Unbalanced economy reduces upward mobility for young people

    Updated: 2012-11-24 06:37

    By Hong Liang(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Having lost the 2012 presidential election, the Republican Party of the United States might have also lost what some political analysts called "the culture war".

    In an commentary on CNN Opinion, contributor William Bennett, who was secretary of education during part of the Reagan administration, cited a breakdown of election exit polls and contended that the Republicans have lost touch with young people between the ages of 18 and 29.

    The Republican's perceived stance of siding with business is losing appeal among young voters. More and more of those voters favor socialism to capitalism, according to Bennett. He noted that results of a Pew Research poll taken in 2011 showed that 49 percent of Americans aged 18 to 29 have a positive view of socialism while just 46 percent have a positive view of capitalism.

    Reading this made me wonder if the decidedly pro-business Hong Kong government has also lost a culture war when the young people of this free-market economy are becoming increasingly agitated by what they see as the failure of free market forces, favoring only the super-rich who make up one or two percent of the population. The government has conceded that its traditional hands-off social and economic policy is showing its age. But it has disappointed increasingly impatient young people by failing to articulate a credible vision for change.

    Nobody in Hong Kong is known to have polled our young people's views on capitalism. Past success seems to have convinced policy makers that capitalism, in its rather elementary form, is best for Hong Kong.

    It is with a sense of pride that the government talks of itself as the "facilitator" of economic development. In its narrower sense, the "facilitator" does not consider a matter for its concern the distribution of the fruits of economic growth. Instead it trusts market forces to ensure a trickle down of wealth. But the notion that creating an economic environment that allows the top one percent of the population to get richer will increase employment and raise workers' wages has proven to be wrong in Hong Kong and elsewhere.

    To be sure, unemployment has not been too big an issue in Hong Kong in the past several years. But what people consider as "good" jobs, which pay decent salaries and promise prospects of reasonable career advancement, are becoming scarce outside the confines of the financial and property sectors. This has greatly dampened the hopes and expectations of a growing number of families, especially those in the middle-class struggling with the escalating apartment rental and property prices.

    Although the economy is growing, it is widely seen to have benefited only the small minority at the top of the economic ladder. Indeed, the wealth gap has been widening through the destruction of the middle class by the unbalanced economic structure that is too dependent on finance and property.

    Capitalism in Hong Kong is not entirely without heart. Other than favoring businesses, the government traditionally has focused its social services spending on providing housing and other subsidies to the poorest segment of the society. Nearly half the population is now housed in government-built apartments at heavily subsidized rents. Like all Hong Kong citizens, these individuals enjoy nearly free medical service and 11 years' of free education for their children.

    In the past, many entrepreneurs, business leaders, professionals and senior civil servants came from modest families in government housing estates. In those days, the manufacturing-based economy was conducive to social mobility. Capitalism, even in its rudimentary form, worked in Hong Kong and market forces could be counted on to facilitate an acceptable trickle down of wealth.

    But the young people of today are frustrated to see that the door for social and economic advancement is closing on them through the functions of the unbalanced economy. I remember that as a younger man in the early 1980s, I once felt immensely proud to be a Hong Kong person walking down the cavernous Central subway station thinking that I had contributed, even in some remote way, of making this happen. I wonder if there is anything in Hong Kong that can make a young man feel as proud of himself and as confident about his future. If you can, please let me know.

    The author is a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 11/24/2012 page3)

    精品人妻无码区二区三区| 日韩免费无码一区二区三区| 无码人妻久久久一区二区三区| 国产久热精品无码激情| 亚洲欧美成人久久综合中文网 | 日木av无码专区亚洲av毛片| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 人妻无码一区二区三区AV| 天堂中文8资源在线8| 无码AⅤ精品一区二区三区| 十八禁无码免费网站| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区四区| 中文字幕人成高清视频| 精品无码人妻一区二区三区品 | 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看你懂的| 日本公妇在线观看中文版| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区在线播放 | 国产高清无码毛片| 日韩人妻无码精品久久免费一| 日韩a级无码免费视频| 最近中文字幕免费2019| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码APP| 亚洲精品无码久久毛片| 精品无码久久久久久尤物| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV手机麻豆| 中文字幕日本高清| 中文字幕亚洲色图| 中文字幕欧美日韩| 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站| av区无码字幕中文色| 久久综合中文字幕| 久久久久综合中文字幕| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 在线观看中文字幕码| 69堂人成无码免费视频果冻传媒| 国产成人无码AV麻豆| 亚洲综合无码AV一区二区| 伊人久久综合无码成人网| 亚洲av永久无码精品秋霞电影影院 | 亚洲欧美日韩一区高清中文字幕| 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕系|