Ponder housing problems, but stick to our advantages

    Updated: 2013-01-10 06:14

    By Ken K. C. Tsang(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Soaring housing prices in Hong Kong and rising income lead many of our young people to envy the Singaporean Housing and Development Board (HDB) system, under which the government supplies affordable housing units to the market and, unlike Hong Kong, citizens may rather freely (in light of some minor restrictions) choose their own flats in terms of size and location. They may make use of their Central Provident Fund account to pay for the flats; and if that's not enough, the government may provide subsidies. The whole purpose behind their housing policy is to turn as many of the citizens into property owners as possible in spite of a scarcity of land resources in Singapore.

    Such an aggressive housing policy may sound foreign to many Hong Kong people, but it may be music to their ears, too. Eva Cheng Yu-wah, former Secretary for Transport and Housing and the chairperson of the Hong Kong Housing Authority, once openly commented that "the ownership of a house does not necessarily mean happiness." The mindset of the Hong Kong government is rather simple: As long as you have shelter, then you are doing okay. The public housing policy does not take people's sense of ownership, dignity, social integration and commitment to the city into account.

    Ponder housing problems, but stick to our advantages

    The result, sadly, is that our society is increasingly polarized. According to government's statistics, compared with 2001, there are more young people (25-34 years old) living with their parents in 2011, with males going up 13 percent and females a stunning 31 percent. The numbers clearly indicate that our young people's ability to move out has diminished significantly over the years. Domestic conflicts caused by cramped living spaces may be prolonged due to high housing prices and a long public housing waiting lists approaching 200,000 applicants.

    Former Chief Executive Donald Tsang could hardly comprehend the difference between owning a house and renting a house. Such a sentiment prevailed in the government until CY Leung came to power. But when he eagerly sought vacant land to build more public houses - I believe that he acted in good faith - he encountered stringent objections in the communities, among them were District Council members and private home owners.

    The origin of the problem is the stigma on rental public housing, which is what Singapore had made a great effort to avoid. In Singapore, many HDB flats are built quite near to private houses for the sake of class integration. The philosophy there is that ownership makes them behave responsibly toward their own properties and communities. The whole Singaporean housing policy is meant to be a social glue that integrates the low income and the rich; whereas in Hong Kong segregation is the phenomenon. What we lack is an ideology that places social cohesion on the top of the public housing policy agenda.

    Social changes seem to occur much faster than the Hong Kong government can comfortably cope with. Indeed, only in this generation women become very reluctant to marry men who do not possess property, whereas such a phenomenon was unknown to our parents, as many of them grew up in public estates.

    The kernel of the housing problem today is more psychological than social and economic, but a housing policy that merely aims at satisfying the basic human needs is hopelessly inadequate when most people keep on asking for more. Consequently, the housing problem that pushes down marriage and birth rates, and the problem of sustainability caused by an aging population, will fuse.

    That said, then should we go the Singaporean way? I'd say no. In Hong Kong, we still put our faith in market mechanisms. What we need is a thorough overhaul of the land and housing policy. Today, half of the population lives in public housing, that is to say, the private housing market takes care half of the population. We shouldn't let the huge demand for public housing blind us from the nature of the problem: Housing prices skyrocketed owing to tighter land supply over the last decade.

    Nevertheless, more new land will be granted in the future; and what is more, the "Hong Kong property for Hong Kong residents" condition will be a safeguard against excessive scalping. The high-premium-low-rent structure should be reviewed in order to encourage competition, hence lower sale price of newly built buildings. Hong Kong people need not envy the Singaporeans once the "invisible hand" works again. By then, the world-class quality of Hong Kong properties should be the envy of the world.

    The author is vice-chairman of D-Dong and a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 01/10/2013 page3)

    日韩欧群交P片内射中文| 人妻丰满熟妞av无码区| 无码人妻丰满熟妇精品区| 亚洲成a人片在线观看中文动漫| 国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩 | 无码精品蜜桃一区二区三区WW| 国产啪亚洲国产精品无码| а天堂中文在线官网| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区午夜| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区综合部| 中文字幕乱码中文乱码51精品 | 亚洲人成无码网站久久99热国产| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码下载| 久久男人中文字幕资源站| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 人妻无码精品久久亚瑟影视| 免费A级毛片无码专区| 亚洲AV永久无码精品网站在线观看 | 国产成人无码免费看视频软件 | 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区首JN| 天堂中文8资源在线8| 日本精品久久久中文字幕| 漂亮人妻被中出中文字幕久久| 日韩成人无码影院| 亚洲一本大道无码av天堂| 亚洲不卡无码av中文字幕| 天堂无码在线观看| 无码的免费不卡毛片视频| 刺激无码在线观看精品视频| 东京热加勒比无码少妇| 精品久久久久久无码免费| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看素人| 一区二区三区无码高清视频| 亚洲AV无码成H人在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合在线中文| 一本一道av中文字幕无码| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕69| 精选观看中文字幕高清无码| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看|