Political rows part of the process of social development

    Updated: 2013-07-20 07:11

    By Ho Hon-Kuen(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Last Saturday, I had the chance to attend a talk by Wang Fengchao on the subject "A Brief History of Hong Kong" at the Culture Institute of the Beijing Institute of Socialism and benefited extensively from the more than three-hour discussion. Those aware of Hong Kong's modern history, particularly issues concerning the central government's negotiations on the handover of Hong Kong, will know of Wang's substantive participation.

    Wang was brief on Hong Kong's ancient history and focused more on modern topics. "According to statistics, among the 193 member countries of the United Nations today, merely 22 countries had escaped from the British Royal Navy in opening their doors." Wang's short introductory remark directly led the writer to ponder, how powerful was the British Empire, "on which the sun never sets", in the oceans of the 18th and 19th centuries. China, a vast land with long stretches of coast, was inevitably a clear object of interest which the British Empire "fancied" at that time. Moreover, since China was then ruled by the corrupt Qing Dynasty (1644-1911), how could China be autonomous and make decisions for itself?

    "The changes in the economy caused three evolutions in Hong Kong's Legislative Council (LegCo): the introduction of the unofficial members of LegCo in 1850; the introduction of Chinese members in 1880; and the diverse and balanced composition of LegCo until the 1970s." Wang pointed out that the council's "release of power" over the century largely corresponds to the Western saying: the obligations and rights of taxpayers should reach a reasonable balance. Indeed, at that time, the Chinese already dominated Hong Kong in terms of economic productivity and capital investment. This in turn, reminds me of Hong Kong today. In the existing LegCo, how much economic power do the 28 functional constituencies collectively possess? How much do they contribute to the city's GDP? Based on the principle of "One Country, Two Systems", Hong Kong practices capitalism. So how should Hong Kong safeguard the future business interests of large and small enterprises? One cannot blindly obliterate their existence; this is a matter for serious consideration.

    Sir Murray MacLehose, as a diplomat, became the Hong Kong governor in 1971. Apparently, before he assumed the role, he submitted a report to the British Foreign Office, stating the need to propose a negotiation timetable with China on Hong Kong's future. On March 29, 1979, MacLehose travelled to Beijing and negotiated with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in person, raising three questions: Are the three treaties (The 1842 Sino-British Treaty of Nanking; the 1860 Sino-British Convention of Peking and the 1898 Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory) valid? Is it feasible for the British to exchange sovereignty in return for the right to rule? Or is it possible to renew the rent of Hong Kong?

    After MacLehose was notified of the "disappointing" results, which was "no" to all three questions, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher finally concluded negotiations with Deng Xiaoping in 1983. The clear answer was: China will resume sovereignty over Hong Kong with effect from July 1, 1997. Both parties signed the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 1984, agreeing that three areas would remain unchanged: the political, legal and capitalist systems.

    After the governorship of MacLehose, Sir David Wilson and Chris Patten were consecutively appointed governor. The British administration introduced significant political changes during this period, particularly when Patten was in office, who introduced directly elected seats to the LegCo. This almost betrayed the promise of "no changes" declared in the Joint Declaration. "The Chinese government was not even informed of the plans to build a new airport, the Chinese government and the British had numerous disputes day after day, time after time on the issue of the handover," Wang said. He concluded that today's conflicts in Hong Kong, in comparison, are no big deal. Hong Kong people should face them optimistically, as these worries are part of the process of growing up.

    History progresses quickly. It has been 16 years since the handover, yet arguments still constantly take place in Hong Kong. The war of words between Chinese officials and British diplomats has been replaced by rising tensions between the opposing camps of "Occupy Central" and "Anti-Occupy Central" supporters, sparking off fears of extreme division in Hong Kong society. The writer hopes Wang was right in suggesting these worries are mere by-products of Hong Kong's social development, and that sunshine always follows the rain.

    The author is vice-chairman of Education Convergence.

    (HK Edition 07/20/2013 page6)

    爆操夜夜操天天操狠操中文| 高清无码视频直接看| 久久青青草原亚洲av无码app | 无码日韩人妻精品久久蜜桃| 亚洲电影中文字幕| 一本色道无码道在线| 精品亚洲A∨无码一区二区三区| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文| 国产精品一级毛片无码视频| 无码专区狠狠躁躁天天躁| 中文字幕av日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线咪咕| 911国产免费无码专区| 无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区浪潮| 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕 | 中文亚洲AV片在线观看不卡 | 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 久久无码国产| 国产成人A亚洲精V品无码| 亚洲中文久久精品无码| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区 | 男人的天堂无码动漫AV| 亚洲av永久无码精品国产精品 | 熟妇无码乱子成人精品| 亚洲动漫精品无码av天堂| 伊人久久无码精品中文字幕| 日本一区二区三区不卡视频中文字幕| 色婷婷综合久久久中文字幕| A狠狠久久蜜臀婷色中文网| а√天堂中文官网8| 大蕉久久伊人中文字幕| 91中文在线观看| 中文字幕无码高清晰| 亚洲综合日韩中文字幕v在线| 日本久久久久久中文字幕| 国产高清中文手机在线观看| 中文字幕日韩精品有码视频| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费| 亚洲精品午夜无码专区|