Seatbelts for third runway landing

    Updated: 2013-09-13 07:15

    By Albert Lin(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    The main trouble with our legislators' freebie to France with Cathay Pacific is that somebody opened their big mouth about it. And now we know who, where, what, when and how - the only part of the jigsaw with the slightest tinge of doubt about it is why. Frankly, Cathay's supposed reason - to "introduce" them to the Airbus 330 and visit the Airbus factory because Cathay intends to change to an all-Airbus fleet - is a bit airy-fairy.

    It is no surprise to learn that our lawmakers have been accepting free trips from airlines since 2005, to mark such events as the delivery of a new jetliner or the opening of a new route, theoretically gaining a better grasp of aviation development and its latest technical advances.

    We also learned from neo-democrat Gary Fan Kwok-wai, who was not invited and may have been suffering from a mild attack of sour grapes, that "it was rare" for Cathay to invite only some of the lawmakers. The inference here is that in previous cases the airline has invited all members of the Legislative Council (LegCo) - but, if that really did happen, nobody blabbed about it afterwards. Fan added that "lawmakers should judge prudently whether to accept such an invitation, to avoid giving the public the impression that they will benefit from the trip."

    Claudia Mo Man-ching pointed out that none of the six Civic Party legislators was invited - which, in a way, could be interpreted as an inverted compliment. She added that the guest list gave a false impression because "they accepted the invitation as lawmakers yet took along their families". The same point also peeved her colleague Professor Kenneth Chan Ka-lok: "Visiting an Airbus factory is a business trip and it's inappropriate for the family to tag along".

    Let's get down to basics. First, there is absolutely nothing wrong with Cathay Pacific offering free "jollies" to anybody it chooses. Second, if we are absolutely honest about it, there is hardly one of us who wouldn't have put up his or her hand for a free return ticket to Paris or any other Cathay destination, especially if we were to be wined and dined in Business Class there and back. Third, if, for reasons of courtesy or whatever, Cathay chose to invite the politicians' spouses, too, that's their prerogative.

    But each and every one of those legislators is, for the term of his or her office, in a position of trust and honor to serve the Hong Kong public to the best of their ability, and should therefore be bound not to be swayed or influenced in any way in future decision-making on subjects involving Cathay, or the aviation industry generally.

    Right now Cathay is involved in a bitter fight to protect its interests against an attempt by the family of Macao casino czar, Stanley Ho Hung-sun, to horn into the Hong Kong budget airline bonanza via an aerial interloper from Australia named Jetstar, the cheap younger brother of the Australian national carrier Qantas. Leveraging on their conglomerate, Shun Tak Holdings, Ho has moved with dizzying speed on the deal, plunking down a cool $66 million into Jetstar from its previous 50-50 owners, Qantas and China Eastern Airlines, registering Jetstar Hong Kong, lodging an application with the Hong Kong government for an aviation license to operate out of Hong Kong, and getting Ho's daughter Pansy Ho Chiu-king appointed the new airline's chairman. (Ms Ho is already Shun Tak's managing director.)

    Cathay Pacific is 43 percent owned by the Swire conglomerate, with the next biggest investor being the State-owned Chinese flag carrier Air China with 30 percent.

    In total, 83 airlines operate from Hong Kong International Airport, which in 2012 handled 56 million passengers. The airport is also the world's busiest for cargo traffic, handling 4 million tons last year. Cathay is the airport's biggest user, flying from Hong Kong to 51 destinations.

    In March last year, after a painstaking study of future requirements, the Airport Authority decided that a third runway was needed. Obviously the key factor in this decision was the assumption that still more airlines, including airfreight providers, would wish to fly to and from Hong Kong. The decision also affected Cathay's future planning, and the airline plans to buy 50 Airbus aircraft over the next eight years, taking full advantage of the extra runway.

    As Hong Kong's flag carrier, and with its long-standing record of serving Hong Kong since soon after the end of World War II in 1945, Cathay should, on the one hand, be entitled to expect some preferential treatment from the government but, on the other, not want new rivals frozen out of opportunities, especially if they will offer cheaper fares. Why go to the expense of building a third runway if its use is to be restricted? And if airlines are to dictate policy, why have an Airport Authority?

    Albert Lin is a PR and media consultant.

    (HK Edition 09/13/2013 page9)

    亚洲国产精品无码久久一线| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕 | 色爱无码AV综合区| 天堂√中文最新版在线下载| 无码精品国产VA在线观看DVD | 日韩久久久久久中文人妻| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕一区| 久久精品无码专区免费青青| 精品无码国产自产在线观看水浒传| 涩涩色中文综合亚洲| 国产免费无码一区二区| 成人无码A区在线观看视频| xx中文字幕乱偷avxx| 无码中文字幕日韩专区视频| 国产高清无码视频| 黄桃AV无码免费一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区中文精品| 亚洲精品无码久久不卡| 精品无码久久久久久午夜| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区网站| 国产成人无码一区二区三区在线| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕69| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码精品| 91久久九九无码成人网站 | 天码av无码一区二区三区四区| 少妇无码AV无码专区在线观看| 亚洲精品无码永久中文字幕| 免费a级毛片无码a∨免费软件| 中文字幕日韩人妻不卡一区 | 久久久久久精品无码人妻 | 亚洲人成网亚洲欧洲无码久久| 最好看的最新高清中文视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩av乱码| 最新中文字幕在线| 炫硕日本一区二区三区综合区在线中文字幕 | 国产 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码一区二区一二区| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看性色扶 | 本道天堂成在人线av无码免费|