USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / World

    Air crash payouts could differ

    By Paul Elias in San Francisco | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-16 07:17

     Air crash payouts could differ

    People pay tribute to three Chinese students killed in the Asiana air crash in San Francisco on July 6, in Seoul on Monday. Provided to China Daily

     

    US citizens on Flight 214 expected to get higher damage compensation

    The potential compensation for people who were aboard Asiana Airlines Flight 214 may be very different for US citizens and passengers from other countries, even if they were seated side by side as the South Korean jetliner crash-landed.

    An international treaty governs compensation to passengers harmed by international air travel. The pact is likely to close US courts to many non-US citizens and force them to pursue their claims in Asia and elsewhere, where lawsuits are rarer, harder to win and offer smaller payouts.

    Some passengers have already contacted lawyers.

    "If you are a US citizen, there will be no problem getting into US courts. The other people are going to have a fight on their hands," said California attorney Frank Pitre, who represents two US citizens who were aboard the plane.

    The flight that broke apart on July 6 at the San Francisco airport was carrying 141 Chinese, 77 South Koreans, 64 US citizens, three Canadians, three Indians, one Japanese, one Vietnamese and one person from France when it approached the runway too low and too slow. The Boeing 777 hit a sea wall before skidding across the tarmac and catching fire.

    Three teenage girls from China were killed and more than 180 people injured, most not seriously.

    Two girls, Ye Mengyuan and Wang Linjia, both 16, died at the scene. It is unclear whether Ye died in the crash or in the chaotic aftermath.

    The third victim, 15-year-old Liu Yipeng, died on Friday at a hospital where she had been in critical condition since the crash.

    The dozens who were seriously injured - especially the few who were paralyzed - can expect to win multimillion-dollar legal settlements, as long as their claims are filed in US courts, legal experts said.

    California attorney Mike Danko, who is consulting with several lawyers from Asia about the disaster, said any passenger who was left a quadriplegic can expect settlements close to $10 million if the case is filed in the US. Deaths of children, meanwhile, may fetch around $5 million to $10 million in US courts depending on the circumstances.

    In other countries, Danko explained, the same claims could be worth far less.

    In 2001, a South Korean court ordered Korean Air Lines to pay $510,000 to a woman whose daughter, son-in-law and three grandsons were killed in the 1997 crash that killed 228 people in the US territory of Guam.

    Broken bones in plane accidents usually mean $1 million settlements in the US and in the low five-figure range overseas, Danko said.

    In 2011, the Federal Aviation Administration put the value of a human life at $6 million. But again, Danko said, that estimate applies only in US courts. Foreign courts can be expected to pay far smaller settlements.

    The South Korean government agency that regulates that country's insurance industry expects Asiana's insurers to pay out about $175.5 million in total - $131 million to replace the plane and another $44.5 million to passengers and the city of San Francisco for damage to the airport.

    The international treaty offers international passengers five options to seek compensation: where they live, their final destination, where the ticket was issued, where the air carrier is based and the air carrier's principal place of business.

    Foreign passengers who had round-trip tickets to final destinations beyond the US face tough legal challenges to pursue their claims against the airline in the United States, where courts are more receptive to lawsuits and the payouts larger than in the courts of most other nations.

    Asiana can also argue that it's more convenient for it to litigate the Asian victims' cases in Asia because all parties are based there.

    South Korean attorney Suh Dong-hee, who represented some of the victims of the 1997 Korean Air Lines crash in Guam, said family members of the victims who pursued their case in the United States settled for as much as 100 times more than those who sued in South Korea.

    But foreign passengers are still able to sue others who may have contributed to the accident, such as the plane's manufacturer, airport personnel and even, perhaps, the first responders, experts said.

    Associated Press

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    久久e热在这里只有国产中文精品99| 中文字幕一区二区人妻| 日韩亚洲不卡在线视频中文字幕在线观看 | 最新无码A∨在线观看| 少妇极品熟妇人妻无码| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区漫画 | 日本公妇在线观看中文版| 无码人妻精品中文字幕| 日本一区二区三区不卡视频中文字幕| 97免费人妻无码视频| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费n鬼沢| 最近2019年中文字幕一页| 天天爽亚洲中文字幕| Aⅴ精品无码无卡在线观看| 亚洲Av综合色区无码专区桃色 | 合区精品中文字幕| 天堂在线资源中文在线8| 国产精品xxxx国产喷水亚洲国产精品无码久久一区 | 无码8090精品久久一区| 久久亚洲AV成人出白浆无码国产| 红桃AV一区二区三区在线无码AV| 最近中文字幕免费完整| 欧美日韩中文字幕| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡| 亚洲一本大道无码av天堂| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| MM1313亚洲精品无码| 国产精品无码无卡无需播放器| 蜜桃臀无码内射一区二区三区| 亚洲av无码精品网站| 无码国产伦一区二区三区视频| 无码国内精品久久人妻蜜桃| 日韩精品无码AV成人观看| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费看| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区| 久久AV高清无码| 99国产精品无码| 无码高清不卡| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2020| 一本大道香蕉中文日本不卡高清二区| 7777久久亚洲中文字幕|