久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

Room for improvement

Updated: 2013-01-24 05:51

By Hazel Knowles(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Room for improvement

Room for improvement 

Studies show the benefits of small class wane as children get older and that teaching styles and strategies are more important. All Photos Provided to China Daily

After persistent lobbying by teachers, the government has agreed to allow secondary schools to cut class sizes by up to four pupils. But is it enough to ensure the quality of education in Hong Kong, asks Hazel Knowles.

"Imagine an actor performing six or seven times every day, each time to a new and different audience, as well as spending the breaks in between learning lines for a new act or even to write a new play. It seems ridiculous, doesn't it? But sometime that's what my job feels like to me."

Gillian, a 38-year-old Hong Kong secondary school teacher, looks tired as she characterizes her working day.

"I feel like an over-worked performer. Standing in front of an audience of 35 to 40 teenagers hours every day, trying to keep them motivated and interested. It is hard work, mentally and physically draining," she says.

"I want to be a good teacher but with 35 and sometimes more in a class, it's not so simple. A class-size less than 30, ideally around 25, would be so much better.

Gillian, who has requested that we not use her real name, is reacting to the on-going debate over class sizes in Hong Kong. She claims her views are echoed by many of her colleagues who feel that the quality of education in Hong Kong's secondary schools is being compromised because there are too many pupils in classes, leaving overworked teachers little time to address the individual needs of students.

The Education Bureau says the current standard class size is 34, with two extra places allocated for students repeating years, bringing the total to 36. This is higher than class sizes in international schools, where 21 students per secondary school class is considered the norm.

In comparison, the Hong Kong International School and the Chinese International School claim an average of around 25 pupils per class, while the English Schools Foundation says its schools have maximum classes of 30.

Parents feel that 34 in a class is too many, according to a telephone survey conducted by the Hong Kong Institute of Family Education. The study revealed that 85 percent of respondents supported smaller classes.

According to the Hong Kong Professional Teachers Union (PTU), which claims to represent around 90 percent of all Hong Kong teachers, a class size of around 25 would be better for both teachers and pupils.

In recent months, the issue has become a hot topic as the government debated ways to address an expected drop of 11,000 pupil in the student population by 2016 brought about by a fall in birth rate at the beginning of this century.

Initially, the government attempted to solve the problem by suggesting schools cut the number of classes and offering 700 teachers voluntary retirement. It pointed out that smaller classes across all Hong Kong schools may leave fewer places at popular schools - which it said was a major concern of many parents who are already facing tremendous pressure over the shortage of secondary school places.

But with the population of students expected to creep back upwards from 2017 onwards, teachers and principals took to the streets, protesting that the government's plan would result in layoffs and setting off a brain-drain that would be impossible to reverse.

Educators pushed for smaller class sizes which they said would allow teachers to stay in their jobs while addressing the long-overdue issue of crowded classrooms.

In December, the Education Bureau announced a number of measures to solve the problem, including a deal which would allow secondary schools to cut class sizes by up to four places, down to 30 per class over three years.

But not everyone thought it went far enough. Following the announcement, PTU said that 91 of 110 headmasters the union had interviewed were not satisfied with the plan.

Supporters of small-classes argue that small is better in that it helps the students. Skeptics claim there are more cost-effective ways of improving the quality of education.

Two of the most comprehensive studies undertaken on class size, the STAR project in Tenessee, USA, and The Class Size Research project by the Institute of Education at the University of London, found that smaller classes resulted in more classroom engagement among pupils in addition to students receiving more and individual attention.

The director of the London study, Professor Peter Blatchford, later concluded in a subsequent paper that smaller classes at the secondary level were particularly beneficial to lower achieving students.

"This suggests that small classes can be a valuable educational initiative right through school, but could be particularly targeted, at secondary level, at lower attaining pupils," he said.

Those who are not convinced point to the fact that both the STAR and The Class Size Research project only looked at the effect on kindergarten and primary students and that other studies have shown the benefits wane as children get older and that teaching styles and strategies are more important.

Gary James Harfitt, assistant professor at the Faculty of Education at the Univeristy of Hong Kong, is a supporter of small-class after researching how it affects students in Hong Kong secondary schools.

"A small class allows the students to get more attention from their teacher and that is particularly good in language teaching. In English lessons where the class size has been reduced, students are much more likely to willingly participate.

"May be it is because they have to, but from my research and from talking to students, I know the students themselves think it very important.

"They say they feel more included in a small class; they feel part of the group and there is more of a sense of a community.

Harfitt believes the small classes better suit the recent curriculum reforms in Hong Kong which required students to be more creative and give more personal responses to more probing questions.

"It's logical that in a smaller class you can do that more easily. In a small class students are able to share, take risks and work together better than they would in a larger class," said Harfitt.

"We regularly hear the number 34 when talking about class sizes in Hong Kong, but I am not sure where this figure comes in. I have polled my masters class and they talk about class sizes of 38, 42 and upwards.

