Macao governance issue offers lessons for HK

    Updated: 2014-06-05 06:31

    By Zhou Bajun(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    The Macao Special Administrative Region (MSAR) is a very small territory with a population of 560,000 living on 31.3 square kilometers of land. But, it is seen by many Hongkongers as a wonderful place which they like to visit. The gambling industry is the backbone of Macao's economy. For many years the city, packed with glitzy casinos, has been dubbed the "Las Vegas of the East". In recent years, it has even replaced Las Vegas as the gambling capital of the world in terms of casino earnings. According to a report in American news magazine Businessweek, the gambling industry contributed $45 billion to Macao's annual revenue in 2013 - compared with Las Vegas' $38 billion.

    But on May 25, thousands of Macao residents surprised the outside world by taking to the streets. They were protesting against a bill that would give a retirement package to the city's outgoing chief executive (CE) and top officials. According to the bill, the Macao CE, upon retiring, would enjoy a monthly pension of up to 70 percent of his or her monthly salary as the CE. While the retired top ministers will receive a severance package calculated with a formula which takes the number of months they served in public office multiplied by the sum of their monthly salaries and then multiplied again by a coefficient varying from 0.14 to 0.30 depending on seniority. This sounds like a lot of money for civil servants, but it is really not as impressive as similar retirement packages offered by businesses and private institutions. Who is to say they don't deserve it?

    Macao governance issue offers lessons for HK

    Remember, Macao is a wealthy city. Its per capita GDP is No 2 in Asia and among the top 10 in the world. Macao residents have more entitlements than their Hong Kong counterparts. Every year since 2008 (the ninth anniversary of the MSAR's handover to China) its residents have received a cash handout. Since 2013, the amount paid to every qualified person was increased to 9,000 Macao pataca. No wonder many people outside Macao were surprised by the May 25 protests.

    The Macao government responded quickly to the demonstration. On May 26, Chief Executive Fernando Chui Sai-on postponed voting on the bill in the Legislative Council (LegCo) - originally scheduled for May 27. That day, hundreds of Macao residents protested outside the LegCo building. They demanded the government withdraw the bill for good. Facing the biggest demonstrations since the 1999 handover, Chui revoked the bill on May 29.

    In terms of modern standards of governance, the Macao government messed up its own record with its handling of this controversial bill. As some critics noted: "How could a government submit a bill to the legislature without first consulting its people?"

    This careless mistake exposed chronic problems in the approach of the Macao government - the government has been buying public support with cash handouts instead of winning popular approval with effective social policies. Worse, it has failed to introduce policies to save the economy from over reliance on the gambling industry.

    The political situation in Macao is a warning for Hong Kong. Over the past 11 years, Hong Kong has experienced numerous large-scale demonstrations over political, economic and social issues. Although politics has been the main cause of these troubles, as I have previously noted, they have also been caused by a lack of modern governance skills by the Hong Kong government. Hong Kong's second CE, in particular, did not work effectively enough to advance economic and social development. Although he offered each Hong Kong citizen more than HK$1,000 in annual cash handouts for several years in a row, this did not work in his favor.

    Current CE, Leung Chun-ying, has been attempting to address some of the problems left by his predecessor. Nevertheless, on May 26, he blundered when he was quoted as saying that a 20 percent cut in mainland visitors was an option being considered by the government. The blunder caused panic on the equities market the next day - as major retail and property stocks fell. This was due to investor uncertainty over a possible sharp drop in mainland visitor spending in Hong Kong. The government lost little time trying to assure the markets. Leung explained publicly that the government was merely "listening to views" on how to deal with the problem of controlling the rising number of mainland visitors.

    As I explained in a column on May 14 the Hong Kong government is partly to blame for the negative effects of the recent influx of mainland visitors. Effective measures should be taken to cushion the growing impact on public facilities without seriously affecting the economy. It is a particularly sensitive time in the relationship between Hong Kong and the mainland. A great deal of finesse and sensitivity is required. The SAR government should keep in mind that reducing the inflow of mainland visitors would most certainly hurt the economy. Today, policy-making which is neither feckless nor reckless lies at the heart of good governance.

    The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 06/05/2014 page9)

    在线观看无码AV网站永久免费| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲 | 久久青青草原亚洲av无码app| 18禁网站免费无遮挡无码中文| 日韩人妻精品无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕国产在线| 无码av中文一二三区| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看富二代| 最近2022中文字幕免费视频| 国产精品无码免费专区午夜| 乱人伦中文视频在线| 亚洲成a人片在线观看无码专区| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲精品国产日韩无码AV永久免费网 | 亚洲精品无码专区在线在线播放| 日韩中文字幕在线| 伊人久久无码精品中文字幕| 国产做无码视频在线观看浪潮| 亚洲日产无码中文字幕| 最近最新高清免费中文字幕| A狠狠久久蜜臀婷色中文网| 天堂网www中文在线| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品| 亚洲AV无码国产精品麻豆天美| 伊人久久精品无码av一区| 无码av中文一二三区| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕一冢本 | 人看的www视频中文字幕| 无码人妻AⅤ一区二区三区水密桃| 精品无码一区在线观看| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 亚洲色偷拍另类无码专区| 亚洲av永久无码制服河南实里| 国产成人精品一区二区三区无码 | 免费A级毛片无码A∨中文字幕下载 | 最新无码A∨在线观看| 四虎影视无码永久免费| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区蜜桃 | 亚洲AV无码不卡在线播放| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码网站 | 无码人妻视频一区二区三区|