Capital gains tax may help curb growing home prices

    Updated: 2013-02-05 06:32

    By Ho Lok-sang(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Capital gains tax may help curb growing home prices

    Recently, the International Monetary Fund warned that Hong Kong's high housing prices pose serious danger to the economy. According to Demographia, an Illinois-based consulting company, Hong Kong remains the world's most expensive housing market, with homes costing 13.5 times the median annual income (before tax), up from 12.6 a year ago. This is much higher than Australian homes, which costs only 6.5 times median income, yet are similarly labeled "severely unaffordable" by the survey.

    A fairly common view is that the government should introduce measures to strike down housing prices so they become affordable. But striking down the prices with draconian measures will not magically increase supply. The measures end up clamping down demand haphazardly. For example, one possible way to help those who are waiting to buy might be turning existing owners into negative equity "owners", and to have banks foreclose and sell the properties cheaply to those who are waiting to buy. This has happened before. Fair-minded people know that this is both unfair and costly to society.

    Other people have come up with the idea of a mortgage tax, so that the mortgage payments become so burdensome that buyers lower their bids. This will certainly hurt the owners/sellers, but cannot benefit the buyers, because a mortgage tax cannot improve affordability.

    Still other people have come up with the idea of a vacancy tax, to force owners who are keeping their units vacant into selling. But the impact on actual supply would be quite small. Presently the vacancy rate, according to the Secretary of Housing and Transport, is only 4 percent, which is a fairly healthy rate and not excessively high. Although some developers have kept units off the market, others are selling units that have not yet been completed. Moreover, it would be very costly for the government to tax owners who have bought their units from developers and keep their units vacant.

    Accordingly, there is, in point of fact, not much that can be done to help homebuyers buy homes in the short term. The government is already doing its best to enhance supply to meet long-term demand. Trying to clamp down home prices one way or another goes against the market and cannot be justified.

    Instead of striking down home prices with draconian measures, the government could instead favor first-time buyers by availing them to a higher loan ration, which would make them more like investors or those who already own homes. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has already moved in this direction and can do more.

    Thus an across-the-board "demand management" (i.e. cutting demand) initiative will not help first time homebuyers. Demand management that helps first-time homebuyers must favor them at the expense of other homebuyers/investors. But arbitrarily punishing other homebuyers/investors really goes against the principle of protection of private property, which has been enshrined in the Basic Law.

    Instead of a vacancy tax, I would propose putting a cap on rates relief/concession on all residential properties owned by one owner rather than allowing a separate concession to apply to each of the properties owned. At the same time, disallowing homes owned by a company to enjoy the concession may also increase the cost of hoarding many residential properties.

    Finally, the government could also consider the introduction of a capital gains tax on properties that are paid on the realization basis. This is not so much to strike down the home prices as to make our tax system fairer. The government has been far too generous to the landowning class, who has reaped huge fortunes, largely at the expense of entrepreneurs and renters. A capital gains tax payable on realization of the capital gains, with exemption for owner-occupiers, would be both fair and efficient-provided that an annual allowance for inflationary gains ensures that purely inflationary gains are not taxed. To make things simple, I recommend an annual 10 percent gain to be exempt from the capital gains tax. The tax revenue collected could be spent on various social and infrastructure projects that benefit the community as a whole. Economic theory tells us that such taxes will not burden tenants, and allow the government to reduce profits tax rates, giving the economy a big push.

    The author is Director, Centre for Public Policy Studies, Lingnan University.

    (HK Edition 02/05/2013 page1)

    精品欧洲av无码一区二区| 99精品一区二区三区无码吞精| 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区| 99久久国产热无码精品免费久久久久 | 国产中文字幕在线免费观看| 中文字幕丰满乱孑伦无码专区| 亚洲精品无码久久久久去q| 精品亚洲成A人无码成A在线观看| 亚洲av永久无码精品网站| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 日韩va中文字幕无码电影| 亚洲av永久无码精品网站| 精品久久久无码中文字幕天天| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码| 人妻AV中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲 无码 在线 专区| 爆操夜夜操天天操中文| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 五月天无码在线观看| 日韩AV片无码一区二区不卡电影| 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av午夜国产精品无码中文字 | 久久无码人妻精品一区二区三区 | 天堂а在线中文在线新版| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区96| 久久ZYZ资源站无码中文动漫| 无码人妻AⅤ一区二区三区水密桃| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区不卡 | 性无码免费一区二区三区在线| 免费无码又爽又刺激一高潮| 最近中文字幕国语免费完整 | 中文字幕乱人伦| 国产仑乱无码内谢| 69天堂人成无码麻豆免费视频 | 久久久久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩 | 人妻少妇精品无码专区动漫| 免费无码一区二区| 亚洲精品无码久久久| 亚洲一级特黄无码片| 伊人久久无码精品中文字幕| 一级片无码中文字幕乱伦|