In the press

    Updated: 2013-09-06 06:51

    By Wong Chi-wah(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Ill-conceived 'goalie theory'

    Public debates over how universal suffrage should be implemented in the 2017 Chief Executive (CE) Election have been focused on a controversial proposal known as the "goalie theory" lately, which is designed to ensure that opposition politicians are in the running for CE election candidacy by ignoring the central authorities' right to set the rules and oversee Hong Kong's constitutional development as well as relevant provisions in the Basic Law.

    The "goalie theory" has the central government acting as the goalie in soccer games and exercising the final veto power to shut anyone it deems unfit for CE election candidacy out of the nominations. That will eliminate the possibility of an opponent of the central government taking the position of CE. Too bad this plan was born with several fatal flaws:

    First, it completely ignores the fact that Hong Kong is a special administrative region of China directly under the jurisdiction of the central government. By stripping the central government of its power to adjudicate over Hong Kong's CE election and reducing it to a mere goalie, the opposition will be able to have its own candidate in the CE race and may even win it.

    Second, it will take the Basic Law, which sets the principles and rules for the implementation of universal suffrage in Hong Kong, out of the picture, so that the opposition can put its own candidate (s) in the CE election despite the central government's objection, because they won't have to satisfy the prerequisite of being patriotic. That also means the nomination process will become a formality and the central government may not be able to prevent an opposition politician from winning the CE election because, third, the "goalie" format will allow the opposition camp to turn Hong Kong's CE election into an open-to-all circus where the audience can affect the performers with cheers or jeers and determine their popularity. The central government, meanwhile, may have to yield to "international pressure" and let the opposition "score" or fend for itself against attacks by furious foreign "fans" of the opposition side.

    The author is a current affairs commentator. This is an excerpted translation of his article published in Hong Kong Commercial Daily on Sept 5.

    In the press

    (HK Edition 09/06/2013 page9)

    最近中文字幕2019高清免费| 国产丝袜无码一区二区三区视频 | 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看| 中文字幕乱码久久午夜| 69ZXX少妇内射无码| 亚洲精品无码不卡在线播放HE| a中文字幕1区| a级毛片无码兔费真人久久| 亚洲精品无码鲁网中文电影| 最近中文字幕完整版资源| 亚洲毛片av日韩av无码| 日韩精品无码专区免费播放| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口 | 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线播放| 久久久这里有精品中文字幕| 久别的草原在线影院电影观看中文| 国产精品无码一区二区三区电影| 亚洲人成无码网站| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 中文精品人人永久免费| 在线中文字幕播放| 无码中文人妻视频2019| 亚洲成?v人片天堂网无码| 国产精品一级毛片无码视频 | 精品人妻va出轨中文字幕| 影院无码人妻精品一区二区| 精品无码人妻久久久久久| www无码乱伦| 精品无码三级在线观看视频| 精品亚洲成α人无码成α在线观看| 国产精品无码久久综合网| 99久久人妻无码精品系列 | 伊人久久大香线蕉无码麻豆| 一本大道无码日韩精品影视| 亚洲熟妇少妇任你躁在线观看无码| 国产精品成人无码久久久久久| 97性无码区免费| 亚洲精品无码久久久| 超清无码无卡中文字幕| 最近2019年免费中文字幕高清|