HK needs to change attitude to visitors

    Updated: 2014-06-09 07:10

    By Song Sio-chong(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Hong Kong is facing a dilemma over the influx of mainland tourists coming here under the Individual Visit Scheme (IVS).

    Of course, many people recognize the value and benefits the scheme has brought to Hong Kong's economy since it was implemented in mid-2003. Last year, more than 41 million mainlanders visited the SAR - more than 28 million through this scheme. Mainland tourists have contributed much towards generating revenue and employment opportunities in the retail industry. Without this, we would probably have experienced another economic recession similar to that of 2003.

    But the scheme has also been widely criticized by local people. They complain about streets, shops and public transport being over-crowded because of too many visitors from the mainland.

    Demand for many items in Hong Kong shops has increased, putting pressure on rents, while inconveniencing local consumers who must compete for those categories of goods popular with shoppers from the mainland.

    Some political activists have launched the "anti-locust" campaign and other protests against mainlanders. This has sparked animosity among Hongkongers and mainlanders, and has been widely reported in the media on both sides of the border.

    Hong Kong faces a major challenge in resolving these issues. It is a test for the SAR government, its leaders and for the "One Country, Two Systems" principle.

    At a meeting with the Commission on Strategic Development on May 26, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying floated the idea of a 20 percent reduction in visitor numbers as a possible solution. The following day, financial markets reacted negatively to this. Share prices for property developers and retailers, such as Wharf, Hysan, Sa Sa, and Chow Tai Fook, dropped more than 3 percent.

    HK needs to change attitude to visitors

    However, there is no need to panic about this. Our neighbor Macao, with a much smaller population and geographical area, copes with similar numbers of mainland visitors. But Macao does not complain about them. Indeed, it is preparing ambitious plans to transform itself into one of the world's leading tourist and leisure hubs.

    If Macao can do this then why can't Hong Kong? I frequently ask myself and others this question. Hong Kong's circumstances would seem to be 10-20 times better than Macao's in terms of economic strength, population, size of territory, topography and even skilled workers. In terms of shopping, Hong Kong long ago surpassed Macao. Hong Kong also has a better physical environment for tourists. What Hong Kong is lacking is, perhaps, the right spiritual values or attitude.

    An English proverb says, "Do not throw out the baby with the bath water". But Hong Kong appears to be playing with the idea of discarding them both.

    In other tourist centers around the world, no politician would dare to curb the number of tourists visiting. Any restrictions would be not only unworkable, but self-defeating, creating more problems than it would solve.

    There would be many adverse effects on Hong Kong if fewer tourists came. There would be an increase in our unemployment rate and a decrease in production for industries catering to tourists. Tourism is one of four key industries in Hong Kong. Our reputation as a free port, which is guaranteed by the Basic Law, would also be hurt.

    The mainland has provided a fine example in showing that many problems can be resolved by further economic development. This philosophy has worked in the mainland for over three decades. I believe the IVS is another aspect of the mainland's economic miracle. Instead of complaining about it, I prefer to think of the many economic opportunities it can continue to bring to Hong Kong.

    Such opportunities include speeding up the refurbishment of industrial buildings for commercial use; building new shopping malls near the border; developing hotels in different locations; improving infrastructure; and building new tourist attractions. But most importantly, our attitude towards our fellow countrymen needs to change.

    So far we have never had a government bureau dedicated to decision-making, policy-planning, or coordinating work among the various governmental departments with reference to tourism. I suggested years ago that such a bureau be set up and headed by a principal official. I hope the present government will still take up this idea.

    The author is a HK veteran commentator and professor at the Research Center of Hong Kong and Macao Basic Law, Shenzhen University.

    (HK Edition 06/09/2014 page1)

    中文字幕在线免费观看| 国产强伦姧在线观看无码| 亚洲精品无码日韩国产不卡?V| 在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 亚洲人成国产精品无码| 亚洲AV无码码潮喷在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久中文字幕| 天码av无码一区二区三区四区| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区| 日本一区二区三区中文字幕 | 人妻无码久久精品| 亚洲A∨无码无在线观看| 欧美日韩中文国产va另类电影| 人妻少妇无码视频在线| 国产精品亚洲а∨无码播放| 国产又爽又黄无码无遮挡在线观看| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 无码色AV一二区在线播放| 久久久久亚洲AV无码麻豆| 亚洲熟妇无码八AV在线播放| 少妇无码太爽了在线播放| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 久久精品中文字幕久久| 中文字幕av无码专区第一页| 亚洲AV无码资源在线观看| 免费无码一区二区| 国产精品热久久无码av| 国产精品无码无卡在线播放| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久久| 中文字幕无码第1页| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 亚洲日韩VA无码中文字幕| 免费无码又爽又刺激网站直播| 合区精品中文字幕| 中文字幕精品一区二区三区视频| 久久有码中文字幕| 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 极品粉嫩嫩模大尺度无码视频 | 中文字幕无码精品三级在线电影| 在线观看中文字幕码| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看|