Gun control in the US is long overdue

    Updated: 2012-12-29 07:54

    By Richard Harris(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    It comes as a shock if you get to know how liberal are the gun laws in the United States. Three generations have grown up in Hong Kong barely seeing a gun, except in movies or as a discreet part of a policemen's uniform. Indeed we even ban fireworks!

    We have missed nothing. I well remember the famous Gilbert U representing Hong Kong, coming 29th in the world in the 1988 Olympics in the free pistol shooting competition. Not bad for a small territory with severely restrictive gun laws.

    There really is no reason for an individual to own a gun outside an official gun club. There are, in fact, some 12 gun clubs in Hong Kong, seven of them being public sector clubs, so we have plenty of opportunity to indulge in high-minded weapon shooting. Innocent pursuits like target shooting and even rural countryside pursuits such as hunting small furry animals could all be controlled by a club check in and check out system. Clubs are usually good at self-policing as it is in their interest to obey the rules. They are likely to know better the mental stage of their members than any system and to provide a circuit breaker to impulsive action.

    There is no reason to own anything more aggressive. Apart from insecure individuals wanting to emulate Rambo or James Bond, it appears strange for individuals to want to own an automatic assault rifle that can fire 800 rounds a minute at a muzzle velocity of around 1 km/second.

    To use such a weapon you need a big supply of ammunition. E-Bay is a good place to buy a high capacity gun of 50-100 rounds per minute. It appears that the gunman in Connecticut was able to acquire soft nose bullets, which deform on impact creating horrific wounds even if the shot is inaccurate. There is only one reason to own this hardware and that is to kill people, easily.

    Opponents of gun control abuse the US Constitution by using the cry of "unconstitutional" as a good one to attack gun control proponents. The famous Second Amendment to the constitution was passed as follows: "a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

    It all depends where you put the punctuation. The US Supreme Court Justice, Warren Burger, a conservative Republican, interpreted the Second Amendment with the focus on the preservation of a well-regulated militia (now the police or the National Guard) rather than each individual. In 2008, the US Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the word "people" as "individuals", but this was passed by 5-4, which is not a judgment that cannot be overturned by another court.

    The amendment was written by a developing society in a hostile territory when marauding aboriginals were attacking individuals in isolated homesteads. It referred to low technology muzzle loaded weapons with dubious accuracy, even at close range. In the last hundred years, our technology has become much better at killing people. What seemed like a virtue in the old days is now a burden. The US constitution is living and evolving with society, passed by the Congress and the Congress can repeal. If it is in the will of the American people that owning an assault rifle or a handgun makes no contribution to society, it can go.

    The last refuge of the gun lobby is that having a gun in your possession makes you less likely to be attacked. But if you shoot first it is murder and if you pull a gun on a gunman that could lead to your own demise. Only on TV do two protagonists hold each other at drawn weapons. In real life the first guy to get a clear shot pulls the trigger. The self-defence argument is self-defeating and bloody.

    No regulation is going to be enough to prevent a determined madman - the massacre last year of the young adult campers in Norway proved that. The incredible knife attacks on schoolchildren in the Chinese mainland last week proved that. But that is a poor excuse for a reason not to strictly regulate gun ownership. Regulation of lethal weaponry restricting use to those in public security is long overdue in the US. Regulation makes it much harder for a rouge gunman and acts as a circuit breaker on impulsive action.

    It is well known that Barak Obama is in favor of gun control - this may be his legacy. For many of America's children, it is no longer a political debate - it is their future.

    The author is chief executive of Port Shelter Investment Management.

    (HK Edition 12/29/2012 page3)

    www无码乱伦| 欧美中文字幕无线码视频| 久久中文娱乐网| 国产精品亚洲аv无码播放| 日韩三级中文字幕| 亚洲 欧美 国产 日韩 中文字幕 | av潮喷大喷水系列无码| 中文字幕亚洲无线码| 日韩亚洲不卡在线视频中文字幕在线观看 | 午夜亚洲av永久无码精品| 无码乱人伦一区二区亚洲一| 无码国内精品久久综合88| 中文字幕无码久久精品青草 | 国产成人无码精品久久久免费| 久久亚洲AV成人无码软件| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页| 亚洲免费日韩无码系列 | 精品人体无码一区二区三区| 无码国产精品一区二区免费3p| 免费无码又爽又刺激网站| 最近2019免费中文字幕6| 性无码专区| 特级小箩利无码毛片| 国产精品无码久久综合| 亚洲av无码潮喷在线观看| 最新高清无码专区| 精品无码一区二区三区在线| 熟妇人妻无乱码中文字幕真矢织江 | 伊人久久综合无码成人网| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩av乱码| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| √天堂中文官网在线| 亚洲精品成人无码中文毛片不卡| 成人午夜福利免费专区无码| 久久av无码专区亚洲av桃花岛| 无码人妻一区二区三区兔费| 亚洲国产精品无码av| 免费无码又爽又刺激网站| 国模无码人体一区二区| 亚洲av无码国产精品色在线看不卡| 久久无码高潮喷水|