USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Democracy or humility? Why not both?

    By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-01-28 08:25

    Recent shock polling results have opened the world's eyes to the fact that no form of government is totally flawless

    Democracy, as Britain's wartime prime minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

    Even if he did not say precisely that, it is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

    China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development. But now, it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

    A widespread sentiment within Western electorates, that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites, is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the US and Britain and may play a role in future outcomes of 2017.

    On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in Britain and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system - the people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

    Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

    A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

    Among some who voted for Brexit on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

    For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

    Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

    Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

    A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

    A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

    Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

    Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

    It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

    Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and a recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures have taken a different road.

    Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

    The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. To contact the writer at harvey.morris@gmail.com

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码人妻精品一区二| 亚洲Av永久无码精品三区在线| 亚洲色无码一区二区三区| 免费无码婬片aaa直播表情| 自拍偷在线精品自拍偷无码专区| 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 中文字幕本一道先锋影音| 久久青青草原亚洲av无码| 人妻少妇偷人精品无码| 一本本月无码-| 日本一区二区三区中文字幕| 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇 | 国产免费无码一区二区| 成人A片产无码免费视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合在线中文| heyzo高无码国产精品| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区99| 精品高潮呻吟99av无码视频| 中文字幕精品久久久久人妻| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 亚洲国产91精品无码专区| 精品无码一级毛片免费视频观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久久| 中文字幕在线观看一区二区| 欧美日韩不卡一区二区三区中文字| 日韩久久久久久中文人妻| 国产 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 少妇人妻综合久久中文字幕 | 日韩精选无码| 少妇中文无码高清| 久久久精品无码专区不卡| 无码AV一区二区三区无码| 久久久久久av无码免费看大片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品无码区| av大片在线无码免费| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站国产| 国产成人无码A区在线观看视频| 99久久人妻无码精品系列| 成人无码免费一区二区三区 | 亚洲中文字幕日本无线码|