Questions hang over ExCo role

    Updated: 2013-06-14 07:34

    By Ho Chi-ping(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    It is no surprise to find that matters involving the role of the Executive Council (ExCo) and its membership are reaching boiling-point; the only surprise is that it has taken so long to bubble to the surface. Further, it is noteworthy that the subject has now embroiled no less a person than Legislative Council (LegCo) President Jasper Tsang Yok-sing, who was a member of our two preceding ExCos under inaugural Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa and his successor Donald Tsang Yam-kuen.

    Questions hang over ExCo role

    The LegCo chief recently put into words what many in society were thinking when he said, "during British rule the ExCo was a body with actual power. (Its members) had a strong say in front of the governor; their words carried a lot of weight. There was a rule that if the governor reached a decision contrary to the majority view in ExCo, he needed to give specific reasons on record, which would be seen by the British Government. Today, we can't see the ExCo performing the same function."

    This came on top of the resignation of CE Leung Chun-ying's top aide, Barry Cheung Chun-yuen, following the collapse on May 18 of the Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange which Cheung had founded. An earlier jolt that shook the ranks of ExCo's membership to the core was the case of Franklin Lam Fan-keung, who went on "indefinite leave" after graftbusters began investigating allegations that he used inside information when deciding to sell two Mid-Levels flats.

    Meanwhile, veteran politician and Liberal Party founding member Allen Lee Peng-fei (who served on ExCo 1986-92) has claimed that under CY Leung's tenure ExCo has deteriorated into a platform for granting favors to his allies, since he appears to care little about the capabilities of those he has appointed.

    I take no pleasure in pointing out that my misgivings about ExCo have long been on record. In April 2007, as the former secretary for home affairs, I was one of a handful of people who questioned the role ExCo was performing in post-handover Hong Kong. My "reward" was something of a barrage of criticism from various quarters.

    My intention was to point out that ExCo should align with the changes of the time, and so should aim for greater effectiveness in administration. In particular I was concerned about the creation of a harmonious society plus other possible changes concerning such subjects as religious standards and cultural affairs. However, I never said that ExCo should be replaced or canceled, nor did I say it was unnecessary.

    Questions hang over ExCo role

    I had long believed the government needed to better align with public opinion, and that Hong Kong needed better administration, so that where necessary the system should be revised and improved. That is the message I was trying to convey. The main argument against retaining ExCo's previous functions was that its president, the CE, would no longer be a British governor who neither spoke Cantonese nor read Chinese. Instead, after the handover, our CE would be a chosen local person with his finger on the pulse of developments both here and on the mainland, a Chinese notable who could read the local newspapers, follow the news on radio and TV in the local lingo and understand all its political nuances, and have a complete grasp of our affairs and Hong Kong people's thinking. In other words, our CE would be a person of completely different qualities and values from a Briton transferred by London.

    In colonial times a range of serious responsibilities affecting Hong Kong's future fell on the shoulders of executive councillors. All distinguished members of either the Chinese or expatriate communities, these members passed on their wisdom to one governor after another, but it can be assumed that their advice differed on many subjects. The role of the Chinese representatives was to gather public opinion to fulfill these two responsibilities: first, to ensure that policies also benefit the Chinese; and second, to ensure a balanced distribution of benefits.

    Today ExCo's membership has expanded to 15 ex-officio members and (with Cheung's resignation) 14 non-officials. The bottom line is that the Basic Law states there must be an ExCo, but not that it should in some ways duplicate its former role in colonial times. Whether ExCo aligns with the present situation is what he has to consider. For that matter, society itself hasn't reached a consensus over the issue. Several years have passed since I last commented on the issue publicly. But perhaps it still isn't too late to introduce some adjustments.

    The author is vice-chairman and secretary-general of the China Energy Fund Committee, an independent think tank on China and energy-related issues.

    (HK Edition 06/14/2013 page9)

    丰满人妻AV无码一区二区三区| 久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码麻豆| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码免下载| 中文有无人妻vs无码人妻激烈 | 无码AV中文字幕久久专区| 天堂8а√中文在线官网| 中文字幕精品一区二区日本| 免费A级毛片无码无遮挡内射| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区 | 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 亚洲国产综合精品中文第一区| 亚洲Av无码专区国产乱码DVD| av无码专区| 久久无码AV中文出轨人妻| 亚洲中文字幕无码永久在线| 亚洲Aⅴ无码专区在线观看q| 影音先锋中文无码一区| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久| 亚洲精品无码专区久久同性男| 五月婷婷在线中文字幕观看 | 色综合AV综合无码综合网站| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 精品无码一区二区三区电影| 日韩人妻无码精品无码中文字幕| 最新无码A∨在线观看| 无码毛片一区二区三区中文字幕 | 99久久国产热无码精品免费久久久久 | 免费无码国产欧美久久18| 国产精品中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 中文最新版地址在线| 国产 日韩 中文字幕 制服| 亚洲男人第一无码aⅴ网站| 亚洲综合最新无码专区| 亚洲人成影院在线无码观看| 午夜精品久久久久久久无码| 亚洲 欧美 国产 日韩 中文字幕| AV色欲无码人妻中文字幕| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕蜜桃| 日本乱中文字幕系列| 中文无码一区二区不卡αv|