Hong Kong's opposition camp: time to step back?

    Updated: 2014-09-26 08:20

    By Tim Collard(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    There is a French phrase - "reculer pour mieux sauter". It means to take a step back to ready oneself for a further jump forward. Although there has been something of a gap in the confrontation building throughout the summer over the arrangements for the 2017 Chief Executive election, the issue of student boycotts and the continuing threat of "Occupy Central" activities make it clear that the issues are not going to be quietly forgotten as the central government and the Hong Kong establishment would no doubt wish.

    However, when one has something to say, there are more and less effective ways of saying it.

    It has become uncomfortably clear the forces of opposition to the central government's plans were wrong-footed in the summer: The issue of the white paper provoked a rapid build-up of anger on the streets which had largely run out of steam by the time the actual announcement emerged at the end of August, leaving the prospects for the "Occupy Central" campaign less promising than they looked in July.

    In this, the central government showed a good grasp of tactics, luring the opposition into a failure of timing. The current situation is that the government has a clear position, which has attracted acceptance among moderate Hongkongers, while the opposition is in some disarray regarding both methods and objectives.

    A successful campaign to reject proposals of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) risks a simple reversion to the 2012 election process, and a further five-year delay in the implementation of universal suffrage.

    A display of intransigence, for example by maintaining the confrontational approach of boycotts and occupation, is partly explained by the wish to save face by not being seen to back down; it also suggests a lack of capacity to respond to changed circumstances, the absence of a plan B.

    The plan B will not emerge immediately - it will take some thought. This means a break from open confrontation. A boycott of classes need not cause much trouble or provoke too much in the way of a reaction: Any attempt at implementing the full "Occupy Central" plan must ensure it isn't counter-productive and doesn't lead activists to cling intractably to ultimately indefensible positions.

    It is never good to pursue tactics for which one's opponents are well prepared. This will enable the opponent to seize control of the battleground.

    If "Occupy Central" is still the preferred modus operandi, it should be conducted so as to avoid being sufficiently disruptive to invite a crushing, pre-planned response. Ill-thought-out actions damage both the movement itself and the levels of sympathy it attracts.

    However, these are questions of tactics; and tactics ought always to be subordinate to strategy. What is the opposition trying to achieve? It should now be clear that the available options are the proposed procedure under universal suffrage and the previous procedure without it. The former is surely preferable, even though it may be imperfect: What system isn't? The aim of the "pan-democrat" camp should therefore be to extend democratic freedom and popular influence as far as it can within the existing parameters. Yes, candidates for the position of Chief Executive will have to have Beijing's approval to stand for election - but they will also have to earn the approval of Hong Kong people to achieve it.

    It will not do to simply regard the NPCSC's decision as a defeat to which the only response can be desperate last-ditch resistance. It should be regarded as the basis for considered thought regarding the next steps.

    First, make sure the next steps have the broadest possible support base. Outright rejection of current proposals will not only fail to impress Beijing - it will also fail to impress the moderate majority of Hongkongers. Find a few issues on which there is genuine strong concern, and campaign on those issues, ensuring that no candidate for Chief Executive will be able to afford to ignore these issues when standing for election. There are plenty of such issues which do not transcend the boundaries of "One Country, Two Systems".

    Finally, choose your battleground and your timing carefully. Nothing will be achieved by a great outburst of passion which goes off at half-cock and then disappears in a puff of smoke, requiring yet another tactical and strategic rethink.

    Serious political campaigning may well require sacrifices - make sure these sacrifices are for an identifiable cause and an achievable aim. Don't waste enthusiasm and endanger your own and Hong Kong's future for an impossible dream.

    The author is a former UK diplomat specializing in China. He spent nine years as an analyst in Beijing. He now works as a freelance writer and commentator.

    (HK Edition 09/26/2014 page10)

    亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆| 日本久久久久久中文字幕| 久久无码AV中文出轨人妻| 精品久久久久久久无码| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV男同| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区| 忘忧草在线社区WWW中国中文| 久久亚洲精品成人av无码网站| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久一本| 亚洲AV无码一区二区一二区| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕| 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕视频在线| 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区天堂| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区| 人妻少妇无码视频在线| 国模GOGO无码人体啪啪| 国产成人A亚洲精V品无码| a亚洲欧美中文日韩在线v日本| 亚洲一区二区三区在线观看精品中文 | 日韩高清在线中文字带字幕| 91嫩草国产在线无码观看| 韩国免费a级作爱片无码| 无码国产午夜福利片在线观看| 无码国内精品久久综合88| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区 | 亚洲AV永久无码精品网站在线观看 | 久久久久久亚洲AV无码专区| 亚洲日韩精品一区二区三区无码 | 韩国三级中文字幕hd久久精品| 熟妇人妻无码中文字幕| 中文字幕丰满伦子无码 | 中文字幕乱码人在线视频1区| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区网站| 亚洲av无码天堂一区二区三区 | 无码国产亚洲日韩国精品视频一区二区三区| 国产成人精品无码片区在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品无码 |