USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Has two-child policy had the desired effect?

    By Stuart Gietel-basten | China Daily | Updated: 2016-12-08 07:47

    As the two-child policy approaches its first birthday, commentators and the Chinese government are looking for evidence to see whether it has had the desired effect: an increase in the birth rate in order to mitigate some of the effects of an aging population.

    At first glance, the evidence seems to be promising. It is estimated that there will be around 17.5 million births in 2016. At over one million more than in 2015 one might say the two-child policy has been a success. Without doubt, many couples have seized the opportunity to have a second child, realizing both a personal dream and a favorable outcome for the country. However, there are a few words of caution.

    Firstly, as the Year of the Sheep, 2015 was widely perceived to be a not-so-good year to have children. Numerous studies have said the influence of the zodiac is still strong among the Chinese. It is likely, then, that many would-be parents may have simply postponed having children in 2015, choosing instead to have babies in the more favorable Year of the Monkey. Indeed, if we look at the longer-term trends, the number of births in 2015 actually fell from 2014.

    Secondly, we still do not know the total impact of what demographers call the "tempo effect". As countries develop and, especially, as educational and employment opportunities for women grow, childbearing tends to be postponed. As this has happened in most low fertility countries, we can expect this to have happened in China, too. The problem, however, is that this effect tends to distort the total fertility rate, usually exaggerating both baby busts and baby booms. Also, simply counting the number of births tells us very little about the birth rate, as this is going to be affected by the number who are "at risk" of having children. In China, of course, this is going to be related not just to being of reproductive age, but also to marital status.

    Taking these elements together, therefore, we have to conclude that it is just too soon to say whether or not these changes in family planning are having the desired effect. We will know more in a few more years when we have better period data with which we can identify a trend. In reality, though, it is only when the cohorts born in the 1980s and 1990s have completed their childbearing will we see the true demographic impact of the policy change.

    Two final notes of caution. The evidence seems to suggest that changing the family planning policy alone will not be enough to make a significant difference to the fertility rate. As elsewhere in East Asia, concerns about jobs, social welfare, cost of living, housing, kindergarten access, gender equity and so on have as much impact upon the decision to limit childbearing as family planning policy. Alleviating these concerns is critical to increasing China's low fertility rate.

    Secondly, it is critical to remember that raising the birth rate alone is not the only answer to managing China's aging population. Indeed, in the short term, it would increase the burden on the working age population by necessitating an increased number school places and the withdrawal of parents from the labor market to care for these children. Rather, China needs to take a holistic approach to this demographic challenge, and will have to deal with both the denominator and the numerator. On the one hand, improving labor productivity, moving up the value chain of innovation, increasing labor force participation, further reforming the State-owned enterprises and developing the global labor supply chain through the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road will be critical to maximizing output. On the other hand, reforming and developing better social welfare systems for the elderly as well as making progress in active aging policies will not only decrease the dependence of the older population, but could also free up the monies accrued as a result of high personal savings rates and, hence, spur domestic consumption.

    The author is associate professor of social policy at the University of Oxford.

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕| 亚洲av永久无码制服河南实里| 国产成人无码区免费网站| 成 人无码在线视频高清不卡 | 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看| 精品人妻V?出轨中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品无码专区| 亚洲VA中文字幕不卡无码| 在线播放中文字幕| 久久无码AV中文出轨人妻| 亚洲精品成人无码中文毛片不卡| 波多野结衣中文字幕免费视频 | 2024你懂的网站无码内射| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AWWW| 日本阿v网站在线观看中文| 成在人线av无码免费高潮水 | 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕| 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜不卡| 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 亚洲av中文无码| 久久国产精品无码网站| 无码h黄动漫在线播放网站| 国产色无码精品视频免费| 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇 | 欧美中文字幕一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码播放免费| 久久久无码精品午夜| 国产无码区| 精品人无码一区二区三区| 亚洲VA成无码人在线观看天堂 | 亚洲熟妇无码八AV在线播放| 亚洲精品一级无码中文字幕| 中文在线√天堂| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕图| 7777久久亚洲中文字幕| 中文字幕免费视频| 天堂最新版中文网| 最近2019免费中文字幕6| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线看 | 亚洲av无码国产精品夜色午夜| 中文字幕日韩精品无码内射|