Disobedience is the first sin

    Updated: 2013-08-06 07:06

    By Lau Nai-keung(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Disobedience is the first sin

    Remember, eating an apple is a sin; breaking Hong Kong's law may not be a sin. Keep this in mind, and bear with me on more bunkum that follows.

    The Catholic diocese published a statement titled "An urgent call for earnest dialogue and responsible action" on the front page of its weekly Kung Kao Po and Sunday Examiner newspapers respectively on July 23, commenting officially and directly for the first time on the pending "summer camp" next year.

    While the title looks rather innocent and unattractive, the subtitle is much juicier. It reads: "Regarding universal suffrage and civil disobedience". Putting them side by side, one may be tempted to entertain the thought, naively, that the diocese is asking the "Occupy Central" practitioners to be responsible. In fact, the opposite is true. The sole purpose of the statement is to give the campaign a green light, so that Catholics in Hong Kong know that they can still enter heaven after participating in this action.

    "It appears that the 'Occupy' movement currently being organized by some local people, as a form of civil disobedience, has come about precisely as a consequence of the above and other related concerns which must be seriously and responsibly addressed by the authorities and by all who have a stake in the future of Hong Kong," the statement reads. Not exactly a "think twice" kind of cautionary note, is it?

    Disobedience is the first sin

    Vicar Michael Yeung Ming-cheung was even more explicit. Expanding on the meaning of the statement, he said: "I believe it is not a sin to join the 'Occupy' campaign. It is only an expression, though law-breaking, for civil rights. If any people, from ordinary Catholics to priests, are prosecuted for joining the campaign, the church is obliged to offer support."

    Yeung's mention of sin is mind-boggling. It is common sense that the Catholic conception of sin has little to do with crime as we know it, and therefore it is not clear why "not a sin" can be used as an excuse for the church's intervention on secular affairs. Here is a definition according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church: "Sin is an offense against God: 'Against you, you alone, have I sinned, and done that which is evil in your sight.' Sin sets itself against God's love for us and turns our hearts away from it. Like the first sin, it is disobedience, a revolt against God through the will to become 'like gods', knowing and determining good and evil. Sin is thus 'love of oneself even to contempt of God'. In this proud self-exaltation, sin is diametrically opposed to the obedience of Jesus, which achieves our salvation."

    Disobedience is repeatedly mentioned in the Bible as the cause of sin: "Sin entered the world through the first man and spread to all his offspring - this happened by Adam sinning. Death is a result of sin, it was the result of sin. Both were a result from his disobedience in eating the fruit of the tree." (Acts 17:26)

    The Catholic conception of sin can get very technical, but sins and worldly crimes only overlap to a limited extent. The Church maintains that seven vices in particular lead to breaking one or more of the Ten Commandments. These particular bad habits are called the seven deadly sins because, according to Catholicism, they're mortal sins - sins that kill the life of "sanctifying grace". If you have watched the movie you know they are pride, envy, lust, anger, gluttony, greed and sloth. If the meaning of these words in Catholic-ese resembles English even remotely, we are all sinners, including the majority of the Catholics.

    On the other hand, peeing in public may not be a sin, but it is against the law. When it is also an act of conscience directed at preventing or removing grave injustice and/or violation of fundamental rights (such as the right to relieve oneself), would the church also give the man a hand and sanctify his act of "civil disobedience"?

    The bottom-line is: Adam's disobedience was also non-violent. His act was anti-authority. His right to eating an apple would have been protected by what is known later as the right to food - the "fundamental human right" derived from the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. To be consistent, why don't the Catholic Church clear Adam's name first?

    The author is a member of the Commission on Strategic Development.

    (HK Edition 08/06/2013 page1)

    日韩中文字幕在线视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪| 亚洲高清中文字幕免费| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区在线观看| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 国产成人精品无码播放| 97无码人妻福利免费公开在线视频 | 亚洲VA中文字幕不卡无码| 日本中文字幕免费看| 亚洲精品一级无码鲁丝片| 免费A级毛片av无码| 国产综合无码一区二区辣椒 | 中文字幕国产| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚| 国产成人无码av片在线观看不卡| 一本色道久久HEZYO无码| 再看日本中文字幕在线观看 | 无码爆乳护士让我爽| 色综合久久无码中文字幕| 中文字幕国产精品| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 日木av无码专区亚洲av毛片| 中文字字幕在线中文无码| 久久精品无码一区二区WWW| 中文成人久久久久影院免费观看| 无码AV中文字幕久久专区| 日本按摩高潮a级中文片| 日韩亚洲欧美中文在线| 亚洲中文字幕在线乱码| 中文字幕亚洲男人的天堂网络| 午夜无码视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲人成无码网站久久99热国产| 国产精品亚洲аv无码播放| 精品无码日韩一区二区三区不卡| 人禽无码视频在线观看| 国模GOGO无码人体啪啪| 国产亚洲精品无码成人| 国产精品无码久久综合网| 无码日韩人妻AV一区免费l| 无码少妇一区二区浪潮av| 中文字幕免费不卡二区|