Police authority is unchallengeable

    Updated: 2013-01-30 05:31

    By Kwok Chung-hang(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Whistling into a police officer's ear at the top of one's lungs causes bodily harm without there being direct bodily contact and, therefore, is no different from (physically) assaulting a police officer. The latest court ruling on those issues was a much-needed departure from the lenient approach toward violent protesters of the past. If protesters are left to assault and/or verbally abuse police officers without consequence, Hong Kong will suffer as police officers will become reluctant to do their job when challenged by unruly individuals. Challenging police authority is challenging Hong Kong's public security. Therefore, for the sake of maintaining police authority and public security, it's necessary to punish those who affront police authority no matter what the excuse.

    Protesters use "human rights" as their excuse to challenge police authority without any regard for the rights of others to live peacefully. They believe their right to make trouble is more important than public security or any right of others for that matter.

    A middle-aged construction worker whistled loudly into the ears of five auxiliary policemen's ears during a protest rally on July 1 last year. He was charged with five counts of assaulting police officers. An Eastern Court magistrate found him guilty on three counts of assault last week but adjourned sentencing until March. Some people criticized the court ruling as "too strict" while the head of the Human Rights Monitor (HRM) described the ruling as "dangerous", arguing that it's difficult to determine "assault by sound" objectively. Many opposition legislators also fired broadsides at the court ruling. If such tirades against a district magistrate do not constitute shaking judicial independence and harming Hong Kong's core values, I don't know what does.

    The HRM chief completely ignored the legal boundaries and the impact of radical protesters' illegal behavior on Hong Kong's public security when he sided with those unruly individuals. The truth is the real "danger" is not the court ruling in this case but encouragement for radical behavior expressed by advocates of violent protests such as the HRM director. The Eastern Court magistrate found the defendant guilty of assaulting police officers because he whistled vigorously into their ears at close range and caused temporary deafness and/or ringing in their ears. His intent to cause bodily harm is obvious and he succeeded more than once. Assault can be battery or technical assault. In this case, the defendant is found guilty because of the latter. If the HRM chief is not convinced, he can ask someone to whistle into his ear really hard and see how it feels.

    Moreover, such public display of decidedly hurtful and provocative behavior is not only intended to intimidate individual policemen but also aimed at challenging the whole law enforcement apparatus. If no punishment is meted out on such criminal acts, the perpetrators would no doubt feel encouraged to go further down that destructive path at the expense of social order and public security.

    Hong Kong citizens have the freedom of procession and assembly, but it comes with certain responsibilities as well, the most fundamental of which being following relevant rules and he law. The police are responsible for maintaining public order around protest marches instead of stopping them, but certain protesters have become increasingly fond of challenging police officers on duty during protests in recent years and every time they accused the police of using excessive force while stopping them from breaking into government offices or deviating from the planned route of procession without permission.

    Their blatant hostility toward the police and growing penchant for physically assaulting as well as verbally abusing the young officers have inflicted enormous psychological and emotional stress upon them. Many police officers and their loved ones have complained at online forums about the abuse they have to endure on duty and wondered why some protesters have to be so violent and aggressive toward them.

    Hong Kong police are known around the world for exercising utmost restraint even when seriously provoked. Our frontline police officers have proven time and again their mettle as defenders of the public interest or ordinary, law abiding citizens as distinct from radical protesters who wantonly assault officers in pursuit of selfish goals at the expense of others. The fact is, the more the police hold back, the more daring and aggressive those unruly protesters become. This is not what the Hong Kong society wants, which is why the magistrate's ruling was made not a moment too soon.

    The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 01/30/2013 page9)

    久久亚洲AV成人无码| 中文字幕丰满乱子无码视频| 国产午夜无码精品免费看动漫| 伊人久久一区二区三区无码 | 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码下载| 久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码麻豆| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 四虎成人精品国产永久免费无码| 精品无码一区二区三区电影 | 国产免费无码AV片在线观看不卡| 最近中文字幕视频在线资源| 国产啪亚洲国产精品无码| 亚洲日韩精品无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 无码无套少妇毛多18PXXXX| 亚洲天堂中文资源| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲视频| 亚洲精品无码午夜福利中文字幕| 亚洲欧美中文字幕| 亚洲日韩中文字幕在线播放| 国产99久久九九精品无码| 亚洲国产a∨无码中文777 | 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区| 无码中文人妻视频2019| 五月婷婷无码观看| 久久亚洲AV永久无码精品| 本道天堂成在人线av无码免费| 亚洲成a人片在线观看无码| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 无码任你躁久久久久久老妇App| 最近中文字幕大全中文字幕免费 | 精品无码久久久久久久动漫| 无码精品A∨在线观看中文| 亚洲AV永久纯肉无码精品动漫| 中文字幕无码AV波多野吉衣| 免费无码一区二区三区蜜桃 | 国产成人综合日韩精品无码不卡| 久久中文精品无码中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久中文字幕 | 在线a亚洲v天堂网2019无码|