Universal suffrage can be realized

    Updated: 2015-04-22 08:25

    By Zhou Bajun(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Zhou Bajun says the SAR government has to garner sufficient public support to press some opposition lawmakers to vote for the reform package

    Today, the SAR government unveils its proposals for the election of the Chief Executive (CE) by "one person, one vote" in 2017.

    All 27 opposition lawmakers have repeatedly said they would veto reform proposals in the Legislative Council (LegCo). They argue that these fail to meet the "international standards" required for a truly democratic and open election.

    Prior to the announcement of the reform proposal, Chief Secretary Carrie Lam met lawmakers from all political parties and some independent lawmakers. She communicated the message from Beijing to the opposition camp that there could be no retracting, revising or reversing of the National People's Congress Standing Committee's (NPCSC) August 31, 2014 decision. Lam said that in June 2010, Beijing approved the Democratic Party's "one man, two votes" proposal for the 2012 LegCo election. But there would be no last minute changes for the electoral reform package this time.

    After the reform proposal was released, the government and the "Love the Nation and Love Hong Kong" camp launched major campaigns to mobilize public support. They are still trying to encourage some opposition lawmakers to change their position and vote for the reform proposals.

    The method proposed by the government for electing the CE in 2017 is genuine universal suffrage. In granting the right of "one person, one vote" to more than 5 million qualified Hong Kong permanent residents for the CE election, the reform proposal allows for genuine competition during the process of nominating candidates. Anyone who conforms to the requirements of Article 44 of the Basic Law, and who hopes to run for election as CE in 2017, will require only 120 nominations from members of the 1,200-strong Nominating Committee (NC) to qualify as a candidate. But a cap of 240 recommendations, which a hopeful can secure from the NC, will prevent a single aspirant from getting the support of an absolute majority of the NC. This would allow five to 10 aspirants to become potential candidates. Of these, the NC will select two or three as formal candidates.

    Based on the current political situation in Hong Kong, one or two representatives from the opposition camp could pass the "threshold" needed to become potential candidates. Whether or not any of them would be able to garner over 600 votes from the NC members to become a formal candidate depends on the preferences of NC members.

    Some argue that the formation of the NC for selecting the CE by universal suffrage in 2017 is the same as for the 2012 CE Election Committee (EC). Therefore, potential candidates from the opposition camp would be excluded from the list of formal CE candidates.

    But this is not a valid argument. First, the members of 1,200-strong NC won't be the same as those of the EC. Second, the function of the NC is different from that of the EC. Third, the NC will vote for CE candidates by secret ballot. This is different from the EC voting for the CE. The opposition camp will have the chance to lobby some NC members. The city's political landscape is changing dramatically. While competition for the 2012 CE election was fierce, the forthcoming 2017 CE election is expected to be even more fierce. But it is wrong to believe that the 2017 CE election will be controlled by anyone.

    Nevertheless, the reform proposal is unlikely to please even the so-called moderate "pan-democrats". They still oppose the requirement that potential candidates, who have already secured 120 recommendations from the NC, must also gain the support of more than half of the NC members to qualify as formal candidates for the CE election. The government, therefore, has to garner sufficient public support to make it work.

    Hong Kong people must understand that the election of the CE by universal suffrage in 2017 has to be conducted in strict accordance with the "One Country, Two Systems" principle. The requirement that CE candidates secure the votes of over half of NC members is to ensure the election of a CE acceptable to the central government. This is crucial for the continued implementation of the "One Country, Two Systems" policy. The assumption is that, according to the current political situation in Hong Kong, more than half of NC members would back the principle of "One Country, Two Systems".

    A taskforce including representatives of five opposition parties, the Hong Kong Federation of Students and Scholarism, is finalizing details of a so-called referendum. This would be triggered by Democratic Party lawmaker Albert Ho's resignation from LegCo.

    The "referendum" will ask people to vote on whether the Basic Law's articles on the reform of the LegCo and CE elections should be amended. This again shows that achieving universal suffrage in Hong Kong is an extremely difficult task for the government, the patriotic camp and ordinary citizens.

    Universal suffrage can be realized

    (HK Edition 04/22/2015 page10)

    波多野结衣中文字幕免费视频| 精品无人区无码乱码毛片国产| 国产精品一区二区久久精品无码 | 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕蜜桃| 99在线精品国自产拍中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜果冻不卡 | 亚洲日本中文字幕天天更新 | 天堂在/线中文在线资源官网| 精品国产一区二区三区无码| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲 | 日韩AV无码中文无码不卡电影| 无码国内精品久久人妻| 国内精品久久久人妻中文字幕| 免费无码黄十八禁网站在线观看 | 无码人妻丰满熟妇精品区| 日本高清免费中文在线看| 中文字幕7777| 久久无码人妻精品一区二区三区| 色窝窝无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码一区二区免费| 欧美麻豆久久久久久中文| 人妻AV中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码AV男人的天堂不卡| AAA级久久久精品无码片| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费| 18禁超污无遮挡无码免费网站| 亚洲av午夜国产精品无码中文字| 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 精品人妻va出轨中文字幕| 日韩久久久久久中文人妻| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区| 91中文在线视频| 日本久久久精品中文字幕| 在线播放中文字幕| 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产| 久久亚洲精品成人无码网站| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 亚洲gv猛男gv无码男同短文| 少妇无码一区二区二三区|