USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Use facts to win debate on GM food

    By Xiao Xin | China Daily | Updated: 2014-10-23 07:57

    There is no sign of the debate on whether China should legalize planting of genetically modified (GM) crops, such as rice and wheat, ending anytime soon. Pro-GM and anti-GM activists both have refused to back off, leading to the two camps bickering with each other on various traditional and social media platforms.

    Debates are welcome, for they help clarify facts. But it seems both camps have failed to participate in the debate in a proper manner because they often resort to sensational wordings and present misleading facts to try to influence public opinion.

    The latest high-profile pro-GM campaign was a seminar in Wuhan, Hubei province, where 19 scientists from China and abroad discussed the development of GM foods in China. Xu Zhihong, coordinator of the seminar and an academic at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, accused anti-GM activists of being "irrational" saying their arguments are "not based on scientific assessment." Xu, former president of the influential Peking University, said the debate on safety of GM foods and related issues has prevented the public from benefiting from GM technology.

    While leveling such charges, Xu used few scientific data to prove his point. Instead, he simply repeated some statements that are often cited by pro-GM activists, such as "GM crops have increased food safety and reduced the impact of agriculture on the environment".

    In earlier discussions, pro-GM activists have alleged that the debate had "blocked China's technological advancement". Some have even labeled anti-GM activists, many of whom are not professional scientists, as "unknowledgeable laymen", hinting that they are not even entitled to participate in such discussions.

    Such arguments smack of profession-based prejudice owing to lack of data and facts and will only backfire on the pro-GM camp and leave the public less convinced about the professed safety and other benefits of GM foods.

    Some anti-GM activists have committed similar mistakes in trying to explain to the public why they oppose the technology or mass planting of GM crops. For example, some have simply accused pro-GM activists of being agents of malicious GM seed companies in Western countries that intend to thwart China's future grain security. Some of them have even called GM crop supporters hanjian, or traitors, who trade national interests for personal gains.

    It is hard for rational people to buy such sensational claims. So in the fitness of things, both sides should use rationality and facts to sell their opinions to the public.

    GM crops and food are new to many, including some scientists not familiar with the specific field of genetic engineering. As a result, there have been many academic discussions and opinions on the safety of the new strains, their ability to increase yields and their impact on the environment.

    Contrary to the expectations of industrial optimists when GM technology was first applied to crops, both cash crops and food crops, recent years have seen an increasing number of academic discussions highlighting the safety risks of GM crops and the uncertainties in increasing yields. Some scientists have warned against the potential dangers of GM crops on people's health, citing published (and peer reviewed) academic papers based on experiments. But in most of the cases, such experiments have been challenged by other scientists, leaving the public confused.

    Researchers engaged in meta-analysis of the economic benefits of GM crops, however, have found that genetic engineering technology may not necessarily lead to increased yields - and the increase in yield depends highly on the maturity of a country's farming system and infrastructure. Even a US Department of Agriculture report, which was published in February and listed many benefits of GM crops and food, admitted: "Over the first 15 years of commercial use, genetically engineered seeds have not been shown to increase yield potentials of the varieties. In fact, the yields of herbicide-tolerant or insect-resistant seeds may be occasionally lower than the yields of conventional varieties".

    Those who tout GM foods to the Chinese people, however, have often failed to tell them the other side of the story.

    The onus to use more solid scientific research results is now on those opposed to GM crops if they want their views to be accepted by the public.

    The author is a senior writer with China Daily.

     

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    中文字幕你懂得| av无码一区二区三区| 国产成人无码免费看片软件 | 国产激情无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩在线不卡| 亚洲AV无码一区东京热久久| 国产资源网中文最新版| 亚洲不卡无码av中文字幕| 色综合久久无码五十路人妻| 成人无码WWW免费视频| 一区二区中文字幕| 中文字幕久久久久人妻| 日韩久久无码免费毛片软件| 欧洲人妻丰满av无码久久不卡| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 色综合久久中文色婷婷| 中文亚洲欧美日韩无线码| 久久伊人亚洲AV无码网站| 狠狠噜天天噜日日噜无码| 亚洲AV人无码综合在线观看| 国产aⅴ无码专区亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳av中文| 中文在线资源天堂WWW| 人看的www视频中文字幕| 亚洲AV蜜桃永久无码精品| 久久久91人妻无码精品蜜桃HD| 国产av无码专区亚洲av桃花庵| 久久久久亚洲av无码专区导航| 无码AV岛国片在线播放| 久久精品无码专区免费东京热| 熟妇无码乱子成人精品| 无码囯产精品一区二区免费| 熟妇人妻中文字幕无码老熟妇| 少妇人妻无码精品视频app| 久久久久久国产精品无码超碰 | 亚洲av无码成人黄网站在线观看| 永久免费av无码网站yy| 亚洲成AV人片在线播放无码| 水蜜桃av无码一区二区| 国精品无码A区一区二区| 亚洲精品无码专区久久同性男|