Globalization and nation-states

    Updated: 2013-10-24 06:42

    By Yang Sheng(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    I recently had the pleasure of attending a lecture on the relationship between globalization and national sovereignty by Yu Keping, deputy director of the Central Compilation and Translation Bureau of the Communist Party of China and professor of political science at Peking University known for his insight on and knowledge about democracy theories. His lecture prompted me to consider a host of related hot topics in Hong Kong society today.

    The modern definition of national sovereignty took shape with the emergence of the Westphalia System in the 15th century. And national sovereignty has been at the heart of political life of human society ever since. However, globalization has dragged almost all nations of the world into a politico-economic integration process and interactive network, whereby no country can keep its internal affairs from being affected by external factors.

    Globalization has caused major adjustments in the three main components of a nation-state - territory, sovereignty and people - and shaken the very foundation of the traditional image of a nation in people's mind. There is no better example of this phenomenon than the European Union (EU). Although the passports EU member states issue to their citizens are different, 26 of them have lifted border controls according to the Schengen Agreement and, as a result, people driving on continental highways sometimes fail to realize they have crossed into a neighboring country. The EU is becoming a unified federal country in terms of trade and finance but resembles a confederation of independent states in terms of internal affairs, national defense and foreign relations. Without a unified central administration, legislature or fiscal budget, the citizens of EU member states have their respective nationalities but not a common identity. Some scholars therefore see it as a "confederation" that resembles a country in some ways and a super-country in others.

    By nature a global market is in conflict with the traditional principles of a sovereign state. Throughout the world one of the current trends in political development in individual countries or regions amid economic globalization is the decentralization of political power. Multinational corporations, such as Apple, Boeing, Microsoft, Google, Facebook and Twitter, are influencing many nation-states' politico-economic progress, subtly or otherwise. Market control and management, traditionally a function of the state, has now largely been taken over by supranational organizations. In other words, nation-states often find themselves powerless in front of the world market as their traditional functions have been seriously weakened.

    Globalization and nation-states

    As such, no single nation-state today can regulate the global financial market on its own.

    The international factor has become a critical variant in limiting individual countries' internal political development. No country, even one as powerful the US, Russia, China, Japan, Germany or France, can make decisions on major national issues without fully considering the effect of the international environment on such decisions and the effect of such decisions on the international environment.

    Some new concepts of statehood and sovereignty have emerged against this historical backdrop. One of the more influential theories is "the demise of the nation state", as some scholars have simply called globalization a process of "denationalization"; while others believe that national sovereignty in its traditional sense has begun crumbling and is now obsolete, as the "post-Westphalia" era in international politics has arrived. Still others have gone so far as to assert that globalization has laid a profound and realistic foundation for a world government, making it more necessary than ever to create a "world government" for the "world community".

    Meanwhile, some theorists have put forward the concept of "neo-imperialism", saying it is the latest development of the traditional imperialism, which in essence represents efforts by Western developed nations to impose their own culture, values, political system and ideology on other countries through economic expansion and financial monopoly, in total disregard of existing national sovereignty as they openly seek global hegemony.

    Whether these theories hold water or not, it is an undeniable fact that globalization has significantly changed the traditional idea of national sovereignty. A new world order suitable to the advancement of globalization has emerged. Therefore it is necessary to turn traditional international cooperation into globalized regulation. It will be an enormous systematic undertaking.

    The author is a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 10/24/2013 page8)

    国产成人A亚洲精V品无码| 伊人久久精品无码二区麻豆| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区DV| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕图| 无码国产精成人午夜视频一区二区| 欧美激情中文字幕| 狠狠噜天天噜日日噜无码| 中文自拍日本综合| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区蜜桃| 无码无套少妇毛多18PXXXX| 在线中文字幕精品第5页| 中文无码字慕在线观看| 69久久精品无码一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区二区三区| 久久五月精品中文字幕| 中文资源在线官网| 免费A级毛片无码鲁大师| 精品无码人妻一区二区三区品 | 国产精品无码无需播放器| 人妻少妇AV无码一区二区| 天堂中文字幕在线| 日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲日韩v无码中文字幕| 手机在线观看?v无码片| 国产成人无码A区在线观看视频 | 精品国产一区二区三区无码| 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院| 潮喷失禁大喷水无码| 国产成人精品一区二区三区无码 | 日本中文字幕免费看| а√在线中文网新版地址在线| 中文国产成人精品久久不卡| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊| 中日精品无码一本二本三本| 熟妇人妻中文a∨无码| 中文字幕乱码久久午夜| 亚洲日韩中文无码久久| 最近免费视频中文字幕大全| 最近中文字幕在线| 中文字幕无码av激情不卡久久| 中文无码vs无码人妻|