Housing Fund a sensible decision

    Updated: 2015-01-05 06:18

    By Raymond So(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Hong Kong has a serious housing problem. Solving it is now a major government priority. According to the government's recently announced Long-Term Housing Strategy, 290,000 public housing units, both public rental housing and home ownership scheme units, will be built. Although this 290,000 number is still believed by many to be insufficient, it has almost twice the amount currently being produced. On average, the current number of public housing units being built annually is around 15,000 units. This sharp increase in housing production obviously exerts considerable financial pressure on the Housing Authority (HA).

    The HA' s cash and investment balance is, therefore, likely to fall significantly. The existing balance is over HK$60 billion, but estimates show it will decline to around HK$28 billion in four years. Simple arithmetic tells us that when more housing units are added to the list, the HA will have insufficient funds to meet its needs.

    On different occasions, the HA has publicly discussed the financial difficulties it faces. In this year's budget speech, Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah asked the HA to estimate the financial gap which will result from the provision of further public housing. This is so the government can prepare for it. A long-term housing strategy cannot be accomplished without a strong financial commitment from the government. But how much money should it inject into the HA and when? The government already has to fund many public services. Although housing is a top priority, healthcare, education, social welfare are also important. The government should not be pressured to support public housing at the expense of other social services. The allocation of public resources clearly must be handled with great care.

    Housing Fund a sensible decision

    So the financial secretary was right when he said establishing a housing fund was timely and sensible. Of course, whatever the government does will always attract criticism. But people should not be too quick to criticize.

    Estimating the fiscal gap faced by the Housing Authority is a difficult task. As the HA is a self-financing organization, Hong Kong cannot build endless public housing units because resources are limited. According to new housing construction indicators, a huge capital injection from the government may be necessary. This has also been suggested by the financial secretary's blog postings - the government is worried about having to commit over HK$100 billion. While this is a lot, but Hong Kong can still handle this because of its large financial reserves. Nevertheless, the housing problem is not a one-off issue. Another long-term housing strategy will be needed after the current one ends. If the HA cannot be self-financing in the long term, it may have to seek further funding from the government. Clearly this will be a considerable financial burden for the government.

    Because of these considerations, the proposed housing fund is necessary. The idea behind it is simple: it intends to set aside more reserves during the good years so the HA has adequate financial resource when more are needed. The beauty of the fund is that it is specifically designated for public housing; financial resources for the fund will not be used in other areas. If there was not such a fund, future use of financial resources in public housing could not be guaranteed. It is possible that financial or political considerations might even prevent the government investing in public housing in future. Therefore, the establishment of the fund also demonstrates the long-term commitment of the government.

    Another advantage of the fund is that money can be accumulated gradually. This will probably mean it will only have a minimal impact on the government's current public spending.

    Of course, every government action is subject to criticism. Some people may think the fund will reduce the number of government "sweeteners" offered in future budgets. However, budgets should not always be about "sweeteners". Public finance should always aim to be an investment in the future.

    The author is the dean of School of Business in Hang Seng Management College.

    (HK Edition 01/05/2015 page1)

    亚洲AV无码片一区二区三区| 99久久国产热无码精品免费久久久久| 亚洲av无码精品网站| 少女视频在线观看完整版中文| 亚洲av无码成人黄网站在线观看| 在线免费中文字幕| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看| 色综合久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲国产中文v高清在线观看| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品无码AV红樱桃| 国产aⅴ激情无码久久| 最近中文字幕国语免费完整| 一本无码中文字幕在线观| 久久青青草原亚洲av无码| 熟妇无码乱子成人精品| 在人线AV无码免费高潮喷水| 中文字幕手机在线观看| 欧美日韩中文国产va另类| 久久精品中文字幕久久| 全球中文成人在线| 在线看中文福利影院| 特级小箩利无码毛片| 无码的免费不卡毛片视频| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 精品国精品无码自拍自在线| 乱色精品无码一区二区国产盗| 亚洲精品无码久久久影院相关影片| 国产成人无码免费看视频软件 | 无码精品日韩中文字幕| 亚洲综合av永久无码精品一区二区| 中文字幕国产91| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播| 亚洲一区日韩高清中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲伦另类中文字幕| 久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕| 韩国三级中文字幕hd久久精品| 久久精品?ⅴ无码中文字幕| 中文字幕乱人伦| 亚洲AV无码久久| 国产亚洲?V无码?V男人的天堂 |