Junketeers damage city's reputation

    Updated: 2013-09-10 07:12

    By Lau Nai-keung(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    The Bo Xilai trial tells us two things. First, the nation's new leadership is dead serious about curbing corruption. Contrary to expectations from some corners, the anti-corruption campaign is going to be here to stay. In fact, it is now transforming from a campaign into something more regular and institutional. Skeptics need look no further than the lukewarm luxury goods sales data for proof.

    Another point worth noting is the difficulty of establishing a corruption case. It is not uncommon on the mainland for children and spouses to receive bribes which the officeholder in question may or may not be aware of. Legal ownership (or even equitable ownership) of assets is often ambiguous and uncertain; the provision of benefits in exchange is often unnoticeable. All these add to the challenge of fighting corruption.

    We in Hong Kong are luckier. Our institutions and legal system make it easier for us to detect and prevent graft. We should be putting these to good use, but unfortunately we aren't.

    Recently, the Berlin-based Transparency International ranked Hong Kong 14th globally in its Corruption Perceptions Index, down two places from 12th in its previous report. This is the city's lowest ranking on the index since 2007, and although according to the report Hong Kong is still the second-least corrupt area in Asia after Singapore, it is a warning sign.

    Responding to the report, an Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) spokesperson said some prominent corruption cases widely reported in the media might have affected people's perception of Hong Kong. "From another perspective, that the ICAC busted these cases shows we will not tolerate graft and are determined and efficient in fighting corruption," he claimed.

    Indeed that might be the case. Among the city's most prominent anti-graft cases last year was the investigation into the Kwok brothers - Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong and Raymond Kwok Ping-luen, and unfortunately former chief secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan was also implicated together with the two property tycoons. The case led us to wonder how widespread and how bad the collusion between certain high-ranking government officials and the property business is, but until today exposure of the relevant facts has been limited. (In theory a case should not be discussed while it is still ongoing, but in practice only the very rich enjoy these privileges. On the other hand, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's allies were given a great deal of exposure when they were in trouble.)

    Junketeers damage city's reputation

    Cases busted will not do long-lasting damage to our image as a graft-free city. In the long run it has the effect of deterring other cases from happening. What really hurt us, both in perception and in reality, are the cases that are not busted, such as the recent Cathay-gate.

    In the Cathay-gate case, people who went on a junket were exposed, but mysteriously no one was investigated. They were grilled by the press for a day or two, and then everything returned to business as usual.

    Hong Kong's Prevention of Bribery Ordinance sets a very straight standard for public servants, which is defined as "any prescribed officer and also any employee of a public body and in the case of a public body any member of the public body." The Legislative Council (LegCo) is a public body, according to the Ordinance, and therefore councillors are public servants.

    Section Four of the Ordinance specifies, "any public servant who solicits or accepts any advantage as an inducement to or reward for performing duties shall be guilty of an offense." Similarly, Section Five of the Ordinance says, "any public servant who solicits or accepts any advantage as an inducement to or reward for giving assistance or using influence in matters relating to a contract shall be guilty of an offense."

    The French trip was obviously an inducement for the junketeers to support a third runway, which fell under the mercy of LegCo. The "advantage" and the "inducement" are clear beyond reasonable doubt. Among them, Albert Ho Chun-yan is on the board of the Airport Authority and he has an added conflict of interest.

    The fact that the junketeers came from both political camps does not mean that they are not guilty of the offense. In reality, similar forms of graft are prevalent in the city. Let's dig all of them out, and not be complacent about ourselves. In the end, we may find to our surprise, that we are not that much cleaner than the mainland.

    The author is a member of the Commission on Strategic Development.

    (HK Edition 09/10/2013 page1)

    无码人妻一区二区三区兔费| 中文字幕无码久久人妻| 亚洲一区二区三区无码影院| 无码精品A∨在线观看十八禁| 亚洲午夜无码AV毛片久久| 无码午夜成人1000部免费视频| 最近中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产V亚洲V天堂A无码| 亚洲AV永久无码精品网站在线观看| 一本久中文视频播放| 亚洲av无码天堂一区二区三区| 久久精品中文字幕无码绿巨人| 中文字幕日韩精品无码内射 | 色情无码WWW视频无码区小黄鸭| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码| 中文一国产一无码一日韩| 99久久精品无码一区二区毛片| 亚洲日产无码中文字幕| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线观看| 无码精品日韩中文字幕| 综合无码一区二区三区| 97无码免费人妻超| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲午夜福利AV一区二区无码| 四虎影视无码永久免费| 在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 亚洲啪啪AV无码片| 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区 | 亚洲欧洲中文日韩久久AV乱码| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文| 欧美日韩中文国产一区发布 | 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕 | 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜精品久久久久久久无码| 免费A级毛片无码鲁大师| 亚洲AV无码之日韩精品| 亚洲一本大道无码av天堂| 中文字幕无码免费久久| 久久精品中文字幕久久| 亚洲乱码中文字幕手机在线| 伊人久久无码精品中文字幕|