Hong Kong's burning issue of waste

    Updated: 2013-05-30 07:15

    By Raymond So(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Hong Kong's burning issue of waste

    Hong Kong is now facing a garbage handling crisis. According to estimates, if Hong Kong continues its garbage production rate, the three landfills will be used up in two to six years. The government is now strongly advocating three options as a solution. The first is a levy on garbage. The second is an extension of the current landfills. The third is the construction of a new incineration plant. Nevertheless, similar to other social issues, it is easier said than done. The three initiatives will not be welcomed by people, in particular those who reside nearby. The garbage problem needs a rapid resolution.

    Hong Kong is famous for its garbage production rate. Currently the majority of garbage transported to landfills is food leftovers and construction waste. This is no surprise. Because Hong Kong is a modernized city, people have more food than is actually needed. Construction waste is also a by-product of the rapid development of Hong Kong.

    The question is how to handle the garbage. In the old days, when land was not an acute problem, the traditional way was to locate a place far from people and use the site for dumping. The concept of landfill is to use technology to control the dumping process and make dumping less undesirable. However, this traditional way of handling garbage is no longer workable. Economic development has made Hong Kong short of land for landfill on a massive scale. Worse still, those landfills used to be far away from people, but now the adjacent land is inhabited. This makes the extension of existing landfills mission impossible. People who live close to the existing landfills suffer from the undesirable environment. There are already voices demanding the closure of landfill sites. Hence, the garbage problem cannot be solved with landfills anymore.

    The concept of a garbage levy is an attractive one. By placing up a levy on garbage handling, theoretically people will produce less rubbish. At least, that's the theory. No doubt a garbage levy will inspire people to produce less garbage, but the effectiveness of such a scheme is still uncertain. If the garbage levy is not substantial, there will be little incentive to reduce garbage. And, given the current political situation, a large-scale levy on garbage does not seem feasible. People may not like the idea, and the need to get enough votes from legislators can be a real challenge.

    The building of an incineration plant is a long-term solution to the garbage problem. In the past, Hong Kong also had incineration plants. But at that time incineration technology was not environmentally friendly. Incineration plants produced toxic residuals and the government decided to close down its plants. This unpleasant experience of incineration plants still lives in the memory of people. Given that and the fear of pollution, incineration plants are definitely not welcome solutions.

    However, technology has made incineration plants less undesirable. Many cities now have incineration plants, some even close to inhabited areas. According to some reports, modern incineration plants can burn garbage whereby the residual will be equal to 1 percent of the volume of the original garbage. The residuals will still need to be dumped at the landfills, but the amount will reduce tremendously. From this perspective, Hong Kong's having incineration plants would markedly extend the lives of its existing landfills. For example, if a landfill can only be used for one year, garbage treatment through incineration plants can extend the lives of landfills one hundred times.

    This provides an interesting discussion topic. If we have incineration plants, we need not find new landfill sites and the garbage problem can be solved. But building an incineration plant takes eight to nine years. Therefore, we can see a garbage levy and the extension of landfills as measures to buy time for the construction of an incineration plant. The real solution to the garbage problem resides with incineration plants, and the levy and landfill extensions are just short-term measures to cope with the garbage problem before the incineration plant can be operated. The trick is that the three measures are interlinked. If one link breaks, the whole solution will not be successful. In other words, the three measures represent one whole package to confront the garbage issue.

    The challenge lies in persuading people to adopt the three measures. People do not like paying more for garbage handling. People do not welcome landfill extension. And they actively dislike the idea of an incineration plant on their doorstep. The concept of NIMBY (Not-In-My-Backyard) is hard to deal with. One possible way to reduce people's resistance is to provide subsidies for those living near the incineration plant. The government can consider spending some of its garbage levy to subsidize the electricity charges of people living near landfills or the incineration plant. The trick is how to compensate those affected so that they can be more fairly treated.

    The author is dean of the School of Business at Hang Seng Management College.

    (HK Edition 05/30/2013 page1)

    色综合网天天综合色中文男男| 无码不卡亚洲成?人片| 中文有码vs无码人妻| 无码av不卡一区二区三区| 波多野结衣AV无码久久一区| 中文字幕一区二区三区永久 | 亚洲日韩v无码中文字幕| 亚洲色中文字幕无码AV| 中文在线天堂网WWW| 国产精品免费无遮挡无码永久视频| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码片| 99久久国产热无码精品免费| 成年无码av片在线| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 人妻中文字幕无码专区| 免费A级毛片无码鲁大师| 欧美在线中文字幕| 久久久久无码国产精品不卡| 特级无码毛片免费视频尤物| 中文字幕丰满伦子无码 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在线观看| 久久久久亚洲av成人无码电影| 亚洲国产精品无码久久98| 亚洲日本中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 亚洲乱码中文字幕综合| 全球中文成人在线| 精品无码免费专区毛片| 一级片无码中文字幕乱伦| 中文字幕在线免费观看| 国产爆乳无码一区二区麻豆| 亚洲av无码乱码国产精品| 中文精品久久久久国产网址| 中文字幕色婷婷在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区| 97无码免费人妻超| 精品一区二区无码AV| 久久精品无码免费不卡| 无码AV大香线蕉| 中文在线资源天堂WWW| 亚洲天堂中文字幕|