Is HK to become 'Asia's Naples'?

    Updated: 2013-07-11 06:05

    By Ho Chi-ping(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Just a few weeks ago, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing announced a blueprint that envisions the setting up of much overdue waste-to-energy facilities to supplement the landfill method of dumping, which we employ to dispose of about half of our refuse. Since waste disposal has long been a hot topic in Hong Kong, we were heartened when he pointed out that the use of new technology would enable waste-to-energy plants to provide clean operations while transforming waste into a usable resource. That's good news, we thought - at last Hong Kong is going to catch up with the rest of Asia by incinerating refuse and extracting power from the heat this process generates. But his announcement added this cautionary note: We are now at a stage to engage the public to talk about the details of implementation, including the level of charge. Isn't it time we "walked the walk", not "talked the talk"?

    Is HK to become 'Asia's Naples'?

    Indeed, there has been a lot of talk lately about our waste crisis - very angry talk in the Legislative Council. Because the government wants to expand two of our three remaining landfills so that still more rubbish can be dumped into them, and rebellious councillors didn't want to authorize the required funds. And just look at the amounts involved - no less than a hair-raising HK$7 billion to expand the Ta Kwu Ling landfill, plus HK$35 million for a "study" on ways to enlarge the Tuen Mun landfill.

    About the only plus factor concerning our landfills is that 13 of them were closed between 1996 and 2006, with most of them converted into ecological parks, multi-purpose grass pitches, rest centers and golf courses. The former Ma Tso Lung landfill in North District is now a recreation center for the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals while the former Tsang Kwan Ho eyesore in Sai Kung, closed in 1999, is to become a football academy and driving range.

    Returning to the concept of incinerating our rubbish and deriving energy from the heat, why didn't we try this solution many years ago? Let's turn back the clock by 21 years and see what our humble little neighbor Macao did then about its ever-growing problem of refuse disposal. In 1992, it set up the Macao Incineration Plant that used three incinerators to dispose of domestic and medical waste, transformed the heat into power and fed that power into the electricity grid. Then in 2006, when the throughput at the plant was nudging 300,000 tons a year, Macao very sensibly put in three more incinerators to double the plant's capacity to 1,800 tons a day, or 657,000 tons a year.

    Highly conscious of the dangers of pollution in the city's overcrowded environment, Macao also went to great pains to ensure that the plant would operate in accord with European Union emission standards, and so it is safely sited on Taipa Island, though still less than a kilometer from multi-story blocks of flats.

    Is HK to become 'Asia's Naples'?

    Similar plants that incinerate household refuse and turn the resultant heat into energy have been operating for decades in progressive cities around Asia. They can be found in several of the biggest cities in Japan plus Seoul and Singapore. Furthermore, in Japan, operations are so environmentally clean that municipal authorities build civic centers next to the plants complete with libraries, meeting halls and even swimming pools that are heated in winter - all thanks to the adjoining incinerators.

    And yet Hong Kong, which prides itself on its get-up-and-go approach to every problem, is only just now (to re-quote the environment secretary) "at a stage to engage the public to talk about the details of implementation."

    Since the government has for so long "fiddled" while nothing has burned, should it admit defeat and consider turning the problem over to the private sector before Hong Kong becomes the "Naples" of Asia? In 2007, the landfills of Naples were so badly overflowing with garbage and other rotting refuse that municipal workers would not pick up any more rubbish from the streets to add to the filthy mess. The result: Piles of rubbish all across Naples completely blocking some footpaths. Today, Naples is no longer one of Italy's favorite tourist destinations. The few unsuspecting visitors who arrive are soon clasping their noses and hurrying back to the railway station to get away from the stench.

    Meanwhile, not everybody in Hong Kong moves at a snail's pace when it comes to deriving energy from trash. Its' noteworthy that a consortium headed by Li Ka-shing recently offered $1.26 billion for the Dutch waste treatment company AVR, The Netherlands' biggest "waste to energy" company that - yes, you guessed it - recycles refuse to generate power. Also, in January, Li's Cheung Kong investment group stumped up $501 million for New Zealand's EnviroWaste operation, which also produces energy from junk besides managing landfills.

    Isn't there a "hot tip" in all this for Hong Kong?

    The author is vice-chairman and secretary-general of China Energy Fund Committee.

    (HK Edition 07/11/2013 page9)

    色综合久久最新中文字幕| 精品无码日韩一区二区三区不卡 | 在线精品自拍无码| 无码乱码av天堂一区二区| 综合无码一区二区三区| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 日日摸夜夜爽无码毛片精选| 暖暖日本中文视频| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲av福利无码无一区二区 | 在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 99久久无色码中文字幕人妻| 国产午夜无码精品免费看动漫| 中文字幕久久精品无码| 亚洲不卡无码av中文字幕| 制服丝袜人妻中文字幕在线| 免费a级毛片无码| 国产成人无码久久久精品一| 无码中文av有码中文a| 中文字幕乱偷无码AV先锋| 暖暖免费中文在线日本| 欧美人妻aⅴ中文字幕| 无码中文人妻在线一区二区三区 | 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区三区| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费视频| 国产精品无码无卡无需播放器| 人妻丰满av无码中文字幕| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区免费 | 在线精品无码字幕无码AV| 久久五月精品中文字幕| 日本免费中文字幕| 亚洲日本欧美日韩中文字幕| 暖暖免费在线中文日本| 中文字幕一区在线观看视频| 国产精品综合专区中文字幕免费播放| 亚洲色成人中文字幕网站| 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影 | 日韩高清在线中文字带字幕 | 日韩精品久久无码中文字幕 | 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕| www.中文字幕|