USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / Across America

    College students in China: Are they critical thinkers or not?

    By Matthew Turncr | China Daily USA | Updated: 2016-08-03 11:07

    Can college students in China do critical thinking?

    That question was answered by a headline in The New York Times on July 30 atop a Stanford University study of Chinese education: "Study Finds Chinese Students Excel in Critical Thinking. Until College."

    The study of Chinese education shows that Chinese high school students perform above international averages, but this trend either stagnates or drops during college. By looking at scores and other data, the study concludes that happens because of a lack of "critical thinking".

    In its assessment of problems in Chinese education, the study is largely correct. But it also assumes that critical thinking can be taught by reorienting education around skills- and jobs-based models. The two have little to do with each other.

    I know this because I taught high school and college in Beijing for six years. And like anyone who has been on the inside of the Chinese educational system as a teacher or a student, I will readily admit that there are many problems - but a lack of critical thinking is not one of them.

    Classes can be overcrowded and attention appears to be paid mostly to quantitative data. With a declining job market, many students also feel that their schools are not preparing them for life after graduation. But this has little to do with critical thinking.

    Whether or not "the Chinese educational system kills creativity and kills innovation", as Eric X. Li, an entrepreneur and a sponsor of the study, says in the article, is simply beside the point. The study is confusing critical thinking with what one needs to get a job - which is largely a robust economy.

    If one wants to see critical thinking on Chinese college campuses, it can be found easily, just not necessarily where one expects.

    During the time I taught, I had a range of students from different economic strata and with different life goals. At one school, students who wanted to major in the natural sciences were assigned to the department of foreign languages, where I taught American literature.

    In my classes there I would often have unenthusiastic students, but I also had many students that surprised me. They comprehended on a high level what we were studying, and I found many students both curious and eager to work hard. If possible, some wanted to contribute something to the field.

    In other words: critical thinking and innovation.

    Later I realized that I'm not an especially gifted teacher or scholar - certainly no more than the thousands of other educators in China. I also taught students zero about job skills. I taught literature, after all.

    So why did my students demonstrate exactly the qualities that the Stanford study says are lacking when it claims to "measure critical thinking"?

    I asked James Williams, a professor of history at Renmin University of China, one of the top universities in China, what he thought the reason was: "I think the major issue is that students are not asked to engage in critical thinking at the university level. If you ask them to be critical of a text or idea they are more than happy to oblige," he said.

    This speaks to my point. By claiming to measure critical thinking and then offer technical or job-based solutions, the Stanford study misses the mark. In a forest of solutions and data, all that was needed was to ask students what they thought the problems with Chinese education were.

    The students interviewed for the article needed critical thinking skills even to answer the questions posed, so where is the lack?

    The solution to some problems in the Chinese education system may indeed lie partially in better job skills and smaller classes, but that has little to do with critical thinking.

    If one wants to see critical thinking, one simply needs to listen to what students have to say.

    Contact the writer at matthewturner@chinadailyusa.com.

    Polar icebreaker Snow Dragon arrives in Antarctic
    Xi's vision on shared future for humanity
    Air Force units explore new airspace
    Premier Li urges information integration to serve the public
    Dialogue links global political parties
    Editor's picks
    Beijing limits signs attached to top of buildings across city
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    国产中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区在线播放| 亚洲日本中文字幕天堂网| 国产福利电影一区二区三区久久老子无码午夜伦不 | 国产乱码精品一区二区三区中文| 人妻系列无码专区无码中出| 最好看的电影2019中文字幕 | 麻豆aⅴ精品无码一区二区| 久久精品中文字幕第23页| 综合无码一区二区三区| 精品无码一区二区三区亚洲桃色| 一本色道无码不卡在线观看| 中文字幕在线一区二区在线| 一二三四社区在线中文视频| 日韩无码系列综合区| 国产高清无码视频| 18禁网站免费无遮挡无码中文| 亚洲2022国产成人精品无码区| 最近的2019免费中文字幕| 亚洲色偷拍另类无码专区| 最近2019好看的中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品无码中文字| 久久亚洲av无码精品浪潮| 国产AV无码专区亚洲Av| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费看| 伊人久久精品无码二区麻豆| 国产成人无码AV一区二区| 三上悠亚ssⅰn939无码播放| 日韩三级中文字幕| 成人无码区免费A片视频WWW| 一级中文字幕免费乱码专区| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 成人无码网WWW在线观看| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久秋霞2| 亚洲色无码专区在线观看| 亚洲av无码国产精品色午夜字幕| 亚洲成AV人片在线播放无码 | 免费A级毛片无码视频| 国产乱人无码伦av在线a| 2024你懂的网站无码内射| 国产精品va在线观看无码|