News >Bizchina

    Anti-trust law treats 'all firms equally'

    2010-08-13 08:53

    BEIJING - China has "never discriminated" against foreign companies by using different standards in handling cases of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving the anti-trust law since its implementation in 2008, said a senior official of the Ministry of Commerce on Thursday.

    Since the Chinese government blocked a proposed bid by Coca-Cola for China's top domestic juice maker Huiyuan at a price of $2.5 billion in 2008, there have been concerns that the country is unfairly treating foreign businesses by taking advantage of the anti-monopoly law.

    The ministry said that, by the end of June, it had accepted and handled more than 140 M&A cases and approved 95 percent of them "with no strings attached".

    "It's unreasonable to conclude that China discriminates or holds any bias against foreign firms by saying that we have banned or set restrictive requirements on some foreign cases," said Shang Ming, director-general of the ministry's anti-monopoly bureau.

    The Coca-Cola bid was the only case turned down and five others were approved, although those came with additional restrictive requirements, according to the Ministry of Commerce.

    All the six cases involved foreign companies.

    He said the reason why China prohibited or set restrictive conditions on certain cases involving foreign firms is that "we found they owned a very high market share, and ... if approved, would exert negative impact on market competition".

    The ministry said in April it had also started an anti-monopoly review on a merger proposal between mining giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto's iron ore joint venture.

    China is the biggest buyer of iron ores. There were concerns that the merger of the two major mining companies would put its domestic steel industry at stake.

    Organizations representing foreign companies such as the American Chamber of Commerce in China have said major State-owned companies should also be put under scrutiny in anti-trust approval, because many of them have a monopoly position.

    Wu Hongwei, professor of law at Renmin University of China, said the accusations against China are groundless as the law is in line with international principles and are not discriminatory.

    "No one can deny the progress China has made in opening its market just because of some complaints or pressures," he said.

    The number of M&A applications presented to the ministry for approval will grow by 20 percent from a year earlier, as M&A cases worldwide are expected to pick up this year, Shang said.

    The ministry said that, during the past two years, it has found a high ratio of foreign companies among the applicants for M&A approvals.

    Under the Chinese anti-monopoly law, companies with annual turnovers of 10 billion yuan ($1.47 billion) globally and 400 million yuan in China, or combined turnovers of $2 billion in China, must get anti-trust approval for a proposed deal from the Chinese government.

    Wei Xinghua, professor of economics with Renmin University of China, said that if an M&A deal is based on market rules, no objection should be raised. However, he said many foreign companies tried to monopolize sectors through the acquisition of local companies.

    Foreign companies control 21 out of 28 major industries in the country, Wei said. In many industries, the top five players are all foreign ones, he said.

    Shang said China will try to improve the anti-trust law by drafting some supplementary rules and regulations, as the law is still quite new in China. But the improvement will be made gradually, Shang said.

    The anti-trust law took effect on Aug 1, 2008. A number of multinationals have been complaining about the slow pace and transparency of the evaluation and review process. In the case of Panasonic's takeover of Sanyo, the ministry accepted the filing four months after the company first lodged its file.

    But Shang said the complaints "do not really make sense". Under the law, there are three phases in the review.

    "Actually, in the review of majority of the cases, more than 60 percent was finished during the first phase and took less than 30 days. The rest took 90 days and even a few lasted 180 days," he said.

    Related News:

    日韩三级中文字幕| 日韩电影免费在线观看中文字幕| 中文无码久久精品| 无码人妻熟妇AV又粗又大| 熟妇女人妻丰满少妇中文字幕| 国产亚洲?V无码?V男人的天堂| 亚洲av无码国产精品色午夜字幕| 人妻AV中文字幕一区二区三区| 粉嫩高中生无码视频在线观看| 一区二区三区人妻无码| 最近中文字幕免费完整| 最近中文字幕大全免费版在线| 国产乱子伦精品无码码专区| 亚洲国产精品无码专区| 一本精品中文字幕在线| 日韩欧群交P片内射中文| 精品一区二区无码AV| 久久久久无码精品国产不卡| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 天堂网www中文天堂在线| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 国产乱妇无码大片在线观看| 少妇伦子伦精品无码STYLES| 亚洲av激情无码专区在线播放| 亚洲中文无韩国r级电影| 中文字幕一区在线观看视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 中文字幕在线观看免费视频| 久久婷婷综合中文字幕| 免费在线中文日本| 亚洲第一中文字幕| 欧美中文字幕无线码视频| 最近最新中文字幕高清免费| 最近最新中文字幕| 日韩a级无码免费视频| 免费一区二区无码东京热| 成在人线av无码免费高潮喷水| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 精品国产V无码大片在线看| 国产av无码专区亚洲av果冻传媒|