Strengthen control over subdivided units

    Updated: 2013-01-10 06:14

    By Eddy Li(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    A commentary written by a senior manager of a property agency - "Standardizing subdivided units in industrial buildings serves multiple purposes" - has aroused my interest. With the discussion of the Panel on Housing in LegCo, the issue is worthy of further probing.

    I empathize with many points mentioned in the article. In recent years, increasing cases of reconstructed industrial units appeared, even in the factory areas. These units, on one hand, bring more money to the building owners, and provide more affordable choices for low-income families on the other. The problem is, however, most of these buildings don't have complete fire service installations and equipment. Some staircases are filled with sundries; some industrial units are even divided into 46 parts. Once a fire breaks out, the consequence would just be disaster - the danger is obvious.

    The article also points out the necessity of transforming factories into residential buildings, effectively to relieve the intensifying land issues. The transformation is feasible only with help from the government, including professional advice, and related legislation. The policy put forward last September - to allow eligible industrial buildings to be converted for residential use - is aiming at providing small-sized flats in a very short time to relieve the pressure of housing supply, and, at the same time, bringing the wider issue under the government's jurisdiction.

    Strengthen control over subdivided units

    This is the reflection of the government's awareness of the severity of subdivided units in industrial buildings. These units are actually the outcome of a free market, effectively solving the housing problems for relatively poor families. Increasing such units represent the rising demand. As a result, rather than suppress them, the government should encourage the legalization of industrial subdivided units instead, under the Fire Safety (Buildings) Ordinance, of course.

    At the end of article, it suggested a "tolerable fee" should be charged from the building owners by the government, to encourage them to provide such flats and effectively use the lands, and to increase government income. Actually, the policy is even more concessional than that, charging no such fees and allowing eligible owners to reconstruct without having to pay the premium.

    At the meeting of the Panel on Housing on Jan 7, the government clearly admitted the value of subdivided units in factories and said that the authorities would not take comprehensive action to forbid them. Some people might be optimistic about their legalization.

    From my point of view, however, the legislation won't be that easy. On top of government policy and public support, there are many ordinances to follow. According to Building (Planning) Regulations, "No part of any room used for habitation shall be more than 9 meters, measured within the room, from a prescribed window which faces directly into the external air". As for kitchens and bathrooms, windows are required. That is to say, the residential lighting requirements are stricter than those for industrial buildings.

    If under the current lighting requirement, how many subdivided units are actually qualified? And what should we do if they don't? We must abide by the law. Therefore, if regulating actions are imposed on these units, most of them would not pass the censorship; even if the owners are willing to reconstruct, the requirements are too hard to reach, and the result might probably be the demolishment of more than 80 percent of them, "dishousing" lots of the inhabitants.

    Nevertheless, the regulation is necessary, for these units are violating the current ordinance for the use of industrial buildings. The real difficulty lies in the execution of related laws - this is also a hard nut to crack in the first policy address by CE Leung Chun-ying.

    The author is vice-president of the Chinese Manufacturers' Association of Hong Kong.

    (HK Edition 01/10/2013 page3)

    最近免费最新高清中文字幕韩国| 亚洲AV人无码综合在线观看| 色综合久久无码五十路人妻| 人妻少妇精品中文字幕AV| 色噜噜综合亚洲av中文无码| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线| 狠狠躁天天躁中文字幕无码| 91久久九九无码成人网站| 2014AV天堂无码一区| 日本乱中文字幕系列观看| 久久无码一区二区三区少妇 | 亚洲VA成无码人在线观看天堂| 青春草无码精品视频在线观| 无码日韩精品一区二区三区免费 | 中文字幕亚洲一区| 国产中文字幕视频| 一本大道久久东京热无码AV| 精品一区二区三区无码免费视频 | 日韩精品无码免费一区二区三区| 无码精品尤物一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码AV中文字幕电影网站| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区| 精品无码久久久久久久久久| 91久久精品无码一区二区毛片 | 亚洲AV永久无码精品一区二区| 色窝窝无码一区二区三区成人网站| 亚洲VA成无码人在线观看天堂| 最新中文字幕av无码专区| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩京东传媒 | 国产成人无码一区二区三区在线| 大蕉久久伊人中文字幕| 中文字幕在线最新在线不卡| 色综合天天综合中文网| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文 | 亚洲色无码播放| 中文字幕在线视频第一页| 在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片秋霞| 日韩精品无码人成视频手机| 13小箩利洗澡无码视频网站免费| 亚洲AV无码成人专区片在线观看|