区在线| 色噜噜狠狠成人网p站| 91精品国产欧美日韩| 欧美国产精品中文字幕| 亚洲夂夂婷婷色拍ww47| 久久99国产精品久久| 99免费精品视频| 91精品国产一区二区| 中文字幕不卡在线| 调教+趴+乳夹+国产+精品| 国产精品综合网| 欧美三级电影在线看| 欧美成人高清电影在线| 最新日韩在线视频| 美女性感视频久久| 99久久99久久精品国产片果冻| 51午夜精品国产| 国产精品第一页第二页第三页| 婷婷丁香久久五月婷婷| 国产成人午夜精品5599 | 2021久久国产精品不只是精品 | 亚洲欧美日韩人成在线播放| 日本v片在线高清不卡在线观看| 东方欧美亚洲色图在线| 欧美电影一区二区三区| 国产精品视频一二三| 日韩一区精品视频| 99久久综合狠狠综合久久| 欧美精品亚洲二区| 国产欧美精品一区二区色综合朱莉| 亚洲高清在线精品| 顶级嫩模精品视频在线看| 91精品婷婷国产综合久久性色| 国产精品免费aⅴ片在线观看| 免费高清成人在线| 日本电影亚洲天堂一区| 国产免费成人在线视频| 青娱乐精品视频| 色8久久人人97超碰香蕉987| 久久久久国产精品麻豆ai换脸| 亚洲成av人片一区二区三区| 99久久婷婷国产精品综合| 精品福利av导航| 日本大胆欧美人术艺术动态| 一本在线高清不卡dvd| 国产欧美视频一区二区| 蜜桃91丨九色丨蝌蚪91桃色| 欧美性一二三区| 国产精品白丝在线| 国产成a人亚洲| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲第一精品在线| 91在线免费播放| 中文字幕+乱码+中文字幕一区| 极品少妇一区二区三区精品视频| 欧美日韩免费高清一区色橹橹 | 国产精品美日韩| 国产一区二区三区四| 日韩欧美中文一区二区|