Government must walk the talk on population and productivity

    Updated: 2013-11-18 06:35

    By Qiu You(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    We have long known that Hong Kong is facing the challenge of an aging population which is undermining its sustainable development and productivity. This is especially so with the until-recent influx of mainland women who gave birth locally, which further complicated the city's demographics and socio-economic circumstances. When Chief Secretary Carrie Lam was tasked with spearheading the Steering Committee on Population Policy, the public had high hopes. After all, it was the third such exercise since the handover. But sadly, the "Thoughts for Hong Kong" consultative paper released by the committee lacks specific suggestions, and fails to provide a clear and long-term vision to shape our future.

    Yes, it is true that the recommendations contained in the consultative paper seek to improve the quality as well as the size of the city's working population. By 2041, about one-third of the city's population will be elderly, which means two adults will have to support one elderly person. The document contains five proposals to tackle the challenges: enhancing the quantity and the efficiency of the city's workforce, recruiting overseas talent and mainland labor, providing incentives to boost fertility rates and building an age-friendly environment by developing a "silver hair market". According to the paper, there will also be no change in the purpose of the One-Way Permit scheme designed primarily for family reunion while about 200,000 children born to non-local parents in the city will not be seen as a solution to the demographic impasse.

    The problem is, some suggestions are but old wine in a new bottle. The major strategies just point at a direction, however right, without telling us how the journey can be accomplished. The document just tosses about some vague and broad options without really revealing which of them would be more feasible. For example, the document lists an option of subsidizing infertile couples choosing to employ assisted reproductive technology (ART) so as to boost the current birth rate that stood at 1.3 children per woman in 2012. But our healthcare chief Ko Wing-man has nixed this proposal, saying public hospitals needed to give priority to those in most urgent need of care. When even public hospitals are suffering from insufficient resources to cope with urgent cases, how can they afford to substantially extend ART services to infertile couples?

    The steering committee has placed a great deal of emphasis on importing foreign labor and overseas talent as the main channel to replenish manpower. Given the urgency to cope with the projected labor force shrinkage from 58.8 percent in 2012 to 49.5 percent in 2041, the proposed measures point at the right way. Importing low-skill workers is undeniably the quickest and most effective way to resolve the existing labor shortage at some industries, especially the so-called "3-D" (dirty, difficult and dangerous) sectors, such as construction, elderly care and catering. However, this would only be a short-term measure to cope with the current supply-demand gap when it comes to low-skill workers and technicians. In the long run, the government needs to enhance its vocational training policy to enable school leavers and little-educated people hone their skills.

    More importantly, the government should dedicate more effort to attracting overseas talent. The existing talent admission schemes have proved disappointing. As the document points out, Singapore offers a host of incentives such as housing benefits and tax concessions to lure overseas talent. In addition, it has set up 11 contact offices worldwide for an extensive "point-to-point" manpower network to reach out to target talent and offers study trips and internship programs to overseas students from top universities. In comparison, Hong Kong has been rather passive. The government must remedy this.

    Other proposed measures such as encouraging housewives and retirees to re-enter the workforce are praiseworthy. The problem is, such proposals should be buttressed by more family-friendly policies such as childcare support as well as employers' cooperation. It is up to the government to take the most appropriate policy initiatives.

    The author is a current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 11/18/2013 page9)

    精品久久久久久久久中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕精品免费一区| 天堂在线资源中文在线8| 一本色道无码道DVD在线观看| 亚洲人成无码网WWW| 性无码专区无码片| 中文字幕无码一区二区三区本日| 国产精品午夜无码AV天美传媒 | 亚洲成AV人片天堂网无码| 人妻丰满?V无码久久不卡| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 乱人伦中文视频高清视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜乱一区三区| 国产精品无码久久久久| 亚洲精品无码久久久久| 无码播放一区二区三区| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久久不卡| 天堂а在线中文在线新版| 无码高清不卡| 免费VA在线观看无码| h无码动漫在线观看| 精品无码久久久久国产| 亚洲AV无码国产在丝袜线观看| 一本一道AV无码中文字幕| 国产成人A亚洲精V品无码| 中文字幕无码播放免费| 无码国产精品一区二区免费虚拟VR| 久久精品中文字幕有码| 欧美日韩不卡一区二区三区中文字| 日本精品久久久久中文字幕| 欧美日韩国产中文高清视频| 无码日韩人妻AV一区免费l| 无码人妻AⅤ一区二区三区水密桃| 国产亚洲精久久久久久无码AV | 波多野结衣中文在线| 超清无码无卡中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩2019 | 无码精品A∨在线观看| 少妇无码一区二区二三区| 精品无码一区二区三区爱欲九九| 人妻少妇乱子伦无码视频专区|