The burning question to landfill capacity lies with incineration

    Updated: 2013-08-01 06:37

    By Raymond So(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    A garbage crisis is looming in Hong Kong after the government failed to get the Legislative Council's (LegCo) nod on fund allocation for the study of the extension of existing landfills.

    When the government withdrew its request for funds to study the extension of Tseung Kwan O landfill from LegCo, many commentators predicted the government would not be able to get LegCo endorsement for similar requests to study the extension of other landfills as well. This prophecy doesn't require a crystal ball. It is clear that landfills are not welcome by nearby residents, and the opposition voice is strong. The defeat somehow indicates that the government has too few allies in LegCo on this matter. Worse still, the garbage problem has become a political issue. With pressure from voters, it is not easy to get endorsements from lawmakers.

    The struggle reflects the overriding reality that the traditional way of relying on landfills to dispose of garbage is no longer workable. What the city needs now for tackling the pressing garbage problem is a four-dimensional approach, which should consist of landfills, a garbage levy to reduce waste, incineration plants, and reclamation.

    The burning question to landfill capacity lies with incineration

    The city used to rely on landfills for garbage disposal in the past mainly because people did not have the mindset or channels to raise objections, and to protect their rights. In the colonial years, LegCo was dominated by pro-government members. The government could easily pass resolutions on the opening of new areas for landfills. There were cases in which the landfills were located in the urban area, such as the Jordan Valley landfill and the Sai Tso Wan landfill, which were located in East Kowloon. People living nearby suffered from poor air quality and other severe pollution problems until the two landfills were closed and have become parks after years of restoration. The clear lesson is, though landfills can be restored to become leisure areas, the process is time-consuming and costly. Having become a landfill, the land cannot be used for residential purposes because of the existence of biogas, which takes many years to diminish before development can be carried out. Very often, the restored land on landfill can only be used to build parks and playgrounds. Hence, while landfill is an essential element in garbage handling, this approach is likely to expire soon because new landfills can hardly be built.

    The idea of garbage levy and waste reduction is appealing. According to many environmental concern groups, if the garbage production rate is reduced, there is no need for landfill extensions. The problem is, even with effective waste reduction, garbage will not totally disappear. Sooner or later the existing landfills will all hit capacity unless we can reduce waste by a drastic margin. However, a large reduction in waste calls for a heavy levy on garbage disposal, raising the problem of persuading people to accept the levy. Taiwan's experience shows that incinerators are still necessary even though they have significantly reduced garbage with a levy.

    Incineration plants are clearly not welcome by many people for fear of poisonous gas and materials. Nevertheless, when we look at the garbage problem, we have no way out but to incinerate. Modern technologies have greatly reduced the production of poisonous materials, and shrink garbage to around one percent of the original volume, minimizing or eliminating the need to extend existing landfills. Incineration plants can help resolve major disputes surrounding the garbage problem; no wonder the government is pushing hard for this choice.

    Residuals produced by incineration can be used for reclamation, which the government has planned to accomplish outside Victoria Harbor to further build up its land bank. Singapore has successfully reclaimed land with incineration residuals.

    This is how the four-dimensional approach in garbage-handling works. First we install a garbage levy so as to reduce garbage growth. Then we reduce the volume of garbage through incineration, and dump the residuals on reclamation site or in landfills. As garbage is greatly reduced and the residuals are not as undesirable as normal garbage, the landfill problem can be alleviated as well.

    The author is dean of the School of Business at Hang Seng Management College.

    (HK Edition 08/01/2013 page9)

    亚洲精品无码久久久久久| 日韩精品无码熟人妻视频| 国产成人无码18禁午夜福利p| 最近中文字幕国语免费完整| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无码AV | 国产爆乳无码一区二区麻豆| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久久不卡| 亚洲AV永久无码天堂影院 | 久久亚洲AV成人无码电影| 人妻丰满熟妇aⅴ无码| 日本中文字幕电影| 精品久久久中文字幕人妻| 国产亚洲?V无码?V男人的天堂 | 久久精品无码免费不卡| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 中文无码伦av中文字幕| 中文字幕在线看日本大片| 日本高清不卡中文字幕免费| 久久久久久综合一区中文字幕| 日本中文字幕一区二区有码在线| 久久综合一区二区无码| 国产精品无码一区二区在线观一 | 亚洲无码视频在线| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区| 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码不卡 | 亚洲av无码成人黄网站在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃 | 天堂新版8中文在线8| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区| 中文字幕人成高清视频| 中文字幕丰满伦子无码| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品有坂深雪| 天堂а√在线中文在线最新版 | 中文字幕av在线| a亚洲欧美中文日韩在线v日本| 佐佐木明希一区二区中文字幕| 久久精品99无色码中文字幕| 中文字幕无码播放免费| 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱孑伦AS | 久久久久久国产精品无码超碰 | 中文字幕在线无码一区二区三区|