USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Time to close gap between public view and reality of climate change

    By Op Rana | China Daily | Updated: 2015-02-02 07:49

    People ignorant or in denial of climate change and climate science are not new. Even the division between scientists on climate change is not new, although most (about 97 percent) active climate scientists believe humans are a major cause of climate change, while the number is "radically different" among economic geologists, or scientists who (according to Naomi Klein) study natural formations so that they can be commercially exploited.

    Despite the contradictions and complications, we expect people in the world's most advanced country to accord some importance to, if not respect, the findings of scientists. But a Pew Research Center poll released on Jan 29 says American public and scientists hold vastly different views on climate change, genetically modified (GM) foods and (not surprisingly) evolution.

    About 87 percent of the scientists who responded to the Pew poll said human activity was the main cause of climate change, but only 50 percent of the general public agreed with them. Disturbingly, about 25 of the Americans polled said there was no "solid evidence" to prove that the climate was warming - the percentage of such skeptics in a 2009 survey was only 11 percent.

    The divide over GM foods was wider, with 88 percent of the scientists surveyed saying they were safe to eat compared with 37 percent of the public. The gap between scientists and the general public on evolution was wide too, with 98 percent of the scientists saying humans had evolved over time, compared with 65 percent of the public.

    The difference in the beliefs (based on evidence, empirical or otherwise) of scientists and the public should not be surprising, because about 53 percent of the "economic scientists" do not believe in human-caused climate change.

    The fact is, as Klein says in her latest book, This Changes Everything: "... we are all inclined to denial when the truth is too costly - whether emotionally, intellectually, or financially. As Upton Sinclair ... observed: 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.'"

    The Pew survey results are not surprising because there is a connection between the refusal to "accept the science of climate change and social and economic privilege". Most of the climate change deniers are not only conservative but also "white and male" - a group with higher than average income. Worse, members of this group are more prone to be highly confident of their views even if they are scientifically wrong.

    The Pew study reveals the difference between perception (of the American public) and reality (which scientists, based on empirical evidence, believe in). If we juxtapose the American public with the people in the rest of the world, we are most likely to get the same result, but that doesn't change the reality, that the planet and its attributes are not what they should have been in natural circumstances and that humans are responsible for that because they are the only beings who have the power to alter it.

    And as Alan Leshner, the chief executive of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a leading scientific organization that publishes the journal Science, said: "Speaking up for the importance of science to society is our only hope, and scientists must not shy away from engaging with the public, even on the most polarizing science-based topics." Factors, including political views on climate change and religious beliefs on evolution, are out to trump science because of lack of scientific understanding among people.

    This is a dangerous trend in times when science should be ruling the minds of the people. This trend needs to be countered with the help of education programs sponsored by governments, especially governments in countries like China, which know what the reality of climate change is and how it can be mitigated.

    Will China, and other countries most threatened by climate change, take up this challenge?

    The author is a senior editor with China Daily. oprana@hotmail.com

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    久久AV高潮AV无码AV| 最近中文字幕免费mv在线视频| 人妻少妇无码视频在线| 国产成人午夜无码电影在线观看| 中文字幕日本人妻久久久免费| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码人妻| 亚洲AV成人无码久久精品老人| 最近的中文字幕在线看视频| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码二区| 丰满白嫩人妻中出无码| 综合国产在线观看无码| 最近中文字幕视频在线资源| 精品欧洲av无码一区二区14| 日韩免费无码视频一区二区三区| 无码国产精品一区二区免费3p| 一本色道无码道DVD在线观看| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 日本中文字幕在线| 久久AV无码精品人妻糸列 | 成人A片产无码免费视频在线观看| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV| 中文无码vs无码人妻| 成人无码视频97免费| 国产中文在线观看| 久久久久亚洲av无码专区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码绿巨人| 亚欧免费无码aⅴ在线观看| 一本一道av中文字幕无码| 午夜不卡久久精品无码免费| 中出人妻中文字幕无码| 亚洲AV成人无码久久精品老人| 亚洲精品无码专区久久久 | 日韩人妻无码中文字幕视频| 最近中文字幕大全免费版在线 | 精选观看中文字幕高清无码| 最近2019免费中文字幕6| 国产成人无码免费看片软件| 亚洲人成影院在线无码按摩店| 精品无码人妻一区二区免费蜜桃|