"Overseas studies have suggested the optimal class size is between 18 and 20. Now that is never going to happen in Hong Kong," he said.

Harfitt said although the government had taken on board research on small class teaching with young pupils at primary level, there was little initiative from the government over small-class in secondary schools. Some schools in Hong Kong had already adopted small-class policies, he said.

However, he stressed reducing class sizes would be beneficial only if teachers received appropriate training in small class teaching approaches, both at university and while in their jobs, and were given the opportunity to share and learn from each other.

"All the research that has been done suggests that teachers don't change their practices very much. That is why the government is wary about cutting classes, because the expense it will incur may not translate into results.

"I am all for small classes but it has to be done permanently and properly with everyone understanding what it means and not just cut class size because of demographic changes.

"This is a great opportunity to make classes smaller, but it's a move which requires more training, more professional development, more learning circles where teachers can sit and discuss and share their experiences."

Hau Kit-tai, professor of educational psychology at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, shares the view that to improve teaching quality, other factors such as reducing teaching load and raising teachers' salaries should also be considered as well as reducing class sizes.

Professor Hau pointed to the recent Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), an international study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) which compares the performance of the pupils aged 15 in schools in 70 countries across the world. It showed that in Asian countries and in Hong Kong, students were doing very well in general, he said.

However, Prof Hau pointed out that in the United States where class sizes were among the smallest, teachers' work loads were well above the OECD average, while salaries were below and fringe benefits were worse than the average.

"On the debate of class size, there are two schools of thought, equally quite vocal. One is that reduction of class size may not be the optimal way of using resources," he said.

"This means around the world, resources are limited, so you either put resources into reducing the class size, or you put it into improving teaching quality, for example by decreasing the number of lessons a teacher has to teach in a week, or with staff training, or increasing salary. In fact, research shows increasing salary is one of the most effective ways of improving teaching quality," he said.

Hau said in particular the study singled out Japan and the United States, both countries which are spending approximately the same amount of money on education per teacher-student ratio. But while the United States used the money to reduce class size, Japan used it to reduce the teacher's workload, he said, yet the report found that Japan was doing much better.

In a paper delivered to Legislative Council's Panel on Education in November last year, the Education Bureau stressed that effectiveness of small class room teaching (SCT) in secondary schools was in fact inconclusive from international studies.

"Besides, SCT is a method of teaching. Based on international studies, it is the most effective when students are small and its effectiveness tends to wane as students age. Celebrated educators have commented that the cost of SCT is high while its effectiveness is uncertain," it said.

"In considering whether to implement SCT in secondary schools, we must take into account the existing conditions of secondary schools, the teaching and learning environment as well as provision of support to secondary schools, overseas experience and resource allocation.

"We should also learn from the experience of SCT in primary schools and analyse whether secondary schools should, as in primary schools, reduce the class size across-the-board so as to make SCT practicable and sustainable in secondary schools."

Secondary school teacher Gillian does agree that addressing class size is not the one size fits all solution for Hong Kong schools but feels it would go some way to help her in her job and help her students.

"Yes, there are other things we can do to improve (our education system) but smaller classes would be one step in the right direction. I think I could do my job better with less pupils."

 Room for improvement

Some say reducing class sizes would be beneficial only if teachers received appropriate training in small class teaching approaches, both at university and while in their jobs, and were given the opportunity to share and learn from each other.

(HK Edition 01/24/2013 page4)

