'Big govt' choice of most HK people

    Updated: 2013-01-18 07:01

    By Hong Liang(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    The conservative Heritage Foundation of the United States has warned that Hong Kong could lose its top position on its list of world's freest economies if Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying continued to pursue "big government" policies.

    Wednesday's Policy Address marked the first time many Hong Kong people have heard that their leaders have listened to people's complaints and taken bold steps to abandon the traditional social and economic policies of minimal intervention. Thanks to the Heritage Foundation, we now learn that our government has come around to the view that many old policies are no longer valid in this era.

    But die-hard defenders of capitalism in its most basic form practiced in Hong Kong and praised by fundamentalists around the world need not despair. A big government in Hong Kong is severely constrained by the discipline of the balanced budget and adherence to the low tax regime that are enshrined in the Basic Law.

    As such, the government can neither raise taxes or borrow money to finance its recurrent expenditures. In the past, some capital projects, notably the Mass Transit Railway, were financed, at least in the initial stages, by syndicated bank loans and the issue of a mix of long- and short-term fixed interest debt instruments guaranteed by the government. The government also issues short-term notes to cover occasional month-to-month budgetary shortfalls. Despite all that, the government has remained effectively debt-free, while maintaining a sizable fiscal reserve that can cover more than 12 months of expenditure.

    Some economists hold the view that such a large fiscal reserve is not necessarily a good thing. They suggest that the government should spend part of the funds held in reserve to improve social and medical services. Unsurprisingly, such a radical idea is gaining little traction inside and outside the government, which would rather return part of the fiscal surplus to the people through tax rebates or cash handouts.

    So, where is this "big" government? Nothing that Chief Executive Leung has done so far signals a sharp departure from the established economic policy. He has introduced a few measures seeking to dampen the overheated property market. More important, perhaps, is that under his direction, the government is studying ways to help diversify the economy from its over dependence on finance and property.

    Such thinking truly represents a drastic departure from the government's traditional policy of never favoring any particular industry, believing that the private sector should be a better judge of which sector will have a better chance of success. The government prefers to be the facilitator rather than the initiator.

    But more and more economists are urging the government to become more involved in setting the direction for future economic development, because private businesses are either unable or unwilling to make long-term investment in developing new industries while they can make short-term gains in investing in properties or various financial assets.

    The resulting imbalance of economic growth has widened the wealth gap to levels that are deemed to be a glaring social injustice. What's more, the dominance of these capital-intensive activities in the Hong Kong economy has greatly inhibited social mobility by denying a chance for people in the lower- to middle-class to move up the social ladder.

    The problem is exacerbated by escalating property prices that deny more and more people the opportunity of owning their own apartment. As tenants, they find that their quality of life is deteriorating as they are being forced by rapidly rising rents to move to lower-quality housing farther away from the city center.

    Hong Kong may be seen to be drifting away from the free-market principle as defined by such conservative think-tanks as the Heritage Foundation. But it will be the choice of the majority of Hong Kong people because they are not getting much benefits from the free market.

    The author is a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 01/18/2013 page3)

    国产AV无码专区亚洲AVJULIA| 色综合久久中文色婷婷| 日本免费中文字幕| 日韩AV无码中文无码不卡电影| √天堂中文www官网在线| 久久久久无码中| 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜在线观看| 中文字幕视频一区| 久久中文字幕精品| 国精无码欧精品亚洲一区| 免费看无码特级毛片| 一本大道香蕉中文在线高清| 五月婷婷无码观看| 人妻aⅴ无码一区二区三区| 精品久久久无码21p发布| 最近免费中文字幕大全免费 | 国产高清中文手机在线观看| 成人午夜福利免费专区无码| 熟妇人妻无码中文字幕| 人妻丰满熟妇aⅴ无码| 日韩久久久久中文字幕人妻| 色综合久久中文字幕无码| 亚洲精品无码久久不卡| 国产亚洲精品无码拍拍拍色欲| 亚洲综合av永久无码精品一区二区| 最近中文字幕国语免费完整| 人妻丝袜中文无码av影音先锋专区| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕视频| 国产a v无码专区亚洲av| 国产在线精品无码二区| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久| 无码人妻丰满熟妇精品区| 午夜不卡久久精品无码免费| 亚洲日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 国产色综合久久无码有码| 亚洲色中文字幕无码AV| 亚洲一区爱区精品无码| 亚洲AV综合色区无码另类小说| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 色窝窝无码一区二区三区成人网站 | 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久|