Mockery within the law

    Updated: 2013-08-22 06:45

    By Qiu You(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Enough is enough about the public bickering over teacher Lam Wai-sze's controversial verbal abuse of police and the subsequent political standoff. This storm in a teacup has gone too far in whipping up much ado about nothing. For netizens, activists, artists or cartoonists alike, who enjoy making fun of the city's political scene and figures in the form of parody or satire, they are now faced with a more serious and legitimate concern - a proposed copyright law amendment that regulates parodies.

    The proposed bill, dubbed by some as the "Article 23 of the Internet", which originally suggested imposing criminal sanctions on parodies, was supposed to be put to final vote at the Legislative Council (LegCo) last summer. Due to public fears it would gag freedom of expression and creativity, as well as all the hindrances by filibusters at that time, the bill was finally shelved for wider consultation later.

    Now the controversial issue is back on the agenda and a public consultation has been launched until mid-November as to whether or not parodies should be exempt from legal liability. It is good to see government finally addressing the concerns of parodists and initiate a more lenient and liberal approach in dealing with parody.

    Under the watered-down proposal, three options exist. The first is to clarify existing provisions for copyright infringement by saying that only works causing "more than trivial economic prejudice" to the copyright owner would be subject to criminal sanctions. The second option is to introduce a specific criminal exemption for parody so long as the work meets the qualifying conditions, including "not causing more than trivial economic prejudice to the copyright owner". In other words, under these two options, parodists would not be incriminated if their works are not for sale or have not caused considerable economic damage to copyright owners.

    Mockery within the law

    The final one is to exempt parodists from civil and criminal liabilities as long as they meet "fair dealing" requirements to be decided by a court on a case-by-case basis. The factors to be considered include the purpose and nature of the work, the degree of similarity with the original work and the impact on the original work's potential market. The existing fair dealing provisions for copyright works - works for the purposes of education, research and private study, criticism and review, as well as news reporting that fall under the exemption - can be applied to the third approach.

    The fundamental question is whether there is a need to criminalize parodies when they exceed the copyright limit. With technological advancement, it has become common and popular for netizens, critics, and artists to exchange their views and comments on current events by altering existing copyright works and disseminating them on the Internet. It is undeniable that satire and pastiche have grown into an integral part of our culture, especially online. Not only do they help to cultivate creativity and artistic culture, and add to the city's economic vibrancy and diversity, but they also encourage healthy and liberal public debates on current affairs, prompting the government to be receptive to public opinion.

    While netizens or parodists may have fun lampooning the political scene or public figures, the spoofed or the parodied would not be amused. It is important to protect the city's freedom of expression as well as artists' freedom of creation. But it is equally important to safeguard copyright protection and enhance intellectual property development in the city. Some US copyright owners associations recently suggested to the US Trade Representative that Hong Kong should be put under a watch list for allegedly lagging in copyright protection on the Internet. It is therefore essential to strike a balance between freedom of expression and copyright protection.

    For parodists, the second and third options are more preferable as they guarantee a copyright exception for parodies that meet certain conditions. However, for the second one, the definition of "more than trivial economic prejudice" is problematic. How to measure economic damage and what amounts to "more than trivial"? Some parodists like to upload their works to YouTube, where they may earn their commissions if a certain hit rate is met. Will this move cause "more than trivial" economic damage to the copyright owner? It will be better if policymakers clarify this meaning and make clear other qualifying conditions.

    As to the third option, Hong Kong can draw on the experience of some countries such as Australia and Canada, which have provided a copyright exception for parody and satire within the ambit of "fair dealing". However, their statutes have neither specified how fairness should be assessed nor decided any case for reference. Moreover, there are many decided cases in the US on what is "fair use" of a copyright work despite a case-by-case approach taken by the US court. However, without clear definition on what constitutes "fair dealing", it raises the concern of triggering self-censorship among derivative-works artists in order not to be sued. Some have suggested creating a defense of public interest. The government needs to address their concerns and be open-minded to different opinions that help to perfect this regulatory regime.

    The author is a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 08/22/2013 page9)

    综合国产在线观看无码| 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕系| 日本公妇在线观看中文版| 少妇无码太爽了在线播放| 中文字字幕在线中文乱码不卡| 无码国内精品久久人妻蜜桃| av中文字幕在线| 少妇极品熟妇人妻无码| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影| 亚洲精品无码不卡| 亚洲国产精品无码久久SM| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品一区| 亚洲日韩中文无码久久| 国产精品无码久久综合网| 午夜亚洲AV日韩AV无码大全| 一夲道DVD高清无码| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品一区| 中文字幕亚洲综合精品一区| 亚洲中文字幕无码中文字在线| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 免费无码婬片aaa直播表情| 国产午夜片无码区在线播放| 无码人妻少妇色欲AV一区二区| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 中文无码不卡的岛国片| 久久无码高潮喷水| 高清无码中文字幕在线观看视频| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲| 日韩视频中文字幕精品偷拍| 最近完整中文字幕2019电影 | 无码人妻一区二区三区免费n鬼沢| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区蜜桃| 日本一区二区三区中文字幕| 日韩免费在线中文字幕| 中文字幕乱码免费看电影| 在线天堂资源www在线中文| 最新国产AV无码专区亚洲| 无码专区AAAAAA免费视频|