A rude awakening for under-achieving political parties

    Updated: 2012-12-01 05:36

    By Yang Sheng(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    A recent survey by the Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies (HKIAPS) of the Chinese University of Hong Kong found that 70 percent of the 800 respondents thought political parties in general, were not performing as well as they did 10 years ago, while less than 5 percent said the parties' overall performance was satisfactory. The political implication of this revelation deserves careful study.

    First, the poor performance of Hong Kong's political parties as a whole is the main reason their popular recognition is so low. The survey shows 70 percent of respondents said their impression of the parties' performance in general was not as favorable compared to a decade ago, while 17.3 percent found no change in the past 10 years, and only 8.6 percent of respondents thought the parties' performance was better. In terms of public satisfaction for political parties' performance, 50.3 percent of respondents rated them as "average", 42.1 percent unsatisfied and merely 4.6 percent were satisfied.

    It also found 56.5 percent of respondents believed the parties could not make tangible contributions to society because they were constantly fighting one another; only 17.9 percent disagreed. As for the reasons why people join political parties, 45.2 percent thought the primary reason people joined political parties was to profit themselves rather than to serve the public interest. Only 14 percent did not take that view; and 38.4 percent chose "50/50".

    Public expectations for the future of political parties' are not encouraging either, with 47.9 percent expressing pessimism and only 10.1 percent describing themselves as optimistic, while 39.3 percent went for "half and half".

    These results show Hong Kong residents are pessimistic about the current state of political parties mainly because of their disappointing performance, for which the public cites the parties' obsession for bickering as the principal cause. A ready example of what people mean can be found in frequent self-serving attempts by certain parties to prevent the Legislative Council (LegCo) from green-lighting government policies aimed at benefiting the public.

    Second, radical opposition parties have become a force to be reckoned with in Hong Kong, an alarming development people should not take lightly. Although the HKIAPS survey shows weak popular support for political parties across the board, with 59.8 percent of the respondents saying none are worth supporting, it is still worth noting that out of the 10 parties covered in the survey, the Civic Party (CP), People Power (PP) and the League of Social Democrats (LSD) are ranked third (5.1 percent), fourth (4.2 percent) and eighth (1.5 percent) respectively in terms of support. Together these three radical opposition parties boast more popular backing (10.8 percent) than either the No 1 party, the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB, 10.6 percent), or No 2 the Democratic Party (DP, 7.5 percent), which is considered a moderate opposition party.

    With the support of their base, the radical CP, PP and LSD have succeeded in disrupting the administrative process of the SAR government repeatedly in recent years, such as by delaying the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge construction project, blocking the government reorganization plan and stalling the legislative process to approve funding for the Old Age Living Allowance for elderly residents in need. Therefore it is necessary to undercut their political energy by weakening their popular support, because lobbying and compromises cannot convince them to change course.

    Third, political parties that love the country as well as Hong Kong still have a long way to go in terms of growth and maturity. These parties, with the exception of the DAB (on top with 10.6 percent support), did not fare particularly well in the HKIAPS survey, with the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions in fifth place (2.1 percent), the Liberal Party seventh (1.7 percent) and the New People's Party ninth (0.8 percent) among 10 covered in the survey.

    There are multiple reasons behind such disappointing results as far as popular support for these parties is concerned. The leading external cause is that it is very difficult for the parties to keep a balance between supporting the administration of the current CE and principal officials, and maintaining effective supervision on the government. In other words, failure to balance support for the government and relaying public opinions well tends to cost these parties popular support.

    As for internal causes, all these parties suffer from inadequate political skills among their membership in general, which does nothing to improve their public image and make it hard for the masses to feel drawn to them politically.

    The author is a veteran in current affairs commentary.

    (HK Edition 12/01/2012 page3)

    亚洲Aⅴ无码专区在线观看q| √天堂中文www官网在线| 最近免费视频中文字幕大全| 91无码人妻精品一区二区三区L| 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产| 欧美 亚洲 日韩 中文2019| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区 | 一本加勒比hezyo无码专区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码二区| 欧洲Av无码放荡人妇网站| 亚洲看片无码在线视频| 日本高清免费中文在线看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜乱一区三区 | 久久久久久国产精品免费无码 | 无码精品视频一区二区三区| 合区精品中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻中文AV不卡专区| 久久无码精品一区二区三区| 99热门精品一区二区三区无码| 亚洲AV永久青草无码精品| 久久无码AV一区二区三区| 中文亚洲日韩欧美| 最近中文字幕免费大全| 线中文在线资源 官网| 日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕| 久久亚洲春色中文字幕久久久| 欧美日韩久久中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码一去台湾 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文在线制服| 在线综合亚洲中文精品| 中文字幕日本人妻久久久免费| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 亚洲精品一级无码中文字幕| 中文字幕丰满乱子无码视频| 人妻中文无码久热丝袜| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦下载| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 色综合网天天综合色中文男男| 久久精品一区二区三区中文字幕|