New property tax sets a bad precedent

    Updated: 2013-01-04 06:36

    By Hong Liang(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    New property tax sets a bad precedent

    The surge in property prices in the past couple of years was certainly worrisome. It was widely considered as a major source of rising discontent among middle-class families who can no longer afford the dream of owning their own homes.

    For that reason, the latest government measures that include clamping down on excessive speculation and an initiative to build more affordable housing have received wide public support. But the government may have taken an essentially pointless and needlessly controversial step in the introduction of a new tax on the purchase of residential apartments by non-residents and corporations.

    The tax, at 15 percent of the purchase price, reportedly has significantly depressed demand for high-end properties. Luxury home sales reportedly dropped nearly 20 percent since the introduction of the tax and analysts said developers would need more time to sell. A developer was quoted as saying the tax has "interrupted" the sales plan of the 20 luxury apartments with a combined market price of about HK$2.5 billion. Because of the new tax, the developer said he has to delay the sales of those apartments till sometime next year.

    The effect of the tax is being felt mainly at the luxury end of the market. This is not going to do any good to the many prospective home buyers who won't afford those apartments even at reduced prices. What's more, developers have at their disposal sufficient resources to hold those apartments for rental rather than selling them at prices that do not yield a reasonable return.

    Meanwhile, developers are up in arms over the tax because it inhibits them from acquiring apartments in old city blocks for redevelopment. In a recent meeting with government housing officials, developers threatened to pull out of future city renewal projects, claiming that the tax has rendered those projects unprofitable by adding to the cost of acquiring old apartments for redevelopment.

    While the computation seems straightforward enough, we aren't so sure if the threat was real. We all know that the supply of properties in the city's choice locations is severely limited. There is no shortage of potential buyers who are willing to pay the tax-inflated price for the investment value of those properties.

    Accusing government officials of acting out of ignorance, the chairman of the powerful Real Estate Developers Association Stewart Leung was quoted as saying that no developers would be interested in further redevelopment. Let the government do it by itself, he said.

    Whoever undertakes the work, it doesn't really matter to the majority of potential homebuyers because the apartments in the inner city areas are mostly beyond their reach. If the tax succeeds only in dampening demand for high-end properties, it serves no real purpose.

    There are those who object to the tax on ideological grounds saying the discriminatory nature of the tax could set a dangerous precedent that could damage Hong Kong's status as an international business center. To preserve that status, the government has always stated the cardinal rule for ensuring a level playing field for all parties doing business in Hong Kong: All the laws, regulations and taxes are applied indiscriminately to all businesses and investors, local or foreign. The new tax stands out as an exception, critics said.

    We can understand the urgency to bring down property prices in Hong Kong to levels that are affordable to the many aspiring middle-class families. But we question if this controversial tax can serve any real purpose in the government's overall effort to achieving that goal.

    What's more, the challenge to Hong Kong's long-standing non-discriminatory business environment posed by this tax seems real enough. The Hong Kong economy is too externally oriented to entertain such a controversial tax. Let's not forget, the inflow of hot money seeking a safe haven during the turbulent times of the 1960s sow the seed of the financial center we have now.

    The author is a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 01/04/2013 page3)

    亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 小SAO货水好多真紧H无码视频| 久久国产高清字幕中文| 久久久久成人精品无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码日韩| 中文字幕日韩在线| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮视频| 久久无码高潮喷水| 亚洲欧美成人久久综合中文网 | 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区三区 | 国产精品一区二区久久精品无码 | 亚洲无码在线播放| 久久精品亚洲乱码伦伦中文| 亚洲精品欧美精品中文字幕| 18无码粉嫩小泬无套在线观看| 亚洲爆乳无码一区二区三区| 熟妇人妻中文a∨无码| 久久久这里有精品中文字幕| A级毛片无码久久精品免费| 无码精品久久久天天影视 | 国产久热精品无码激情| 中文字幕精品一区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区应用| 亚洲一区二区中文| 最近免费2019中文字幕大全| 最近2018中文字幕免费视频| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 最近2019好看的中文字幕 | 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 岛国无码av不卡一区二区| 日本无码小泬粉嫩精品图| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕| 中文无码喷潮在线播放| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区 | 无码人妻少妇色欲AV一区二区| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码绿巨人 | 亚洲AⅤ无码一区二区三区在线 | 精品成在人线AV无码免费看|