Legal eagles must ready for extra-territorial rules in disputes

    Updated: 2013-06-05 07:41

    By Andrew Mak(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Given its renowned Court of Final Appeal incorporating expertise from other common law jurisdictions, Hong Kong has been fast developing into an international dispute resolution center. However, as an international dispute resolution center it must always be open to influence from and alert to foreign extra-territorial trends and changes. In the last few years, we had no shortage of litigations or arbitrations of an international dimension. The trend is growing fast. It may soon prove that at least part of the London litigation market and its expertise will gradually shift to Hong Kong. The Hong Kong legal professions should be ready to align themselves to this challenge and the opportunities associated with it. One such aspect is the recent development in the regulation of derivatives.

    Last week it was reported that the European regulators have clashed with the US over the timing of reforms to the $633 trillion derivatives market. EU regulators in a strongly worded letter urged further delays to guidelines that would extend the reach of US regulators overseas.

    There has always been a tension over the application of national laws overseas. The spectrum of regimes is rather complicated. It depends on whether or not we are talking about enforcement of court judgment, arbitral awards or regulatory disciplines.

    Enforcement of court judgments appears to be the most difficult one. First of all, there can be bilateral treaties for mutual enforcement of judgments. The format may be extended to multi-jurisdictions, such as mutual enforcement in the European Union. Secondly, in the common-law world a party sought to enforce a foreign judgment in his favor may sue on the judgment he had obtained, although there may be no direct enforcement. Penal laws such as tax law and criminal law are normally not enforceable. The civil-law system emphasizing sovereignty seems to be more difficult. No foreign judgment may be directly enforced unless there are treaties. It may be that criticisms against China in the enforcement of foreign laws will not be justified because you would not normally expect a US judgment to be directly enforced in France or Germany.

    Enforcement of arbitral awards seems to be much easier. So long as a state is a member of the New York Convention, it is enforceable in any party state. Notwithstanding this advantage, the types of disputes which may be arbitrable and thus enforced in a foreign state seem to focus on commercial disputes.

    Enforcement of regulatory disciplines is a matter between governments. In the financial and economic arena there seems to be a lot of cooperation in the form of international treaties across all economic disciplines: trade, investment and intellectual property. The process tends to be far more complicated.

    In the case of the derivatives market, we are constantly seeing the strain over how different countries should split the job of overseeing the global derivatives market. It is understandable that the US, after it suffered in its 2008 bailout of AIG after losses at its London derivatives arm, is now seeking wide authority to police foreign trading that puts its domestic taxpayers at risk. However, now at issue is the cross-border guideline of the US Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) which represents a hard line approach that has caused government concerns in the EU and Asia. The proposed CFTC cross-border guidance requires foreign banks trading with US companies to comply with US transaction rules. Overseas branches of US banks will be covered, as would US-based hedge funds incorporated abroad.

    Should Hong Kong follow those guidelines? The problem is obviously that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (regulating the banks) and the Securities and Futures Commission (regulating the rest of everything) will have to navigate overlapping but contradictory rules in the US and the European Union.

    How would Hong Kong's dispute-resolution system cope with such problems? There will soon be tabs on banks and hedge funds whose international swap trading could have a direct impact on the US economy. Hong Kong cannot escape the impact.

    At present the CFTC is trying to finalize the guidance before an exemption for foreign market participants expires on July 12, thus imposing the rules more widely. Perhaps this is not the first time that we have seen unilaterally imposing rules overseas that would have an impact on our economy.

    There is however the other side of the coin. In the US, as early as May 16 it was reported that US Federal regulators approved new rules but they also softened a crucial aspect of the plan in the face of lobbying pressure from the nation's biggest banks. It was said in the fine print, that the CFTC also effectively allowed a handful of select banks to continue controlling the $700 trillion derivatives market. It was said that just five banks hold more than 90 percent of all derivatives contracts, which allow companies to either speculate in the markets or protect against risk.

    While the European Union has warned that an approach in which jurisdictions require that their own domestic regulatory rules be applied to their companies' derivatives transactions taking place in broadly equivalent regulatory regimes abroad is not sustainable, and that the EU will certainly refuse to follow the US rules as presently drafted, it is doubtful whether Hong Kong's legal professions should now adopt a wait and see attitude. It may soon come that the existing rules of our regulatory regimes at the regulatory front, and our conflict of laws rules in private litigation or arbitrations will be tested soon again.

    The author is a Hong Kong barrister and chairman of the Hong Kong Bar's Special Committee on Planning and Policy.

    (HK Edition 06/05/2013 page1)

    国产羞羞的视频在线观看 国产一级无码视频在线 | 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看牲色| 线中文在线资源 官网| 国产精品午夜福利在线无码| 国产亚洲精久久久久久无码77777| 国产亚洲精品无码拍拍拍色欲| 在线a亚洲v天堂网2019无码| 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 97性无码区免费| 亚洲精品无码不卡在线播HE| 在线观看免费中文视频| 亚洲av麻豆aⅴ无码电影| 国产午夜无码精品免费看 | 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜不卡| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 成人无码午夜在线观看| 亚洲精品无码久久久影院相关影片| 六月婷婷中文字幕| 全球中文成人在线| 亚洲成?Ⅴ人在线观看无码| 国产成人午夜无码电影在线观看| 亚洲精品无码av人在线观看| 免费无码国产欧美久久18| 在线中文字幕av| 最近免费中文字幕大全免费| 日韩av无码中文无码电影| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码 | 91久久九九无码成人网站| 人妻系列无码专区无码中出| 亚洲av日韩av无码| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦下载| 成人午夜精品无码区久久| 国产亚洲大尺度无码无码专线| 国产品无码一区二区三区在线蜜桃 | 人妻丝袜中文无码av影音先锋专区| 亚洲永久无码3D动漫一区| 亚洲av无码一区二区乱子伦as| 在线精品无码字幕无码AV| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆穿越| 亚洲精品无码av人在线观看|