The city should learn from Finland

    Updated: 2015-05-26 06:59

    By Ronald Ng(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Ronald Ng says the example of Finland after World War II and its pragmatic approach to Russia offers important lessons for HK in its relationship with the mainland

    Finland for a long time had a chequered relationship with Russia, and in World War II it actually fought on the side of Germany against Russia. But at the Paris Peace Treaty of 1947, it managed to retain its independence and maintained its system of parliamentary democracy. However, realpolitik dictated that it must not offend the then Soviet Union. It signed an Agreement of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance with the Soviet Union in 1948 and it never opposed the Soviet Union in its foreign policy. There was also considerable self-censorship in its mass media. The term "Finlandization" was coined and first used in Germany to describe that situation where a small country, in order to maintain its sovereignty, has to behave in certain manner so as not to irritate a powerful neighbor.

    During the years of the cold war, this was how Finland acted toward the Soviet Union, and Finland was a sovereign independent nation.

    Although Hong Kong is not an independent country, it has a high degree of autonomy, with its own legal system, its own currency and financial policy, its own rules in regulating its borders, issues its own passports and even signs trade agreements with foreign countries. But the central government takes care of its foreign policy and defense.

    The city should learn from Finland

    Recently, former chief executive Tung Chee-hwa told a press conference that even members of the opposition might have a chance to become Chief Executive. He said the only people who do not have a chance are those who oppose the Communist Party of China (CPC). But if one thinks about this logically and realistically then isn't this obvious? Finland, an independent sovereign nation, for reasons of realpolitik, understood how it should behave. In order for its citizens to enjoy the quality of life they have in the country, and be independent of the Soviet Union, the nation became "Finlandized". Isn't it obvious that Hong Kong should learn from Finland?

    In an earlier article, I asked the question what is democracy for? If one accepts it as being government by the people, of the people and for the people, the conclusion then must be that democracy is really for the purpose of having a government which can respond to the needs of the people. Hong Kong is a part of China, and its economic life is closely linked to the mainland. Would it be so awful if Hong Kong also became Finlandized?

    The more the "pan-democrats" decry the actions of Beijing, the more Beijing would be suspicious of the "pan-democrats" and require more rules and regulations to ensure that its position will not be endangered. Beijing fears Hong Kong being used as a base for the subversion of its body politic. It is unwise for the "pan-democrats" to visit the US and Britain and to solicit their support. Doing that not only raises eyebrows in Beijing, and arguably even legitimate suspicions. Predictably, Beijing's displeasure over such gratuitous provocation always increases. To put a stop to this vicious cycle, bridges of trust must be built between the "pan-democrats" and Beijing.

    Politicians in Hong Kong need to regard their jobs as that of promoting the welfare of the people of the SAR, instead of promoting democracy in Hong Kong and the mainland. Learn from Finland - don't comment on events on the mainland.

    The important question one has to ask regarding the proposed reforms governing the election of the new Chief Executive in 2017 is not whether this is "real democracy" or not, whatever the word "real democracy" means. The crucial question that should be asked is would that system allow Hong Kong people to elect a person who will prioritize the welfare of the people and not meddle in issues outside of his/her brief. Likewise, Hong Kong politicians should learn the lessons of Finland and refrain from intruding into affairs outside their jurisdiction. Most of all, it should stop their anti-CPC stance as it would most certainly lead to no good either in Hong Kong or the mainland. They should focus on keeping their own house in order.

    (HK Edition 05/26/2015 page9)

    亚洲午夜福利AV一区二区无码| 久久久久久无码国产精品中文字幕| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 中文字幕精品视频| 亚洲精品无码久久不卡| 日韩精品无码久久久久久 | 久久久久亚洲AV无码网站| 久久中文字幕一区二区| 一本色道无码道在线| 国产精品99精品无码视亚| 一本一道av中文字幕无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳av中文| 中文字幕无码第1页| 夜夜精品无码一区二区三区| 国产免费久久久久久无码| 成在人线av无码免费高潮水| 无码国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 无码夫の前で人妻を犯す中字 | 免费无码一区二区三区蜜桃| 最近中文字幕在线| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线水卜樱 | 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看性色扶| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮视频| 亚洲精品午夜无码专区| 精品欧洲av无码一区二区14| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区三区 | 久久精品无码一区二区无码| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区蜜桃| 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲| 亚洲日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网亚洲欧洲无码久久| 亚洲AV综合色区无码一区| 亚洲AV无码国产在丝袜线观看| 无码国内精品久久人妻| 精品爆乳一区二区三区无码av| 国产成A人亚洲精V品无码性色| AV无码一区二区大桥未久| 天堂无码在线观看| 久久精品中文字幕一区|