Benny Tai's Bloomberg remarks are irresponsible

    Updated: 2014-09-04 07:35

    By Lau Nai-keung(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Benny Tai's Bloomberg remarks are irresponsible

    Benny Tai Yiu-ting has difficulty understanding the difference between idealism and pragmatism. These two beliefs are usually thought of as being opposites, and therefore one must choose one or the other.

    Idealism is the belief that we should adopt moral principles, even if they have a negative effect on our lives. The idealist is willing to suffer in order to do what he thinks is right. An example of an idealist is a monk who takes a vow of poverty, sacrificing his material interest in order to follow his moral ideals.

    Pragmatism is a rejection of idealism. If idealist principles get in the way, the pragmatist resolves this by rejecting moral principles. A pragmatist does whatever is deemed practical, with much less concern about morality.

    This idealism/pragmatism dichotomy is somewhat imposed, as in reality we are more often than not in the middle, and are more properly labeled as being either idealistic pragmatists or pragmatic idealists. However, Benny Tai has given the "Occupy Central" movement a highly idealistic approach from the very beginning. The "manifesto" of the movement proclaims: "If the authorities concerned ignore the democratic demands of the citizens and suggest an election method, which violates the corresponding international standards, we shall at the appropriate time carry out acts of civil disobedience, including 'Occupy Central'." He has famously referred to the tactics of mass protests as an "atomic bomb", arguing they have the ability to paralyze Central and force the central government into submission.

    A couple of days ago, Tai told Bloomberg that when business executives know the details of when "Occupy" will be launched, they will realize the movement has no intention of damaging the economy of Hong Kong. "Even though I cannot mention the date, but if you look at the calendar, you would know which date would cause the minimal damage to Hong Kong's economy," Tai said.

    All of a sudden, the "atomic bomb" becomes one that would cause minimal damage. In other words, Tai and his idealistic friends turn out to be pragmatists. Perhaps they thought they could call Beijing's bluff. But this sudden change of direction is highly irresponsible.

    Benny Tai's Bloomberg remarks are irresponsible

    After Tai's Bloomberg appearance, people have the impression that the original organizers are now stepping back, and radicals will step in to control the movement. This trend is already apparent as students are now planning to "boycott" classes.

    Tai is not the only irresponsible academic around. There are a lot of them. The head of the University of Hong Kong has announced that students and staff members are free to take part in "Occupy" and other protests, adding that legal advice would be provided to anyone arrested during a demonstration. A couple of other universities are also saying that they will accommodate the students' "boycott."

    While university students have the right not to attend classes and many habitually don't, it is hard to understand why the universities approve of this. Our university heads can join the "civil disobedience movements" and be arrested, but it is irresponsible for them to encourage students to do the same. If they do not know where to draw the line, then perhaps they should not be in their jobs.

    Tai told the truth in the Bloomberg interview: He said the number of people joining "Occupy" would not be as many as expected, because of the "very pragmatic thinking of Hong Kong people". Accepting the ruling of the National People's Congress Standing Committee would be in line with Hongkongers' pragmatism. Therefore our legislators, especially those from the "pan-democratic" camp should vote for the coming political reform proposal.

    After Tai's Bloomberg appearance, "Occupy" released a statement saying "it is not correct to say that we have less support from the community after Beijing made the decision. Although some pragmatic supporters may leave, new supporters are joining us because they are angry about the Chinese government's decision and are firm to show the dignity and willpower of Hongkongers." Notwithstanding the discrepancies between the statement and Tai's comments, the most responsible thing for "Occupy" to do is to call an end to the campaign. This would prevent the radicals from letting things get out of control.

    The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

    (HK Edition 09/04/2014 page1)

    东京热加勒比无码视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合中文字幕 | 成人免费无码H在线观看不卡| 国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产成人无码a区在线视频| 亚洲日本中文字幕一区二区三区| 无码专区一va亚洲v专区在线| 亚洲AV无码一区二区二三区入口 | 永久免费无码网站在线观看个| 亚洲动漫精品无码av天堂| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路百度 | 中文字幕无码播放免费| 中文无码制服丝袜人妻av| 国产50部艳色禁片无码| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看你懂的| 日本不卡中文字幕| 中文无码不卡的岛国片| 久久久91人妻无码精品蜜桃HD| 无码一区二区三区视频| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2017| 中文字幕国产91| 婷婷五月六月激情综合色中文字幕| 最近2019中文免费字幕在线观看 | 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费| 亚洲av无码成人精品国产| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无码AV| 国模GOGO无码人体啪啪| 无码国产精品一区二区免费3p| 日韩a级无码免费视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区中文精品 | 亚洲制服中文字幕第一区| 中文 在线 日韩 亚洲 欧美| 亚洲国产精品无码久久青草| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线水卜樱 | 亚洲福利中文字幕在线网址| 中文字幕高清在线| 国产日韩精品中文字无码| 中文字幕在线最新在线不卡| 乱人伦中文视频高清视频|