Hong Kong needs to develop a balanced view of innovation

    Updated: 2016-12-30 06:58

    By Naubahar Sharif(HK Edition)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    Recently several writers in these columns have called for Hong Kong to catch up with comparable economies in terms of research and development (R&D) capabilities - the means by which firms bring innovative new products to global markets. Indeed one writer, Professor Raymond So, argued recently that "Hong Kong needs more innovation to remain internationally competitive". So observed that Hong Kong lags behind in two major international competitiveness rankings in the area of innovation.

    As a professor specializing in science, technology and innovation studies, I remind my students to maintain a balanced view of innovation, particularly as it occurs in Hong Kong. While some of the news about innovation in Hong Kong is less than inspiring, some is encouraging.

    There is no denying Hong Kong's lackluster performance in annual R&D spending (as a percentage of GDP). By some measures Hong Kong is very much a laggard, especially compared with neighboring East Asian economies. Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore, for example, annually spend roughly three to six times as much on R&D as Hong Kong.

    In terms of R&D intensity, Hong Kong more closely resembles the likes of Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. However we measure R&D, some analysts argue that Hong Kong is not a country, so it is unfair to compare it with countries that spend significant amounts on their military sectors, which typically include a sizeable R&D component. This is absolutely true.

    Hong Kong needs to develop a balanced view of innovation

    How, then, does Hong Kong compare in annual R&D expenditures, which amount here to 0.74 percent of GDP, with other cities? Consider the annual R&D expenditures as a percentage of GDP of several major Chinese mainland cities in the most recent year for which statistics are available: Beijing, 5.95 percent; Shenzhen, 3.68 percent; Shanghai, 3.66 percent; Hangzhou, 2.98 percent; Tianjin, 2.95 percent; Foshan, 2.46 percent; Chongqing, 1.42 percent: and Guangzhou, 1.25 percent.

    As these figures demonstrate, even when comparing apples with apples, Hong Kong fares poorly.

    So far I've been discussing R&D expenditures, but I have mentioned innovative products as an output of R&D. What, then, is innovation? As natural as it might seem to measure innovation by R&D activities, there is much more to it.

    Perhaps the best informal way to understand innovation would be to think of it simply as "doing something new". Doing something new requires new knowledge. Sometimes - but not always (and this is an important point) - doing something new also requires formal R&D. Crucially, though, there are legitimate forms of innovation that do not require formal science or technology spending on laboratory-based R&D.

    Considering Hong Kong's history - as multiple authors in these columns have argued - Hong Kong has always been an extremely innovative place. There is no other way to explain how it has prospered so quickly. However, innovation in Hong Kong has manifested in ways that formal R&D statistics do not capture. Beyond scientific and technological R&D, there are other aspects of innovation in which Hong Kong has established a strong tradition, profited from it and developed useful capacities.

    These capacities include:

    Absorbing global knowledge, adapting technology, and recombining and synthesizing knowledge into new productive configurations;

    Relying on agile sensitivity to changing demand to learn quickly from advanced customers and markets through creative imitation;

    Deploying organizational flexibility and orchestrating loosely coupled networks and business processes;

    Systematically developing quality control.

    If Hong Kong's strength lies in pursuing non-technological innovation, then, why should it increase R&D spending on technological innovation? Well, as Hong Kong transitions into a knowledge-based economy - the best way to ensure continued economic growth in the 21st century - it absolutely must emphasize various forms of knowledge, of which technological R&D is an extremely critical component. The goal is not, of course, to turn Hong Kong into yet another Silicon Valley, but simply to expand the economic base beyond its four pillar industries of financial services, trading and logistics, tourism, and producer and professional services. That is the key to continued growth and development.

    Still, many individuals, groups and companies in Hong Kong engage in non-R&D-related innovative activities that add value, move the economy up the value chain, increase competitiveness and contribute to rising employment. This is Hong Kong's strength, however difficult to measure it might be, and Hong Kong should continue such activities in conjunction with growing new, formal technological R&D capabilities.

    Therefore, while I agree that Hong Kong can be even more competitive in global markets by upgrading its scientific and technological capabilities (and its stellar university system can help fuel this effort), we must not neglect non-scientific and non-technological innovation - precisely the type of innovation that Hong Kong has leveraged to great effect over the past several decades.

    Combined efforts on both fronts will generate a real improvement in Hong Kong's innovative capabilities.

    (HK Edition 12/30/2016 page1)

    中文字幕精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲色无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕第3页| 无码国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 最近中文字幕完整在线看一 | 伊人久久精品无码av一区| 日韩精品无码永久免费网站| 亚洲AV无码国产在丝袜线观看| 最近更新中文字幕第一页| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久久久曰| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区免费| 中文成人无码精品久久久不卡| 熟妇人妻中文a∨无码| av区无码字幕中文色| 无码免费一区二区三区免费播放| 一本本月无码-| avtt亚洲一区中文字幕| 中文字幕无码一区二区免费| 国产成人无码精品一区在线观看 | 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16| 久久精品天天中文字幕人妻| 欧美 亚洲 日韩 中文2019| 成 人无码在线视频高清不卡| 无码人妻AⅤ一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码久久久久去q| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 精品久久久久久久中文字幕| 中文字幕视频一区| 日本成人中文字幕| 在线中文字幕播放| 中文字幕一区图| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久一本| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 亚洲激情中文字幕| 最近免费最新高清中文字幕韩国| 中文字幕欧美日韩在线不卡| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 欧美日韩中文国产va另类| 免费中文字幕视频| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院导航| 波多野结衣AV无码久久一区 |