Opposition's latest move to reverse political trends

    Updated: 2013-09-24 07:07

    By Lau Nai-keung(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    On Sept 14, a day before the International Day of Democracy, British Foreign Office Minister of State Hugo Swire said in a newspaper opinion piece "Britain stands ready to support (Hong Kong's political reform) in any way we can." This happened half a month after Song Zhe, Beijing's top diplomat in Hong Kong, told US Consul-General Clifford Hart that our city's constitutional development is none of the US's business.

    Foreign intervention in Hong Kong's politics is nothing new. What intrigues me is the recent high-profile moves that the US and the UK must know would certainly agitate Beijing. A day after he took up the post on July 30, Hart said he was looking forward to Hong Kong's move towards "genuine democratic suffrage". Next, we saw him eating egg tarts and visiting Taoist temples Christopher Patten-style.

    The US can continue to work behind proxies like it always has, funding individuals and groups, training them and giving them instructions. Why go front stage all of a sudden?

    Perhaps it has to do with the fact that "Occupy Central" is not going as smoothly as planned. The movement's Facebook page now has 41,000 likes, and grows on average by 400 per week since the post-launch spike. The number pales in comparison to the Scholarism movement's page, which got more than 100,000 likes shortly after the group was publicized by the media.

    Opposition's latest move to reverse political trends

    At the same time, the Silent Majority for HK has reached almost 13,000 likes, and is getting 200 per week. This is the first time a pro-establishment's counter campaign has got that close. Previously Scholarism's opponents in the patriotic education episode only got a little more than 5,000 likes. This is as good as it got for mobilizing the silent majority.

    Forums organized by "Occupy Central" have seen embarrassing turnouts. A poll conducted by the Hong Kong Institute of Education in March showed respondents prefer order to democracy. All these signs and many more point to one conclusion: "Occupy" is not very popular here.

    But this is to be expected. In fact, "Occupy" can be viewed as a sign of the opposition's demise. Four major trends in Hong Kong's politics have to be considered. First, pro-British elites constructed by the colonial government in the 1970s and 1980s will soon become obsolete. This cohort had the opportunity to participate in the city's first wave of democratization, and therefore has remained a heavyweight in the dissident camp.

    Second, the pro-establishment camp is catching up in elections. Sooner or later, the dissident camp will lose its "critical minority" veto power in the Legislative Council (LegCo).

    Opposition's latest move to reverse political trends

    Third, old political icons, including Tiananmen Square, are losing effectiveness as younger generations come of age.

    Fourth, the central government and the SAR government are slowly gaining legitimacy in Hong Kong. If the 2017 election is accepted as "genuinely democratic", the dissidents will lose further leverage.

    All these trends work against the dissidents (and the foreign forces that support them), and they are clearly aware of these threats. In essence, "Occupy" is an attempt to reverse these trends. It uses the last batch of the aging moderate elites to fuel the city's budding radicalism, de-institutionalize politics by discrediting LegCo and giving primacy to mass sit-ins. It tries to recast Central as a new political symbol, and pre-empt the boost in legitimacy that universal suffrage in 2017 would create.

    "Occupy" is doomed to fail in its stated objectives. Whether it can achieve its ulterior intention - to rebalance the political landscape in Hong Kong to the opposition's advantage - remains to be seen.

    The point is, don't be smug if you find the dissidents now in bad shape. Their bosses will do whatever they can to make dissidents stay in the game. If we do not prepare for the next round of offensives, we may find ourselves in their current situation in no time.

    One of the things we should do is grab the golden opportunity provided to us by Hugo Swire. Democracy in Hong Kong is, to a certain extent, a veiled class struggle, but there is also an element of nationalism that has always been muted. Now the SAR government must emphasize that in addition to "equal representation" among Hong Kong's citizens, the design (not mere principles, but embedded in practice) of universal suffrage in 2017 must also uphold the integrity of the sovereign.

    The author is a member of the Commission on Strategic Development.

    (HK Edition 09/24/2013 page1)

    无码专区中文字幕无码| 日本中文字幕网站| 天堂网www中文天堂在线| 人妻丰满av无码中文字幕| 精品人妻无码一区二区色欲产成人| 最近2019中文字幕电影1| 国产真人无码作爱免费视频| 亚洲精品无码不卡在线播HE| 最近中文字幕mv免费高清在线 | 亚洲av无码专区在线播放 | 亚洲欧美在线一区中文字幕| 亚洲毛片av日韩av无码| 办公室丝袜激情无码播放| 暴力强奷在线播放无码| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 亚洲最大激情中文字幕| 亚洲成a人无码av波多野按摩 | 刺激无码在线观看精品视频| 亚洲熟妇无码八AV在线播放| 中文字幕在线观看国产| 婷婷五月六月激情综合色中文字幕| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲成av人片在线观看天堂无码| 天天看高清无码一区二区三区| 无码av免费一区二区三区试看 | 国产午夜无码专区喷水| 成在人线av无码免费高潮水 | 国产精品无码一区二区在线观一| 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕系| 日韩精品无码熟人妻视频| 亚洲真人无码永久在线| 亚洲一区精品无码| 亚洲日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳AV| 特级无码毛片免费视频尤物| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久| 国产精品无码久久综合| 成人午夜福利免费专区无码| 亚洲午夜无码片在线观看影院猛| 中文国产成人精品久久不卡|