USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Road rage versus unfair criticism

    By Xin Zhiming | China Daily | Updated: 2014-05-09 07:23

    A 21-year-old Chinese, surnamed Duan, studying in the US was killed in a road accident in California recently. It was an otherwise ordinary accident, except that Duan was driving a Ferrari.

    The news of the accident generated some nasty reactions from some people, especially netizens, probably because the victim was a rich man's son. Some comments on the popular Sina micro blog are especially scathing, with one netizen saying: It's better for him to die than to kill others (while speeding).

    According to a Los Angeles Times report, however, "the Ferrari was traveling at an appropriate speed in a 35-mph (56 kilometer per hour) zone, but the Hyundai (which hit the Ferrari) was moving 'well above the posted speed limit'". Besides, the driver of the Hyundai is under investigation on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol. In fact, so far, no evidence has been found to suggest that the victim had done anything wrong.

    Last week, in an accident of a different nature in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, a BMW driven by a young man named Hu Bin overturned at a curve. Local police saw nothing unusual in the accident and said no one was injured.

    But as soon as news of Hu's involvement in the Hangzhou accident emerged, netizens criticized him for being a "show-off" who refuses to change. Some media outlets reported the accident in a similar tone.

    Perhaps Hu's background has a lot to do with it. Five years ago, Hu knocked down a pedestrian on a Hangzhou street. And although police later said that Hu was not speeding, the death of the pedestrian prompted many people to ignore the official report. Hu was sentenced to three years in prison but was released nine months earlier after his sentence was commutated.

    Despite his criminal record, there is no evidence to show Hu violated any traffic rule in last week's accident. Many netizens, however, will have none of this because of their hatred toward rich people like Hu and Duan.

    Over the past three decades, China's reform and opening-up have helped many people become rich (and some, superrich). While these people's wealth has increased exponentially, there has not been much improvement in their haughty behavior and arrogant attitude. Many media reports show China's nouveaux riches are prone to showing off their wealth in public and making reckless remarks that irritate the poor, leading to simmering resentment against them among the public.

    Although some media outlets have played a dubious role by twisting some rich people's remarks and thus misleading the people, the public resentment against the rich is perhaps rooted in the popular belief that they have accumulated wealth through dirty deals with the complicit help of corrupt officials, jeopardizing the general population's interests. Indeed, the central authorities have intensified efforts to fight corruption, but they are yet to root out such business-related corruption, which contributes to the public hatred against the rich.

    Nevertheless, critics should distinguish between rich people who have suffered tragedies, such as road accidents, without committing any mistake from the haughty and nauseating nouveau riche.

    Criticizing people like Duan and Hu even when they have committed no wrong is a dangerous social trend. It is detrimental to fostering a reasonable and constructive atmosphere for public discourse, which in turn will harm the healthy development of society as a whole.

    In a society in which holding a rational public discourse is not possible, everyone's interest, including that of the poor, will be at risk.

    To bridge the social chasm, however, we should not pin our hopes solely on the improvement in the sensibility of some irresponsible netizens. Instead, we must accelerate the pace of building a clean economy and fair society, where people can get rich through honest means, by the sheer strength of their hard work, and the rich-poor wealth gap can be gradually narrowed.

    China's Gini coefficient, widely used to gauge the wealth gap in a country, is 0.47, much above the warning line of 0.4. Only when China makes substantial headway in bridging the wealth gap can emotional outbursts and unfounded criticism against the rich diminish.

    The author is a senior writer with China Daily. xinzhiming@chinadaily.com.cn.

     

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲av永久无码精品古装片| 国产亚洲?V无码?V男人的天堂| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 日韩一本之道一区中文字幕| 亚洲AV人无码综合在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美在线a乱码日本中文字幕高清 | 亚洲一区二区三区无码影院| 国产精品无码素人福利| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产产无码乱码精品久久鸭| 日韩人妻无码精品系列| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| 日韩美无码五月天| 国产成人精品无码片区在线观看| 国产av无码专区亚洲av果冻传媒| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区 | 日韩精品无码人成视频手机| 国色天香中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲人成无码网站| 最近中文国语字幕在线播放| 中出人妻中文字幕无码| 人妻系列无码专区久久五月天| 国产亚洲精品a在线无码| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线 | 精品久久久久中文字幕一区| 无码精品蜜桃一区二区三区WW| 老子午夜精品无码| 无码国产精品一区二区免费| 中文字幕免费视频一| 一二三四社区在线中文视频| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮视频| 亚洲av无码不卡| 无码人妻久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码欧洲AV无码网站| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费东京热| 亚洲福利中文字幕在线网址| 国产欧美日韩中文字幕 | 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 中文字幕丰满乱子伦无码专区| 亚洲中久无码不卡永久在线观看|