USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Beggar-thy-neighbor taxation policy hurts all

    By Wolfgang Schauble | China Daily | Updated: 2014-11-05 07:59

    Thanks to technical advances in the digital economy, companies can serve markets without having to be physically present in them. At the same time, sources of income have become more mobile: There is an increasing focus on intangible assets and mobile investment income that can easily be "optimized" from a tax point of view and transferred abroad.

    Tax legislation has not kept pace with these developments. Most of the tax-allocation principles that apply today date back to a time when doing business internationally primarily meant transporting goods across a border to a neighboring country. But rules that were devised for this in the 1920s and 1930s are no longer suitable for today's international integration of economic processes and corporate structures. They need to be adapted to the economic reality of digital services.

    In the absence of workable rules, states are losing revenue that they urgently need in order to fulfill their responsibilities. At the same time, the issue of fair taxation is becoming more and more pressing, because the number of taxpayers who make an adequate contribution to financing public goods and services is decreasing.

    The resulting tensions between national fiscal sovereignty and the borderless scope of today's business activities can be resolved only through international dialogue and uniform global standards. Within the European Union, permitting groups of states to forge ahead with joint solutions to issues that can be addressed only multilaterally has worked well in the past. If such measures prove successful, other states would follow.

    This approach can also serve as a global governance model for resolving international problems. In today's world, even large states cannot establish and enforce international frameworks on their own. Groups of countries still can. This has been demonstrated in the context of financial market regulation; it is starting to become clear with regard to the regulatory framework for the digital economy, and it is now being confirmed in the area of taxation.

    The Seventh Meeting of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes was held in Berlin last week, bringing together representatives from 122 countries and jurisdictions, as well as the EU. A joint agreement on the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts was signed on Oct 29.

    The agreement is based on the Common Reporting Standard, which was developed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Under the CRS, tax authorities receive information from banks and other financial service providers and automatically share it with tax authorities in other countries.

    In the future, virtually all of the information connected to a bank account will be reported to the tax authorities of the account holder's country, including the account holder's name, balance, interest and dividend income, and capital gains.

    Various measures are in place to ensure that banks can identify the beneficial owner and notify the relevant tax authorities accordingly. The CRS thus expands the scope of cross-border, global cooperation among national tax authorities. In this way, we can establish a regulatory framework for the age of globalization.

    The automatic exchange of information is a pragmatic and effective response to the perceived lack of global governance regarding international tax issues. By making taxation fairer, governments will have a positive impact on people's acceptance of their tax regimes.

    This great success in the fight against international tax evasion would have been unthinkable only a few years ago. Now it is important to continue the efforts of the OECD and the G20 in the area of corporate taxation. We need to make sure that creative tax planning in the form of profit shifting and artificial profit reduction is no longer a lucrative business model.

    A "beggar-thy-neighbor" taxation policy, by which one country pursues tax policies at the expense of others, is just as dangerous as beggar-thy-neighbor monetary policies based on competitive currency devaluation. It leads to misallocations - and will ultimately reduce prosperity around the world.

    That is why we need to agree on uniform international standards in order to achieve fair international tax competition. The progress achieved in Berlin on the automatic exchange of tax information shows that, by working together, we can realize this goal.

    The author is Germany's Federal Minister of Finance. Project Syndicate

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲国产精品成人AV无码久久综合影院 | 精品久久久久久无码中文野结衣| 亚洲成av人片在线观看无码不卡| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 日韩精品无码熟人妻视频| 中文字幕日韩一区| 久久伊人中文无码| 无码h黄动漫在线播放网站| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看| 91精品久久久久久无码| 潮喷失禁大喷水无码| 久久ZYZ资源站无码中文动漫| 高清无码在线视频| 亚洲av永久无码精品表情包| 久久亚洲2019中文字幕| 亚洲精品无码永久中文字幕| 日韩AV无码不卡网站| 本道天堂成在人线av无码免费| 亚洲精品无码久久久久| 中文字幕乱码免费看电影| 亚洲va中文字幕无码久久不卡| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看野外| 久久亚洲AV成人出白浆无码国产 | 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 成人无码小视频在线观看| 无码人妻AV一二区二区三区| 伊人久久综合无码成人网| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区应用| 国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲人成中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲高清有码中文字| 中文字幕极速在线观看| 中日精品无码一本二本三本| 亚洲成a人无码av波多野按摩| 国产在线观看无码免费视频| 免费无码又爽又黄又刺激网站| 精品国产毛片一区二区无码| 久久影院午夜理论片无码| 无码任你躁久久久久久 | 蜜臀AV无码国产精品色午夜麻豆| 丰满人妻AV无码一区二区三区 |