久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    91视频www| 精品播放一区二区| 日韩国产成人精品| 精品少妇一区二区三区日产乱码| 国产激情91久久精品导航| 中文字幕亚洲一区二区av在线| 色中色一区二区| 日韩在线播放一区二区| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩| 成人一道本在线| 亚洲午夜精品网| 欧美精品一区二区精品网| 国产99久久精品| 亚洲综合在线视频| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文不卡| 成人性视频免费网站| 亚洲国产精品麻豆| 久久久久久久久97黄色工厂| 一本大道久久a久久精品综合| 日韩和欧美一区二区| 国产欧美视频在线观看| 欧美亚洲国产一区二区三区| 韩国理伦片一区二区三区在线播放| 国产精品免费aⅴ片在线观看| 在线国产亚洲欧美| 国产在线观看一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区中文字幕在线| 日韩一二在线观看| 95精品视频在线| 美腿丝袜亚洲一区| 亚洲乱码中文字幕综合| 日韩女优视频免费观看| 97久久超碰精品国产| 另类小说图片综合网| 亚洲色图自拍偷拍美腿丝袜制服诱惑麻豆 | 天天免费综合色| 久久精品人人做人人爽97| 日本久久电影网| 另类综合日韩欧美亚洲| 亚洲乱码国产乱码精品精小说| 日韩精品综合一本久道在线视频| 99精品久久只有精品| 免费av网站大全久久| 亚洲精品欧美激情| 亚洲精品一区二区三区蜜桃下载| 色爱区综合激月婷婷| 国产在线一区观看| 性欧美疯狂xxxxbbbb| 国产日韩精品一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩大陆在线| 成人的网站免费观看| 久久99精品国产.久久久久久 | 麻豆精品视频在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美在线aaa| 精品久久久久香蕉网| 欧美午夜精品久久久| av欧美精品.com| 国产一区二区视频在线播放| 首页亚洲欧美制服丝腿| 亚洲精品久久7777| 欧美激情资源网| 欧美成人激情免费网| 精品视频1区2区| 一本色道**综合亚洲精品蜜桃冫| 国产一区二区三区精品视频| 日本女人一区二区三区| 亚洲综合999| 中文字幕日韩精品一区| 久久久久久久久久久久久夜| 日韩欧美色综合| 欧美性极品少妇| 91在线码无精品| 菠萝蜜视频在线观看一区| 激情综合五月天| 蜜乳av一区二区| 天堂一区二区在线| 亚洲福利视频一区| 亚洲人成精品久久久久久| 欧美激情中文不卡| 久久婷婷综合激情| 精品国产精品一区二区夜夜嗨| 欧美欧美欧美欧美| 欧美日韩精品系列| 91福利精品视频| 91蜜桃传媒精品久久久一区二区| 成人爽a毛片一区二区免费| 国产精品一区2区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频青涩| 蜜桃免费网站一区二区三区| 日韩精品成人一区二区三区| 丝袜美腿成人在线| 日日夜夜精品免费视频| 亚洲丶国产丶欧美一区二区三区| 一区二区三区在线观看视频| 日韩伦理电影网| 亚洲精品菠萝久久久久久久| 亚洲精品视频免费观看| 一区二区三区在线观看欧美 | 日本一不卡视频| 日韩精品每日更新| 奇米在线7777在线精品| 蜜桃精品视频在线| 久久99国产精品尤物| 久久99精品一区二区三区三区| 精品一区二区久久久| 久久成人免费网站| 韩国欧美国产一区| 国产露脸91国语对白| 国产美女一区二区三区| 国产大陆精品国产| 成人永久免费视频| aa级大片欧美| 色94色欧美sute亚洲线路一久 | 日韩午夜激情免费电影| 日韩欧美美女一区二区三区| 精品久久久三级丝袜| 国产肉丝袜一区二区| 国产欧美视频一区二区| 自拍av一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲.国产.中文慕字在线| 日本91福利区| 国产精品一二三四| 91亚洲国产成人精品一区二区三 | 国产精品美女久久久久久久| 亚洲人成小说网站色在线| 一区二区三区在线不卡| 婷婷成人激情在线网| 激情综合五月天| 播五月开心婷婷综合| 欧美性感一类影片在线播放| 欧美一三区三区四区免费在线看| 精品国产污网站| 国产精品电影一区二区| 亚洲成人激情自拍| 韩国三级电影一区二区| 97se亚洲国产综合自在线不卡| 欧美偷拍一区二区| 日韩精品一区在线观看| 国产精品久线观看视频| 亚洲国产另类精品专区| 精品一区二区三区日韩| 99久久综合国产精品| 这里只有精品电影| 国产农村妇女毛片精品久久麻豆| 一区二区三区四区精品在线视频| 蜜臀av一区二区在线免费观看 | 亚洲综合一区在线| 美女视频黄a大片欧美| 成人午夜精品在线| 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区三区在线| 日韩美女视频19| 美女视频黄免费的久久 | 99久久精品国产导航| 欧美日韩在线综合| 久久婷婷色综合| 亚洲一区二区三区激情| 国产一区二区在线免费观看| 色伊人久久综合中文字幕| 欧美一区二区三区不卡| 一区视频在线播放| 久久国产精品免费| 一本到三区不卡视频| 老司机精品视频一区二区三区| 99久久伊人久久99| 欧美一区欧美二区| 中文字幕永久在线不卡| 免费成人在线网站| 91丨九色丨黑人外教| 欧美大片免费久久精品三p| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区三区| 日韩电影一区二区三区| 99re这里只有精品首页| 精品欧美一区二区久久| 一区二区三区小说| 国产999精品久久久久久| 67194成人在线观看| **欧美大码日韩| 国产一区日韩二区欧美三区| 欧美日韩在线直播| 中文字幕中文字幕在线一区| 另类的小说在线视频另类成人小视频在线 | 毛片av一区二区三区| 色爱区综合激月婷婷| 国产午夜精品一区二区三区嫩草| 性做久久久久久久免费看| 91美女视频网站| 国产欧美一区二区三区网站| 六月丁香综合在线视频| 欧美日韩中文另类| 日韩一区有码在线| 国产美女久久久久| 日韩欧美国产综合一区| 亚洲一区二区成人在线观看| 成人黄色在线视频| 久久久亚洲高清| 久久精品国产**网站演员| 欧美老年两性高潮| 亚洲综合清纯丝袜自拍|